Based on the existing clinical research of pediatric Tuina, this paper introduced the current types of pediatric Tuina and their applications in the aspect of growth of newborn babies, emotion problems, pain, respiratory system diseases, digestive system diseases, jaundice, brain and nerve system diseases. As for the clinical researches of pediatric Tuina, the authors found the challenges including different understandings of pediatric Tuina, poor quality of clinical researches, and lack of basic data regarding pediatric Tuina. Meanwhile, the authors suggested three corresponding strategies to improve the clinical researches, i.e. to extract valuable intervention methods based on clinical practice; to conduct high quality clinical studies; to gradually collect and accumulate basic data according to a certain plan.
Objective To analyze and evaluate the present status of application of clinical pathway evaluation indexes in China, in order to provide references to establish an evaluation system on clinical pathway. Methods Such databases as CBM (2004-2009), VIP (2004-2009), CNKI (2004-2009) and WanFang Data (2004-2009), and some relevant websites were searched systematically for collecting Chinese literature about domestic clinical pathway evaluation indexes. Results Among the 1 175 articles included, 135 (11%) were published in the core periodicals, 19 (2%) were masterate theses, and 1 021 were other kinds of articles. As to 135 core periodical literature and 19 masterate theses, most of which were graded into the second level of evidence, accounting for 96%. The analysis on the appearance of indexes showed that 87% of inconsistency could be identified between the contents and terms of indexes. Common indexes were summarized as the following four aspects: cost index, clinical index, serving index and quality evaluation index. There were 78% of all the 1 175 articles focusing on the application of nursing and medical education, in which only one masterate thesis used social research methods such as Delphi, focus group, experts scoring (percentile), etc. Conclusion Currently, there are some issues existing in the evaluation indexes of clinical pathway in China, such as low methodological quality of literature, irregularly and randomly using statistical terms, and lack of studies on system construction of clinical pathway evaluation indexes.
ObjectiveTo compare the clinical effectiveness of Chinese medicine and integrated Chinese medicine and antimicrobial drugs in the treatment of pneumonia. MethodsThe electronic medical record (EMR) of patients with pneumonia who admitted to the Classical Department of Chinese Medicine of Guangdong Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from November 29, 2012 to June 17, 2022 were retrospectively collected. The patients were divided into two groups according to whether they were treated with antimicrobial drugs on the basis of Chinese medicine treatment. The non-exposed group was the traditional Chinese medicine group, and the exposed group was the integrated Chinese medicine and antimicrobial drugs group. Propensity score matching method was used to balance possible confounding factors. COX regression analysis was performed on the matched cohort to compare death rates among the groups, and Kaplan-Meier curve was drawn to evaluate the survival probability during hospitalization. The proportion of maximum oxygen concentration and duration of fever remission were compared between the two groups. ResultsThis study included a total of 898 cases, with the majority (over 95%) falling within the range of mild to moderate severity. After propensity score matching,180 patients were remained in each group, among which the baseline characteristics were comparable. The primary outcome indicators showed that the risk of death during hospitalization was same in the integrated Chinese medicine and antimicrobial drugs group and in the Chinese medicine group (HR=1.52, 95%CI 0.36 to 6.39, P=0.566), the subgroup analysis is consistent with the overall trend of the results, and the differences were not statistically significant. The results indicate that during the hospitalization, the overall and subgroup mortality rates were similar between the two groups. The treatment effectiveness on the disappearance of major symptoms such as fever, cough, sputum production, fatigue, shortness of breath, and chest pain were comparable in both groups. The secondary outcome indicators showed that there was no statistical significance in the comparison of the proportion of maximum oxygen therapy concentration and the stable duration of fever remission between the two groups. ConclusionIn the treatment of patients with mainly mild to moderate pneumonia, the effectiveness of the Chinese medicine group and the integrated Chinese medicine and antimicrobial drugs group in the hospitalization mortality, the disappearance of major symptoms, the proportion of maximum oxygen therapy concentration and the stable duration of fever remission are similar. Chinese medicine has a positive significance in reducing the use of antimicrobials in patients with pneumonia.
Objective To enhance medical quality evaluation by conducting a systematic review and evidence-based synthesis of relevant research. Methods Such databases as CBM (1978 to 2009), VIP (1989 to 2009), CNKI (1990 to 2009), WanFang Dissertation database (1997 to 2009), and relevant websites were searched to identify relevant Chinese studies for the synthetical evaluation on methods evaluating medical quality. Results A total of 216 articles including 184 observational studies, 29 traditional reviews, and 3 experts’ opinions were identified. Twenty-one synthetical evaluation methods were used among 216 articles, and the top three methods which had been quoted more than 30 times were: RSR (19.72%), TOPSIS method (19.03%), and comprehensive index (12.80%). Among the 184 observational research papers, the documents using one kind of comprehensive evaluation took up 89.13% (164/184), the ones using two kinds of evaluation methods accounted for 9.78% (18/184), and those using three kinds of methods accounted for 1.09% (2/184). Conclusion a) The joint use of two or more than two methods is not common. The majority of studies using single comprehensive evaluation method focus on RSR, TOPSIS and comprehensive index method; b) The comprehensive evaluation method is considered non-uniform, some not even standardized; c) Most of the medical literatures do not correct the value of quality assessment; and d) Considerably most studies perform retrospective evaluation with historical data.