ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of pediatric tuina in the treatment of children with acute diarrhea.MethodsCNKI, VIP, WanFang Data, CBM, PubMed and The Cochrane Library databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the treatment of children acute diarrhea with tuina from inception to November 20th, 2020. Two researchers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 15 RCTs involving 1 464 children were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that compared with Western medicine, tuina for children with acute diarrhea could increase the cure rate (RR=1.43, 95%CI 1.26 to 1.63, P<0.001), shorten the time for the frequency of diarrhea to return to normal (MD=−0.86, 95%CI −1.05 to −0.66, P<0.001) and the time for stool traits to return to normal (MD=−1.07, 95%CI −1.15 to −0.99, P<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between tuina and Western medicine (RR=0.25, 95%CI 0.03 to 2.23, P=0.22).ConclusionsCurrent evidence shows that tuina has a superior effect on treating children with acute diarrhea, the incidence of adverse reactions is not increased. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high-quality studies are needed to verify above conclusions.
As an essential tool for clinical practice, the clinical practice guidelines have been continuously completed and the quality of the guidelines has been improved. However, there are still issues in updating the guidelines and recommendations. This article introduces the living guideline formulation method, through dynamic monitoring, timely inclusion of new evidence, and living update of recommendations, etc. to improve the timeliness of clinical guidelines. The article aims to provide methodological references for the timely transformation of evidence and the update of guidelines.
ObjectiveTo develop a survey questionnaire on preferences and values regarding perineal injury prevention measures during pregnancy and conduct reliability and validity testing. MethodsCombining literature review, qualitative interviews, and expert consultations, we summarized key elements of perineal injury prevention during pregnancy and synthesized the best evidence. Through multiple discussions within the core working group, a survey questionnaire on preferences and values regarding perineal injury prevention measures during pregnancy was formulated. Using convenience sampling, pregnant women were recruited, and a pre-survey was conducted using the questionnaire. Pre-survey results were analyzed using item analysis and reliability and validity testing methods to validate and refine the questionnaire. ResultsThe questionnaire was compiled based on the theory of evidence-based decision-making. The initial version of the questionnaire was developed by combining systematic evaluation, network meta-analysis, and semi-structured interviews. The questionnaire was modified and improved through expert consultation, group discussion, and pre-investigation, which ensured that the questionnaire had good reliability, validity, and practicability. The Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.87, a split-half reliability was 0.71, and a content validity index was 0.97 of the survey questionnaire. ConclusionThe present version of the perineal injury preventive measures preference and values questionnaire has good reliability, validity, and practicability. It can serve as a valuable tool for investigating preferences and values related to perineal injury prevention during pregnancy.
Acute diarrhea has a high incidence in children. Pediatric tuina has been widely used in children with acute diarrhea in China. However, there is no guideline on the treatment of tuina for children with acute diarrhea. This guideline was developed following evidence-based principles and the World Health Organization handbook for guideline development. The linked systematic review was conducted following the Cochrane handbook. The quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations were evaluated using the GRADE approach. The reporting followed the RIGHT statement. Seven clinical questions (2 foreground questions and 5 background questions) were identified by literature review and expert consensus. Based on the linked systematic review and through comprehensive consideration of the balance of benefit and harm, quality of evidence, patient preferences, and other resources, we formulated the recommendations using Delphi expert consensus. We suggested combination of a weak recommendation for tuina with Western medicine usual care to treat children with acute diarrhea. This guideline can be used by clinicians and nurses in the department of traditional Chinese medicine pediatrics, and department of pediatric tuina, and can also be used as a reference for relevant clinicians of Western medicine and is also applicable to all institutions that practice tuina treatment.