ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of flexible fixation and rigid fixation in the treatment of ankle pronation-external rotation fractures with distal tibiofibular syndesmosis.MethodsA retrospective analysis was made on the clinical data of 50 patients with ankle pronation-external rotation fractures and distal tibiofibular syndesmosis treated between January 2013 and December 2015. Suture-button fixation was used in 23 patients (flexible fixation group) and cortical screw fixation in 27 patients (rigid fixation group). There was no significant difference in age, gender, weight, side, fracture type, and time from trauma to surgery between 2 groups (P>0.05). The operation time, medial clear space (MCS), tibiofibular clear space (TFCS), tibiofibular overlap (TFO), American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, and Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI) score were compared between 2 groups.ResultsThe operation time was (83.0±9.1) minutes in the flexible fixation group and was (79.6±13.1) minutes in the rigid fixation group, showing no significant difference (t=1.052, P=0.265). All patients achieved healing of incision by first intention. The patients were followed up 12-20 months (mean, 14 months). The X-ray films showed good healing of fracture in 2 groups. There was no screw fracture, delayed union or nounion. The fracture healing time was (12.1±2.5) months in the flexible fixation group and was (11.3±3.2) months in the rigid fixation group, showing no significant difference between 2 groups (t=1.024, P=0.192). Reduction loss occurred after removal of screw in 2 cases of the rigid fixation group. At last follow-up, there was no significant difference in MCS, TFCS, TFO, AOFAS score and FADI score between 2 groups (P>0.05).ConclusionSuture-button fixation has similar effectiveness to screw fixation in ankle function and imaging findings, and flexible fixation has lower risk of reduction loss of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis than rigid fixation.
ObjectiveTo study the feasibility and safety of CT-guided preoperative Hookwire localization of pulmonary nodules in clinical application.MethodsClinical data of 102 patients who were scheduled to undergo surgical treatment for pulmonary nodules from June 2015 to April 2020 in the North Ward of Thoracic Surgery Department of Ruijin Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. There were 38 males and 64 females, aged 23-82 (53.2±12.8) years.ResultsAll 102 patients with pulmonary nodules underwent CT-guided preoperative Hookwire localization successfully, with a localization success rate of 100.0%. The localization time was 27.0 (11-67) min; the number of times to adjust the angle during the positioning process was 6.9 (3-14); the needle depth of the positioning needle was 41.5 (16.3-69.1) mm. A total of 48 (47.1%) patients had a small amount of bleeding in the lung tissue in the positioning area after positioning; 53 (51.9%) patients had a small amount of pneumothorax after positioning; 16 (15.7%) patients were found that the positioning needle completely shedded from the lung tissue in the subsequent surgery. One patient was transferred to open thoracotomy because of extensive dense adhesion in the thorax, and the remaining 101 patients were operated on under thoracoscopy. Postoperative pathology showed that 5 (4.9%) patients were adenocarcinoma in situ, 28 (27.5%) were microinvasive adenocarcinoma, 36 (35.3%) patients were invasive carcinoma and 32 (31.3%) patients were benign lesions. No patients had complications or adverse events related to preoperative positioning.ConclusionPreoperative CT-guided localization of Hookwire intrapulmonary nodules is safe and effective, and can meet the intraoperative localization needs of thoracic surgeons in most clinical situations, and is not inferior to other preoperative localization methods currently used in clinics.