ObjectiveTo compare difference in the establishment of animal model of cartilage defect by resection of medial collateral ligament and meniscus and by cartilage excavation so as to provide a proper way for the choose of animal model preparation of catilage defect. MethodsTen healthy beagles, male or female, weighing 5.0-10.0 kg, were randomly divided into 3 groups. Resection of knee collateral ligament and meniscus was performed on 4 beagles of group A, cartilage excavation of knee-joints in 4 beagles of group B, and no treatment on 2 beagles of group C as controls. At 16 weeks after modeling, MRI, gross observation, HE staining, Safranin O staining, and toluidine blue staining were performed, and Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) score was recorded. ResultsMRI and histology observation showed no obvious cartilage defect in group A; obvious cartilage defects were observed in group B and gross observation showed dramatic dark red cartilage defects. OARSI score was significantly lower in group A (0.940±0.574) than group B (4.500±0.516) (t=18.461, P=0.000). ConclusionThe cartilage excavation is better than resection of both meniscus and medial collateral ligament, which provides a good method of establishing an animal model of cartilage defect at 16 weeks after operation.