Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of combined posterior decompression with laminoplasty and anterior decompression with fusion for the treatment of cervical spinal canal stenosis with reverse arch. Methods Between May 2009 and February 2012, 13 cases of cervical spinal canal stenosis with reverse arch underwent posterior decompression with laminoplasty surgery in prone position and then anterior decompression with fusion surgery in supine position. There were 7 males and 6 females with an average age of 43.5 years (range, 38-62 years) and an average disease duration of 25 months (range, 18-60 months). All the patients had neck axial symptoms and spinal cord compressed symptoms, and lateral computer radiology (CR) of the neck showed reverse arch of cervical vertebrae. Segments of intervertebral disc protrusion included C3-6 in 4 cases, C4-7 in 4 cases, and C3-7 in 5 cases. After operation, anteroposterior and lateral CR was used to observe the cervical curvature change and fixation loosening, MRI to observe the change of the compression on spinal cord, visual analogue scale (VAS) score to evaluate the improvement of axial symptom, and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score to assess the nerve function improvement. Results All incisions healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 9-32 months (mean, 15.4 months). Internal fixator had good position without loosening or breaking and the compression on spinal cord improved significantly after operation. All the patients obtained bony fusion at 6 months after operation. The axial symptoms and the nerve function at last follow-up were improved. VAS score at last follow-up (3.25 ± 1.54) was significantly lower than that at preoperation (6.55 ± 1.52) (P lt; 0.05); JOA score at last follow-up (10.45 ± 4.23) was significantly higher than that at preoperation (7.05 ± 1.32) (P lt; 0.05); and cervical curvature value at last follow-up [(6.53 ± 3.12) mm] was significantly higher than that at preoperation [(3.22 ± 5.15) mm] (P lt; 0.05). Conclusion Combined posterior decompression with laminoplasty and anterior decompression with fusion for the treatment of cervical spinal canal stenosis with reverse arch is a safe and effective surgical method.
Objective To analyse the correlation between cervical sagittal parameters of cervical spondylotic myelopathy in different sagittal curvature so as to find out representative cervical sagittal alignment parameters by measuring on MRI. Methods A retrospective analysis was made on the clinical data of 88 patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy between July 2015 and January 2016. The C2-C7 Cobb angle, T1 slope (T1S), and C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (C2-C7 SVA) were measured on T2-weight MRI. According to C2-C7 Cobb angle, the patients were divided into lordosis group (≥10° Cobb angle, 48 cases) and straightened group (0-10° Cobb angle, 40 cases). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used for the reliability of measured data, Pearson correlation analysis for correlation between cervical sagittal parameters. Results ICC was 0.858-0.946, indicating good consistency of measurement parameters. The C2-C7 Cobb angle, T1S, and C2-C7 SVA were (5.6±2.4)°, (22.2±6.7)°, and (10.2±5.4) mm in straightened group, and were (20.1±8.2)°, (23.4±8.9)°, and (8.2±4.6) mm in lordosis group respectively. There was no correlation between the 3 parameters in straighten group (r=0.100,P=0.510 for T1S and C2-C7 Cobb angle;r=–0.100,P=0.500 for T1S and C2-C7 SVA;r=0.080,P=0.610 for C2-C7 Cobb angle and C2-C7 SVA). There was positive correlation between T1S and C2-C7 Cobb angle (r=0.540,P=0.000), negative correlation between T1S and C2-C7 SVA (r=–0.450,P=0.001), and no correlation between C2-C7 Cobb angle and C2-C7 SVA (r=–0.003,P=0.980). Conclusion For cervical spondylotic myelopathy in patients with cervical lordosis, only T1S measurement on MRI can be used as the main parameter to judge the sagittal curvature, but in patients with straightened cervical Cobb angle, measurements of T1S, C2-C7 Cobb angle, and C2-C7 SVA should be taken for the comprehensive evaluation of cervical sagittal curvature.
Objective To investigate whether preoperative T1 slope (T1S) in MRI can predict the changes of cervical curvature after expansive open-door laminoplasty (EOLP) in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy, so as to make up for the shortcomings of difficult measurement in X-ray film. Methods The clinical data of 36 patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy who underwent EOLP were retrospectively analysed. There were 21 males and 15 females with an average age of 55.8 years (range, 37-73 years) and an average follow-up time of 14.3 months (range, 12-24 months). The preoperative X-ray films at dynamic position, CT, and MRI of cervical spine before operation, and the anteroposterior and lateral X-ray films at last follow-up were taken out to measure the following sagittal parameters. The parameters included C2-C7 Cobb angle and C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (C2-C7 SVA) in all patients before operation and at last follow-up; preoperative T1S were measured in MRI, and the patients were divided into larger T1S group (T1S>19°, group A) and small T1S group (T1S≤19°, group B) according to the median of T1S, and the preoperative T1S, C2-C7 Cobb angle, C2-C7 SVA, and the C2-C7 Cobb angle and C2-C7 SVA at last follow-up, difference in axial distance (the difference of C2-C7 SVA before and after operation), postoperative curvature loss (the difference of C2-C7 Cobb angle before and after operation), the number of patients whose curvature loss was more than 5° after operation, and the number of patients whose kyphosis changed (C2-C7 Cobb angle was less than 0° after operation). Results The C2-C7 Cobb angle at last follow-up was significantly decreased when compared with preoperative value (t=8.000, P=0.000), but there was no significant difference in C2-C7 SVA between pre- and post-operation (t=–1.842, P=0.074). The preoperative T1S was (19.69±3.39)°; there were 17 cases in group A and 19 cases in group B with no significant difference in gender and age between 2 groups (P>0.05). The preoperative C2-C7 Cobb angle in group B was significantly lower than that in group A (t=–2.150, P=0.039), while there was no significant difference in preoperative C2-C7 SVA between 2 groups (t=0.206, P=0.838). At last follow-up, except for the curvature loss after operation in group B was significantly lower than that in group A (t=–2.723, P=0.010), there was no significant difference in the other indicators between 2 groups (P>0.05). Conclusion Preoperative larger T1S (T1S>19°) in MRI had a larger preoperative lordosis angle, but more postoperative physiological curvature was lost; preoperative T1S in MRI can not predict postoperative curvature loss, but preoperative larger T1S may be more prone to kyphosis.