ObjectiveTo explore the characteristics of blood pressure variability (BPV) in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients with and without diabetes mellitus and the effects of BPV on cardiac function based on the research of clinical data. MethodsOne hundred MHD patients treated in the Hemodialysis Center of the People’s Hospital of Taixing City between January 2013 and January 2015 were recruited and divided into diabetes group (n=46) and non-diabetes group (n=54). Interdialytic and intradialytic BPV and cardiac function were monitored and compared between the two groups. Standard deviation (SD) and coefficient of variation (CV) were used for the evaluation of BPV. ResultsTriacylglycerol, cholesterol and plasma albumin were significantly different between the diabetes group and non-diabetes group (P<0.05), while hemoglobin, serum calcium, phosphorus and parathyroid hormone were not significantly different between the two groups (P>0.05). Forty-two patients in the diabetes group and 53 in the non-diabetes group took antihypertensive drugs. The varieties of antihypertensive drugs and the proportion of patients who used antihypertensive drugs were not significantly different between the two groups. The ambulatory blood pressure monitoring displayed 40 patients (86.9%) with reverse dipper or non-dipper blood pressure in the diabetes group and 35 (64.8%) in the non-diabetes group, and the difference was significant (P<0.05). The interdialytic mean systolic blood pressure (SBP), SBP-SD and SBP-CV in the diabetes group were all significantly higher than those in the non-diabetes group (P<0.05), and the mean diastolic blood pressure (DBP), DBP-SD and DBP-CV were also significantly different between the two groups (P<0.05). The intradialytic mean SBP, SBP-SD and SBP-CV in the diabetes group were significantly higher than those in the non-diabetes group (P<0.05), but there were no significant differences in intradialytic mean DBP, DBP-SD and DBP-CV between the two groups. In patients with reverse dipper or non-dipper blood pressure, the interventricular septal thickness, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter and ejection fraction were significantly different between the diabetes group and the non-diabetes group. However, in patients with dipper blood pressure, the cardiac function parameters were not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusion MHD patients with diabetes have higher ratio of reverse dipper or non-dipper blood pressure, more significant blood pressure variability and more severe cardiac function damage.
Objective To explore the best mode of blood pressure monitoring by comparing the correlation of deferent kinds of blood pressure variability with arterial stiffness. Methods This study was conducted among 140 hypertensive patients in Wuhou Strict, Chengdu. Baseline data was collected including demographic data, biochemical examination and brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) measurement and so on. A consecutive home blood pressure was also gained by the individuals themselves and the clinical blood pressure was also recorded during the visit. The correlation between baPWV and the blood pressure variability were tested. Results The blood pressure variability measured at home in the morning was independently correlated with baPWV (r=0.313, P=0.011), the blood pressure variability measured at home in the evening was also independently correlated with baPWV (r=0.241, P=0.042), and day-to-day morning blood pressure variability measured at home was correlated with baPWV (r= 0.269, P=0.030). The correlation of month-to-month blood pressure variability and blood pressure variability gained at clinic room with baPWV was not significant (P>0.05). Conclusion In the monitoring of blood pressure variability in hypertensive patients, the blood pressure variability monitoring at home is better than that at the clinic room; and monitoring in the morning is better than that in the evening.
Blood pressure variability (BPV) refers to the fluctuations of blood pressure in a certain period of time. In recent years, BPV is becoming a predictive marker for cardiovascular events. Given the hemodynamic and internal environmental change brought by hemodialysis as well as the complex complications, hemodialysis patients always have complex BPV. Nowadays there is no consensus on an optimal standard to evaluate BPV in hemodialysis population. Metrics usually used are as follows: blood pressure change during a certain period of time, standard deviation, coefficient of variation, variation independent of mean, average real variability, weighted mean of daytime and night-time standard deviation, residual derived from generalized linear models, and residual standard deviation. Impact factors of BPV in hemodialysis patients include age, ultrafitration volume, hemodialysis frequency and time length, peripheral vascular disease, serum calcium, antihypertensive drugs and so on. Recent studies showed significant associations between both long-term and short-term BPV with prognosis of hemodialysis patients. This review focuses on the evaluation methods, the influencing factors and the impact on prognosis of BPV.
Blood pressure variability (BPV) is a novel predictor related to blood pressure level, and a large number of studies based on the hypertension cohort have shown that BPV is an independent predictor of target organ damages and cardiovascular adverse outcomes. Due to the significant hemodynamic changes, BPV in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and hemodialysis is higher than the simple hypertension cohort, suggesting that BPV may be of great significance to patients with chronic kidney disease and hemodialysis. In recent years, studies based on CKD and hemodialysis cohort have published in succession whose results revealed that BPV of this cohort is of great prognostic significance for predicting target organ damages and cardiovascular disease risks. This article aims to provide an overview on these research, so as to survey and predict the clinical significance of BPV in CKD and hemodialytic patients.