To investigate the pathological characteristics, diagnosis and treatment of rectal carcinoid tumors, 26 cases, which had been diagnosed and treated in our hospital from 1987 to 1997, were retrospectively analysed. The rectoscopic examination were taken in all 26 patients and final diagnosis were made by pathological examination, among them, 19 cases were treated with local resection or expensively local resection, 7 cases with radical operation because the diameter of tumor was beyond 2 cm. These patiests were followed up 1-10 years with 5 patients died. The authors consider that rectoscopic examination and biopsy are important method to diagnose rectal carcinoid tumors preoperatively, in addition, for suspicious case, argentation and immunohistochemistry staining should be further made besides routine HE staining. The operative treatment is the best therapy to this kind of disease, the choice of operative mode must be made according to the size, infiltration of the tumor, the condition of infiltrated lymph node and hepatic metastasis.
Fifteen patients with rectal carcinoid tumors were treated from 1975 to 1991. Before admision, nine patients (60%) had been misdiagnosed as polyps ,hemorrhoids or proctitis. Diagnosis may be delayed because of failure to recognize their charasteristics and by the negligeuce of doing digital examination or proctoscopy. Some aspects of the management of these tumors remain controversial. However, present-day treatment programs call for radical cancer resections only for lesions 2cm in diameter or larger, and local resections for all others. In reviewing this series of cases and other studies, we advocate that both the size of the lesion and the depth of tumor invasion should be taken as the criteria of surgical managements. If the tumor is 2cm in diameter, or smaller than that, local resection can be performed, but whenever the nuscularis propria is invaded, radical resection should be performed. Radical resection is bly indicated for tumors larger than 2cm.
Objective To investigate the clinicopathological characteristics and factors influencing the prognosis of rectal carcinoid. Methods Clinical data of 31 cases with rectal careinoid, which identified diagnosis through operation and pathologic examination from January 2003 to March 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. Primary tumors were classified by size （≤1.0 cm， 1.0-2.0 cm， and ＞2.0 cm）and muscularis invasion respectively, compared therapeutic effect of different groups. Results Median age of 31 cases was 49 years (22-83 years). Median follow-up time was 36 months (15-86 months), follow-up rate was 80.6% （25 /31）. During the follow-up period, there were no cases with recurrence among the 15 patients with tumor size≤l.0 cm, 1 case recurred in the 7 patients with turmor size between 1.0 cm to 2.0 cm, and 2 cases died from postoperative liver metastasis among the 3 patients with tumor size＞2.0 cm.There were relations between the tumor size, invasion depth, and metastasis （P＜0.05）. Metastasis and invasion depth of tumor were possibility increment to follow the aggrandizement of the diameter of rectal carcinoid. Conclusion The diameter of rectal carcinoid and muscularis invasion may be important factors affecting survival, which may be an important basis for the choice of operative mode.