Objective To observe the effect of titanium mesh cage with self-locked titanium plate on the cervicalinter-body fusion after anterior discectomy of multilevel cervical intervertebral disc protrusion. Methods The therapeuticeffect of 18 patients who received the treatment of titanium mesh cage with self-locked titanium plate from September 2004 to June 2007 were retrospectively analyzed, including 11 males and 7 females (aged 32-75 years, 54 years on average). The course of disease was 6 months to 15 years (5.8 years on average). Sixteen patients suffered sensory dysfunction in l imbs. Concerning the muscle strength of extremities, 3 cases were on the second level, 12 were on the third level, 1 was on the fourth level, and 2 were on the fifth level. Sixteen cases had pyramidal sign, 13 had retention of urine and feces, 8 had sexual dysfunction, and 7 combined with symptoms of nerve root type. Twelve cases were consecutive multilevel and 6 cases were discontinuous multilevel. The mean JOA scores were 8.30 ± 1.21 preoperatively. X-ray films and MRI showed degeneration and protrusion of intervertebral disc and compression of cervical cord preoperatively. The height of involved intervertebral space was (6.40 ± 0.87) mm on X-ray films preoperatively. Results All the incisions were healed by first intention. All the patients were followed up for 6-36 months (18 months on average). The recovery of extremities motor function was better than that of sensory function at the early stage after operation. Muscular tension decreased after operation and mobil ity of l imbs was improved. The operated segments were instantly stable and sol id fusion was observed at 3-6 months after operation. JOA scores at 6 months after operation was 12.60 ± 0.78 with an improvement rate of 51.8%, indicating significant difference wasevident when compared with the JOA scores before operation (P lt; 0.05). The height of involved intervertebral space increased significantly to (8.20 ± 0.46) mm postoperatively, indicating the difference was significant (P lt; 0.05). According to Odom’s evaluation scale, 17 patients were graded as excellent and 1 as good. No death and compl ications of spinal cord, nerve, trachea and esophagus were observed. The cage witnessed no translocation. Conclusion Titanium mesh cage with self-locked titanium plate is more stable and effective for the treatment of multilevel cervical intervertebral disc protrusion.
Objective To compare the curative effect of posterior lumbar interbody fusion with autologous il iac crest to that of interbody fusion cage for adult instabil ity of lower lumbar. Methods From February 2003 to October 2006,60 inpatients with lower lumbar instabil ity were treated. Patients were randomized into 2 groups: bone-graft group (n=28) was treated with posterior lumbar interbody fusion with two autologous il iac crests, while cage group (n=32) was treated with posterior lumbar interbody fusion with two quadrate cages. In the bone-graft group, 17 males and 11 females aged (52.78 ± 10.50) years with 3-16 months of disease course, there were 12 cases of degenerative instabil ity, 14 isthmus sl it ol isthe and 2 iatrogenic instabil ity, including 1 case of L3,4, 17 cases of L4,5 and 10 cases of L5, S1. Relative disc space height was (23.24 ± 6.62) mm, disc space activity was (10.50 ± 5.07)º, sagittal saw sl ippage distance was (4.50 ± 1.15) mm and the JOA score was 18.56 ± 2.68. In the cage group, 19 males and 13 females aged (51.75 ± 10.44) years with 3.5-14.0 months of disease course, there were 16 cases of degenerative instabil ity, 14 isthmus sl it ol isthe and 2 iatrogenic instabil ity, including 16 cases of L4,5 and 16 cases of L5, S1. Relative disc space height was (24.34 ± 7.22) mm, disc space activity was (11.12 ± 5.67)º, sagittal saw sl ippage distance was (4.38 ± 0.75) mm and the JOA score was 19.00 ± 4.12. There was no significant difference between the two groups in termsof age, gender, JOA score, disc space activity and relative disc space height preoperatively (P gt; 0.05). Results All patients received the follow-up at the 1st, 3rd, 6th and 12th month postoperatively. There was no significant difference in operation time and hemorrhage amount between the two groups (P gt; 0.05), but significant difference in the cost of operation (P lt; 0.01). Two cases in the bone-graft group suffered donor site pain and received no treatment. Three cases in the bone-graft group and 2 cases in the cage group had symptom of nerve injury 1-2 days after surgery, which were cured after expectant treatment. There were no pseudoarticulation formation, intervertebral space infection and cage aversion in both groups. Significant difference of relative disc space height was found in each group pre- and post- operatively (P lt; 0.01) and significant differences were evident between the two groups at any of the time points (P lt; 0.01). One month after operation, there was significant difference between the two groups (P lt; 0.05). There was also significant difference at the 3rd, 6th and 12th month after operation (P lt; 0.01). No sign offusion was found in each group at the 1st and 3rd month after operation. In bone-graft group, there were 7 vertebral fusion cases 6 months after operation and 23 vertebral fusion cases 12 months after operation. In cage group, there were 8 vertebral fusion cases 6 months after operation and 29 vertebral fusion cases 12 months after operation. There was no significant difference in the rate of fusion at 6 and 12 months follow-up between the two groups (P gt; 0.05). Significant difference of JOA scores was found in each group pre- and post- operatively (P lt; 0.05). And no significant difference in JOA scores at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months follow-up was evident between the two groups (P gt; 0.05). Conclusion There is no significant difference between the two groups in the fusion time, the fusion rate and the cl inical symptoms alleviation, indicating autologous il iac crest is appl icable to interbody fusion for the treatment of adult instabil ity of lower lumbar and good therapeutic effect can be achieved with no immunoreaction and lower cost.
ObjectiveTo discuss the safety and effectiveness of combined dynamic cervical implant (DCI) and Cage fusion in the treatment of two-level cervical disc protrusion. MethodsBetween September 2009 and June 2011, 16 cases of two-level cervical disc protrusion were treated with combined DCI and Cage fusion. Of 16 cases, 10 were male and 6 were female, with a mean age of 44.1 years (range, 37-64 years) and with a mean disease duration of 5.1 years (range, 2-8 years), including 8 cases of cervical myelopathy, 5 cases of nerve root cervical myelopathy, and 3 cases of mixed cervical myelopathy. Radiological results indicated degenerative intervertebral discs and compressed never root or spinal cord. Involved discs included C3,4 and C4,5 (1 case), C3,4 and C5,6(5 cases), C4,5 and C5,6 (3 cases), C4,5 and C6,7 (5 cases), and C5,6 and C6,7 (2 cases). The neck disability index (NDI), Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, and visual analogue scale (VAS) were used to evaluate the neurological function and pain relief. The stabilities and activities of involved segments, intervertebral fusion, and displacement of Cages were observed during follow-up. ResultsPrimary healing of incisions was obtained in all cases; no complication of hematoma, infection, cerebrospinal fluid leakage, or neural function damage occurred. All 16 patients were followed up 18 months on average (range, 6-36 months). The cervical X-ray results indicated that the activities of involved segments was (7.8±3.1)°, showing no significant difference (t=0.655, P=0.132) when compared with preoperative value [(7.3±2.6)°]. No implant loosening was observed; slight heterotopic ossification occurred in 1 patient at the posterior rim of intervertebral space. No cage loosening or sinking was seen, and good fusion was achieved. The mean time of fusion was 4.5 months (range, 3-8 months). NDI, JOA, and VAS scores at last follow-up (18.3±5.1, 15.7±1.5, and 3.4±1.8 respectively) were significantly improved (t=2.131, P=0.016; t=3.126, P=0.024; t=6.102, P=0.038) when compared with preoperative scores (49.6±11.3, 12.8±2.0, and 6.7±1.2 respectively). ConclusionA combination of DCI and intervertebral Cage fusion has satisfactory early effectiveness in treatment of two-level cervical intervertebral protrusion for maintaining the stability and activity of cervical vertebrae.
ObjectiveTo explore the fusion effect of allograft Cages on transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF).MethodsThe clinical data of 30 patients (38 vertebral segments) who underwent TLIF with allograft interbody fusion Cages between January 2015 and January 2017 were retrospectively analysed. There were 25 males and 5 females with an average age of 56.9 years (range, 44-72 years). The lesions included 20 cases of lumbar disc herniation, 7 cases of lumbar spondylolisthesis, and 3 cases of lumbar spinal stenosis. The operation section included 4 cases of L3, 4, 13 cases of L4, 5, 5 cases of L5, S1, 6 cases of L4, 5-L5, S1, and 2 cases of L3, 4-L4, 5. The disease duration was 6-36 months (mean, 12 months). The clinical effectiveness was evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Oswestry disability index (ODI), and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score at preoperation, 3 months and 6 months after operation, and last follow-up. The fusion rate was evaluated by anteroposterior and lateral X-ray films and CT three-dimensional reconstruction at 3 and 6 months after operation. The intervertebral space height was measured on anteroposterior and lateral X-ray films at preoperation, 3 days, 3 months, and 6 months after operation.ResultsThe operation time was 2.1-4.3 hours (mean, 3.1 hours), and the intraoperative blood loss was 150-820 mL (mean, 407.5 mL). The follow-up time was 8-25 months (mean, 16.4 months). One Cage split at 6 months after operation without Cage movement and neurologic symptoms; none of the other patients had Cage prolapse, displacement, and fragmentation. No local or systemic allergy or infection signs was found in all patients. No nerve compression or symptoms was observed during the follow-up. The postoperative VAS score, ODI score, and JOA score improved significantly when compared with preoperative scores (P<0.05); and the scores at 6 months and at last follow-up were significantly improved when compared with those at 3 months after operation (P<0.05); but no significant difference was found between at 6 months and at last follow-up (P>0.05). The fusion rate was 55.3% (21/38), 92.1% (35/38), and 100% (38/38) at 3 months, 6 months, and last follow-up postoperatively. The intervertebral space height was increased significantly at 3 days, 3 months, 6 months, and last follow-up postoperatively when compared with preoperative ones (P<0.05); and the loss of intervertebral space height was significant at last follow-up when compared with postoperative at 3 days (P<0.05).ConclusionThe allograft interbody fusion Cage contributes to the spine interbody fusion by providing an earlier stability and higher fusion rate.
Objective To summarize the basic research and the cl inical appl ication of biodegradable interbody fusion Cage. Methods Recent l iterature concerning biodegradable interbody fusion Cage at home and abroad was extensively reviewed, and current developments of the basic research and the cl inical appl ication of biodegradable interbody fusion Cage were investigated. Results Basic research showes that the stiffness of biodegradable interbody fusion Cage is lower than that of metall ic Cage, so it can enhance interbody fusion. As interbody fusion proceeded, biodegradable interbody fusion Cage degrades constantly, but the speed of degradation can not keep in parallel with that of fusion. In addition, the tissue response to degradation products is controversy. Cl inical appl ication showes that the biodegradable interbody fusion Cage can enhance interbody fusion and maintain disc space height. The short term results are good, however, the long term results need further observation. Conclusion Biodegradable interbody fusion Cage can effectively enhance interbody fusion.
Objective To compare the clinical outcomes of posterior lumbar interbody fusion（PLIF） using simple cage alone fusion with pedicle screw fixationand autogenous bone grafting and cage fusion with pedicle screw fixation in adult spondylolisthesis. Methods From March 2003 to March 2004，Twenty-seven patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis were divided in two groups. In group A, 15 patients were treated by PLIF using simple cage alone fusion with pedicle screw fixation, including 4 males and 11 females, aging 53-68 years. Isthmic defectswere located at L4 in 9 cases, at L5 in 6 cases. Four patients were smokers.Thepreoperative mean disc space height was 5.4±2.3 mm, the mean percentage of slip was 36.8％±7.2%. In group B, 12 patients were treated by PLIF using autogenous bone grafting and cage fusion with pedicle screw fixation, including 3 males and 9 females, aging 56 years. Isthmic defects were located at L4 in 8 cases, atL5 in 4 cases. Five patients were smokers. The preoperative mean disc space height was 5.7±2.5 mm, the mean percentage of slip was 37.8%±6.2%. Two groupswere compared in the amount of blood loss, duration of hospitalization, back pain, radiating pain, fusion rate, the intervertebral disc space height, the postoperative degree of slip and the fusion rate. Results All patientswere followed up for 24-38 months. The mean follow-up was 29(24-36) months in group A and26(24-38) months in group B. There were no statistically significant differences infollow-up period, age,sex, the location of isthmic defects, smoking, the preoperative disc space height and the percentage of slip between two groups (Pgt;0.05).There were no statistically significant differences in the amount of blood loss, the duration of hospitalization, the fusion time between two groups(Pgt;0.05). But there were statistically significant differences in the back pain score, the radiating pain score and the fusion rate between two groups(Plt;0.05).Thepo stoperative disc space height and the degree of slip of the last follow-up were5.8±2.2 mm and 25.6％±7.2% in group A, 6.2±2.5 mm and 24.1％±7.4 % ingroupB, showing statistically significant difference (Plt;0.05). Conclusion The PLIF using autogenous bone grafting and cage fusion with pedicle screw fixations ismore beneficial to improving the fusion rate and preventing longterm instabilities than simple cage alone fusion with pedicle screw fixation in adult spondylolisthesis.
ObjectiveTo explore the long-term effectiveness of expandable Cage in treatment of degenerative lumbar disease. MethodsBetween January 2005 and January 2008, 72 patients with degenerative lumbar disease were treated by expandable Cage and followed up for 5 years. Of 72 cases, 41 were male and 31 were female with an average age of 40.5 years (mean, 35-65 years), including 35 cases of lumbar spinal stenosis, 20 cases of degenerative lumbar instability, and 17 cases of serious lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion combined with lumbar instability. The disease duration was 6-28 months (mean, 9 months). The affected lumbar segments were L3, 4 in 6 patients, L4, 5 in 37 patients, and L5, S1 in 29 patients. The Oswestry disability index (ODI) was used to evaluate the effectiveness before and after operation and to calculate the improvement rate. During the follow-up, the anteroposterior, lateral, and dynamic X-ray films were taken to evaluate the operated segment fusion rate. The intervertebral lordosis angle was measured, and adjacent segment degeneration was observed. ResultsThe operation time was 35-90 minutes (mean, 65 minutes); the intraoperative blood loss was 200-450 mL (mean, 280 mL), and all the patients received intraoperative autologous blood transfusion; the postoperative bedridden time was 3-7 days (mean, 4.5 days); the hospitalization days were 10-18 days (mean, 12 days). No complications of nerve root injury, cauda equina injury, or cerebrospinal fluid leakage occurred during operation. All patients achieved primary healing of the incisions. All 72 patients were followed up for 5 years. At 3 months, 1 year, and 5 years after operation, the ODI were 8.2±2.6, 6.9±1.9, and 6.4±1.3 respectively, showing significant differences when compared with preoperative value (41.5±3.5) (P<0.05); the improvement rates were 87.3%±1.2%, 90.1%±0.8%, and 91.6%±1.3% respectively, showing no significant difference (F=0.492, P=0.375); the intervertebral lordosis angles were (5.1±1.2), (5.0±0.5), and (5.4±0.8)°respectively, showing no significant difference (F=0.570, P=0.453). At 5 years after operation, the intervertebral fusion rate was 100%, with no adjacent segment degeneration. ConclusionUsing expandable Cage to treat degenerative lumbar disease can get stabilization without pedicle screw fixation, the good effectiveness is shown after long-term follow-up.
ObjectiveTo assesse the effectiveness of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with Cage alone in treating multi-level cervical degenerative disease. MethodsBetween August 2010 and August 2012, 62 eligible patients with multi-level cervical degenerative disease were treated, and the clinical data were reviewed. Of 62 patients, 32 underwent anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with Cage alone (group A), and 30 underwent anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with plate fixation (group B). Both groups showed no significant difference in gender, age, disease duration, lesion types, and affected segments (P>0.05), it had comparability. Clinical outcomes were assessed using Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score and visual analogue scale (VAS) score; the fused segment height, subsidence rates of Cages, global cervical lordosis, and fusion rates were also compared. ResultsThe operation time of group B[(109.7±11.2) minutes] was significantly more than group A[(87.8±6.9) minutes] (t=-2.259, P=0.037). Primary healing of incisions was obtained in all patients of 2 groups. All patients were followed up; the follow-up period ranged from 8 to 27 months (mean, 15.8 months) in group A, and from 9 to 28 months (mean, 16.4 months) in group B. There was no complication and internal fixation failure. The JOA score and VAS score were significantly improved at last follow-up when compared with preoperative scores in 2 groups (P<0.05). According to Robinson standard for axial symptom severity, the results were excellent in 20 cases, good in 9, fair in 2, and poor in 1, with an excellent and good rate of 90.63% in group A; the results were excellent in 19 cases, good in 7, fair in 3, and poor in 1, with an excellent and good rate of 86.67% in group B; and no significant difference was found between 2 groups (χ2=0.765, P=0.382). The fused segment height at immediate after operation and at last follow-up and global cervical lordosis at last follow-up were significantly improved when compared with preoperative ones in 2 groups (P<0.05). There was no significant difference (P>0.05) between groups A and B in the Cage subsidence height[(1.4±0.9) mm vs. (1.2±1.6) mm], Cage subsidence rate[9.52% (8/84) vs. 7.59% (6/79)], and fusion rate[95.24% (80/84) vs. 96.20% (76/79)]. ConclusionAnterior cervical discectomy and fusion with Cage alone can obtain good clinical results and radiologic indexes, avoid plate-related complications and reduce operation time. It is a safe and effective surgical option in the treatment of multi-level cervical degenerative disease.
ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness and imaging features between implanting single and double Cage into intervertebral body through unilateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). MethodsThe clinical data were collected and analyzed from 104 patients who underwent unilateral TLIF between January 2013 and October 2014, who were divided into 2 groups:single Cage was implanted into intervertebral body in 64 cases (76 segments) in traditional group, and double Cage was implanted into intervertebral body in 56 cases (70 segments) in reformative group. There was no significant difference in age, gender, bone mineral density, operation segments between 2 groups (P>0.05). The visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), and Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores were used to evaluate the effectiveness; the area of intervertebral bone-graft, fusion rate, height of intervertebral space, and the number of Cage subsidence were measured by CT scan. ResultsAll the patients were followed up 12.85 months on average (range, 9-15 months). The VAS, ODI, and JOA scores were significantly improved at each time point after operation when compared with preoperative values (P<0.05), and no significant difference was found between 2 groups (P>0.05) except VAS and ODI at 12 months after operation (P<0.05). However, the area of intervertebral bone-graft in reformative group[(5.94±1.17) cm2] was significantly larger than that in traditional group[(4.81±0.97) cm2] at 7 days after operation (t=-6.365, P=0.000). At 3 and 12 months after operation, the fusion rate was respectively 84.2% and 92.1% in traditional group and was respectively 88.6% and 94.3% in reformative group. Although the height of intervertebral space were increased when compared with preoperative height, the incidence rates of Cages subsidence in traditional group were 44.74% and 47.37% respectively at 3 and 12 months after operation and were significantly higher those that in reformative group (11.43% and 14.29% respectively) (P<0.05). In addition, the height difference between affected side and normal side in traditional group was significantly larger than that in reformative group (P<0.05). ConclusionBoth single and double Cage implanted into the intervertebral body through unilateral TLIF have good effectiveness. However, double Cage implanted into intervertebral body may hold the height of intervertebral space, reduce the incident rate of Cage subsidence, and prevent sagittal imbalance.