Hypophosphatemia is a common and potentially serious complication during continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), which is often underestimated and ignored. This article systematically searched and reviewed the relevant literature on previous CRRT and hypophosphatemia, and summarized the risk factors affecting hypophosphatemia during CRRT, the impact on the body, and the existing phosphorus supplement scheme during CRRT, so as to attract everyone’s attention to hypophosphatemia during CRRT in clinical work.
Objective To explore the safety and efficacy of regional citrate anticoagulation in hemoperfusion combined with continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). Methods Patients who underwent continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration tandem hemoperfusion between January 2021 and March 2022 in West China Hospital of Sichuan University were retrospectively enrolled. All patients received double-lumen catheter indwelling through internal jugular vein or femoral vein for vascular access, and were treated with Prismaflex V8.0 CRRT machine, extracorporeal circulation line ST150, and disposable hemoperperfusion device HA380. Four percent sodium citrate was pumped from the arterial end at the rate of 180-200 mL/h. The blood pump rate was 130-150 mL/min, the ratio of dialysis fluid to the dose of replacement fluid was 1∶1, the amount of CRRT treatment agent was 20-35 mL/(kg·h), replacement fluid was added by post-dilution method, and the treatment time of hemoperfusion was 8-10 h. The dialysis treatment completion rate, the cardiopulmonary bypass life, the incidence of coagulation events, and the levels of procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, etc. were observed. Results A total of 143 cases of treatment were completed in 75 patients, among them, 119 cases were successfully completed and the completion rate of hemoperfusion treatment was 83.2%. The average life of hemoperfusion devices was (8.5±1.5) h. Bleeding or blood clotting occurred in 18.9% of the treatment (27/143), 13 cases had CRRT extracorporeal circulation coagulation, 11 cases had hemoperfusion device coagulation, and 3 cases had gastrointestinal bleeding. The ionic calcium levels after the filter of 93 cases of treatment were maintained around 0.25-0.35 mmol/L, and the peripheral calcium levels were maintained around 1.0-1.1 mmol/L. Compared with that at 0 h, the procalcitonin decreased significantly 72 h after hemoperfusion treatment (P=0.014), while there was no significant change in interleukin-6 or C-reactive protein after 72 h treatment (P>0.05). None of the patients experienced anaphylaxis during treatment. Conclusion In CRRT combined with hemoperfusion, the use of regional citrate anticoagulation results in good cardiopulmonary bypass life, inflammatory mediators clearance, and a lower risk of bleeding.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of in vitro anticoagulation with nafamostat mesilate in continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) in patients with sepsis complicated with acute kidney injury (AKI). Methods The study subjects were sepsis patients with AKI who underwent CRRT in West China Hospital of Sichuan University and were at high risk of bleeding. CRRT patients who received in vitro anticoagulation with nafamostat mesilate between July 2021 and January 2022 were included in the nafamostat group. The medical records of CRRT patients who did not use anticoagulants between January 2020 and December 2020 were retrospectively collected as a control group. The general situation, the lifespan of the first CRRT filter, the number of filters used within 72 hours of treatment, laboratory tests before and after treatment, and the occurrence of adverse reactions during treatment of the two groups of patients were analyzed. Results There were 42 patients in the control group and 21 patients in the nafamostat group. There was no statistically significant difference in age, gender, body mass index, mean arterial pressure, primary disease, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation Ⅱ score, or pre-treatment laboratory test results between the two groups of patients (P>0.05). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the lifespan of the first filter was longer in the nafamostat group than in the control group (hazard ratio=0.408, P<0.05). The number of filters used by the control group patients after 72 hours of treatment was greater than that of the nafamostat group patients (2.1±0.6 vs. 1.3±0.5, P<0.05). After 72 hours of treatment, serum creatinine levels [(99.4±15.7) vs. (127.6±20.5)] μmol/L], urea nitrogen [(4.5±1.9) vs. (6.8±2.3) mmol/L], cystatin C [(1.0±0.2) vs. (1.2±0.2) mg/L], uric acid [(86.5±15.3) vs. (105.3±20.3) μmol/L] in the nafamostat group were lower than those of the control group (P<0.05), and there was no statistically significant difference in the results of other laboratory tests (P>0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in adverse reactions between the two groups of patients (P>0.05). Conclusion For patients with sepsis complicated with AKI who undergo CRRT and are at high risk of bleeding, nafamostat mesilate may be a safe and effective anticoagulant for in vitro anticoagulation.