Objective To investigate the gastrointestinal(GI) protective effect of Omeprazole on children undergoing thoracoscopic heart surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Methods One hundred and twenty seven patients who were scheduled for cardiac surgery with CPB were randomly equally divided into three groups. Group A and B underwent thoracoscopic heart surgery, while the control group underwent conventional heart surgery by sternotomy. Before CPB, group A was treated with Omeprazole 10mg added to the priming solution.? Group B and the control group were treated by adding the same amount of normal saline (to the priming solution). pH and red blood cell count of gastric secretion and serum gastric level (Assay Designs ELISA) were measured at the following intervals: before CPB, 30 minutes into CPB, at termination of CPB,4 and 24 hours after termination of CPB. Results Compare to prior to CBP, the value of the gastric pH in group A was significantly higher (Plt;0.01), and that of group B was significantly lower (Plt;0.05)at the end of CPB. The same value in the control group was significantly lower (Plt;0.05)4h, after the end of CPB. Compared to prior CPB, the mean red blood cell count of gastric secretion and serum gastric level were significantly descent (Plt;0.01) in all there group post CBP. Compare to the control group, the mean gastric pH level in group A was significantly elevated at all time intervals post CBP; while the mean gastric secretin red blood cell count was significantly decreased. The mean serum level in group A 30 min post CBP was significantly lower than that in group B and the control group. Compared to the control group, the mean gastric pH level was significantly lower in group B but returned to the pre-CPB level in 24 h. The mean gastric secretin red blood cell amount and serums gastric level in group B at all time intervals were significantly decreased compare to those of the control group. Conclusion Thoracoscopic heart surgery of children with CPB
ObjectiveTo compare the clinical efficacy of small incision with traditional thoractomy for aortic valve replacement.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 78 patients with heart valve replacement in our hospital between May 2014 and June 2016. The patients were divided into a small incision group and an open chest group with 39 patients in each group. In the small incision group, 18 males and 21 females, aged 56.4±10.8 years, underwent cardiac surgery with a small incision. And in the open chest group, 17 males and 22 females, aged 57.1±9.7 years, underwent cardiac surgery by thoracotomy.ResultsThe extracorporeal circulation time, aortic cross clamping time of the small incision group were longer than those of the open chest group (P<0.05). But the amount of intraoperative blood transfusion and postoperative 24 h drainage volume of the small incision group were significantly less than those of the open chest group (P<0.05). Postoperative mechanical ventilation time, and postoperative hospitalization time of the small incision group were significantly shorter than those of the open chest group (P<0.05). Pain score of the small incision group was significantly lower than that of the open chest group significantly (P<0.05). There was no statistical difference in complications rate between the two groups after 6 months (P>0.05).ConclusionCompared with traditional open chest cardiac surgery, small incision cardiac surgery is effective and safe, and is worth popularizing in clinic.