Objective To systematically evaluate the diagnostic value of TERC gene on high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HGSIL) of the cervix. Methods Such databases as PubMed, EMbase, and The Cochrane Library were searched by March 31, 2012. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the literature was screened and the data were extracted. The quality was evaluated in accordance with the quality assessment tool for diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS) and the meta-analysis was conducted by using Meta-Disc 1.4 software. Result A total of 12 studies involving 7 894 cases were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that the sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic odds ratios of TERC gene on HGSIL of cervix were 0.81 (95%CI 0.80 to 0.82), 0.83 (95%CI 0.82 to 0.84), 17.37 (95%CI 8.77 to 34.41), respectively. Conclusions The diagnostic value of TERC gene were medium in diagnosing HGSIL of the cervix alone, and it can be used as an optional method in clinical diagnosis.
Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy (LNSRH) in treatment of early cervical cancer. Methods Such databases as CBM (1960 to September 2011), CENTRAL (1966 to September 2011), MEDLINE (1966 to September 2011), The Cochrane Library, EMbase (1974 to September 2011) and CNKI (1994 to September 2011) were searched on computer, and relevant magazines were also searched manually. Data were extracted and the quality was assessed after including studies according to exclusive criteria, then meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.1 software. Results Total 7 studies involving 506 cases were selected, of which 255 cases were in the LNSRH group and the other 251 cases were in the laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) group. There were no differences between the two groups in age, body mass index, clinical stage, pathological type and histological grade. The results of meta-analysis showed that: a) The operative time of LNSRH was longer than LRH, with significant difference (P=0.02). But there was no significant difference in intraoperative bleeding between the two groups (P=0.69); b) The length of dissected parametrium of LNSRH was shorter than LRH with significant difference (P=0.02). But there was no significant difference in the length of dissected vagina (P=0.69); and c) The functional recovery of the bladder in the LNSRH group was better than LRH (Plt;0.000 01). Conclusion LNSRH is safe and feasible in effectively alleviating the postoperative dysfunction of the bladder in early cervical cancer as well as in improving the quality of life for patients. It is regarded as a new model of operation. Because it has just been put into practice within a short time, and there is lack of multi-center, large-sample, prospective controlled studies at present, so its radical effectiveness, long-term recurrence rate, survival rate, etc. have not yet been confirmed. More high quality studies are needed to provide important data of comparison between LNSRH and LRH.
Objective To evaluate the clinical effect and safety of nerve sparing radical hysterectomy(NSRH) for cervical cancer compared with radical hysterectomy (RH). Methods We searched the Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 2010), MEDLINE (1960 to March, 2010), EMbase (1960 to March, 2010), CBM (1960 to March, 2010), VIP (1960 to March, 2010) and CNKI (1960 to March, 2010), and hand searched related literatures. With a defined search strategy, both randomized controlled trials and controlled clinical trials of comparing NSRH with RH for cervical cancer were identified. Data were extracted and evaluated by two reviewers independently. The quality of the included trials was evaluated by Cochrane’s evaluation criterion. Meta-analysis was conducted with the Cochrane collaboration’s RevMan 4.2.2 software. Results Nine controlled clinical trials involving 742 patients were identified. The meta-analysis showed that: a) There was statistical significance in postoperative recovery of bladder function between two groups; compared with RH, NSRH was much better in aspects of the recovery time of post void residual urine volume (PVR) (WMD= – 5.80, 95%CI – 6.22 to – 5.37), the bladder dysfunction morbidity (RR=0.43, 95%CI (0.26 to 0.75), and the urodynamic study; b) The operation time of NSRH was longer than that of RH with a significant difference (WMD=37.23, 95%CI 12.84 to 61.61); c) There was no significant difference between two groups in bleeding amount (WMD=19.66, 95%CI – 51.57 to 90.90); d) There was no significant difference between two groups in both survival rate and recurrent rate (RR=0.79, 95%CI 0.17 to 3.58); e) There was no significant difference between two groups in resection extension and pathologic outcome, such as, infiltration around uterus and vessels; f) One trail showed a significant difference between two groups that NSRH seldom led to anorectal and sexual dysfunction. Conclusions Compared with RH, NSRH can quickly improve the postoperative recovery of bladder, anorectal and sexual functions, but haven’t larger quantity of operative bleeding, larger resection extension, lower survival rates and higher recurrence rates except longer operation time. NSRH can improve the quality of postoperative life and is safe. However, the trails available for this systematic review were limited, as well as non-randomized controlled trails. Some outcomes were only included by one trail. So there is no confirmed conclusion about these. The prospective randomized controlled trials are required for further investigation.
Objective To investigate the expression of COX-2 in human cervical cancer and explore their relationship between the COX-2 expression and the clinicopathologic characteristic of cervical cancer. Methods The published studies were searched in the CBMdisc (1979 to 2009), CNKI (1979 to 2009), VIP (1989 to 2009) and WANFANG Database (1982 to 2009), and other relevant journals were also hand searched, to identify all the relevant case-control trials. The quality of the included studies was assessed. The Cochrane Collaboration’s software RevMan 4.2.10 was used to test the heterogeneity, overall effect and publication bias of the combined studies. Results A total of 9 studies were recruited. As for the positive rate of COX-2 expression, significant differences was tested between cervical cancer vs. normal cervical tissues, lymph node metastasi vs. non-lymph node metastasi, clinical stages I-II vs. clinical stages III-IV, cell differentiation G1 vs. cell differentiation G2-G3 and cervical squamous cell carcinoma vs. adenocarcinoma with OR (95%CI) at 28.03 (9.53 to 82.50), 5.16 (3.36 to 7.93), 0.53 (0.33 to 0.84), 3.11 (1.86 to 5.22) and 5.00 (2.68 to 9.35) respectively. Conclusions According to the domestic evidence, higher COX-2 expression might be associated with cervical cancer. However, more high quality case-control studies are expected for further study.
ObjectiveTo establish two-dimensional electrophoresis profiles with high resolution and reproducibility from subcellular immortalized human endocervical cell (H8) and cervical cancer cell (Caski), and to identify the differential expressions of subcellular proteins (cytoplasmic, membranous and nuclear proteins). MethodsH8 cells and Caski cells were incubated, and subcellular proteins of H8 cells and Caski cells were extracted and separated by means of immobilized pH gradient-based two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DE). Then the selected differential protein spots were analyzed by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS) and SWISS-PROT database. ResultsWe obtained well-resolved, reproducible 2-DE patterns; 6 differentially expressed cytoplasmic proteins and 3 differentially expressed membranous proteins and 9 differentially expressed nuclear proteins were defined in 2-DE gels. ConclusionSubcellular proteins of cervical precancerous lesion and cervical cancer are separated and analyzed by means of 2-DE and MALDI-TOF-MS/MS. There are significant differences between H8 cells and Caski cells. These data may be valuable for research of cervical precancerous lesion and cervical cancer, or as diagnostic markers and therapeutic targets for cervical cancer.
ObjectiveTo analyze the relative factors of lymph-nodes metastasis (LM) in patients with cervical cancer. MethodsThe clinico-pathological data of 136 patients with stageⅠ A-Ⅱ A of cervical cancer who underwent surgical therapy from January 2005 to December 2010 were retrospectively analyzed. The correlation between clinico-pathological parameters and LM was analyzed by univariable χ2 analysis and multivariable logistic analysis. ResultsThe total LM rate (LMR) was 14.0% (19/136). The rate of LM in obturator was the highest (63.2%), and then the rate between the external and internal iliac was 42.1%. The rate of deep inguinal lymph nodes and para-aortic lymph node was 0.0%. There was correlation between the clinic staging, depth of stromal invasion, histologic subtype, parametrial invasion, vaginal invasion and LM in univariable analysis (P<0.05). While in multivariable analysis, the correlation with LM was only existed between the clinic staging, histologic subtype, depth of stromal invasion and LM. ConclusionClinic staging, histologic subtype, depth of stromal invasion are high risk factors of LM.
ObjectiveTo compare the dosimetric differences among the double-arc volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT), 7 field intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) techniques in treatment planning for cervical cancer as adjuvant radiotherapy. MethodFifteen patients who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy for cervical cancer between March 1st and September 30th, 2013 were chosen to be our study subjects through random sampling. Under Pinnacle 9.2 planning system, the same CT image was designed through three different techniques:VMAT, IMRT and 3D-CRT. We then compared target zone fitness index, evenness index, D98%, D2%, D50% among those different techniques. Monitor unit (MU) and treatment time were also analyzed. ResultsThree techniques showed similar target dose coverage. The IMRT and VMAT plans achieved better target dose conformity, which reduced the V20 of the pelvic, the V50 of the rectum and bladder, as well as the V40/50 of the small intestine (P<0.05). The VMAT technique showed few dosimetric advantages over the IMRT technique. VMAT technique had the advantages of less MU (P>0.05) and shorter overall treatment time (P<0.01) compared with IMRT technique. ConclusionsThe IMRT and VMAT plans achieve similar dose distribution to the target, and are superior to the 3D-CRT plans, in adjuvant radiotherapy for cervical cancer. VMAT technique has the advantages of less MU and shorter overall treatment time.
ObjectiveTo investigate the screening value of cervical fluid-based cytology test (TCT), high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) test, and colposcopy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and cervical cancer in high-risk populations. MethodsA total of 466 patients between January 2013 and January 2015 with a history of intercourse bleeding were enrolled in this study, and the screening value of TCT, HR-HPV test and colposcopy for CIN and cervical cancer were retrospectively evaluated. ResultsIn the 466 patients, 165 were diagnosed with cervical inflammation, 116 with CIN, 182 with grade 2-3 CIN, and 3 with cervical cancer. The colposcopy had the highest sensitivity (84.1%), the lowest specificity (59.4%), high false positive rate (40.6%), low false negative rate (15.9%), and the highest negative predictive value (67.1%). The TCT had the highest specificity (84.8%) and the lowest false positive rate (15.2%). The indicators of HR-HPV were between those of TCT and colposcopy. There were significant differences in terms of these indicators among the three methods (P < 0.05). And the positive prediction value of HR-HPV was the highest (84.5%), while the negative prediction value of colposcopy was the highest (67.1%). There was a significant difference in the predictive value among the three methods (P < 0.05). The consistency of either TCT or HR-HPV alone with pathological diagnosis was poor (K=0.213, 0.343), while that of colposcopy was moderate (K=0.446). Combination of TCT and HR-HPV could significantly improve the diagnosis sensitivity (93.0%) with a lower false negative rate (7.0%); Youden index was 0.736, and the consistency with pathological examination was high (K=0.748). ConclusionsFor high-risk population with a history of intercourse bleeding or other abnormal cervical disorders, the screening sensitivity of TCT and HR-HPV alone for CIN and cervical cancer is low with a high false negative rate. Colposcopy has a high sensitivity and a low specificity. By combination of TCT and HR-HPV, the validity, reliability and predictive values can be improved significantly, and the sensitivity is high with a low false negative rate and a high consistency with pathological examination.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the correlation between the expression of survivin and cervical cancer and its clinical pathologic features. MethodsSystematic and comprehensive literature was searched in The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2013), PubMed, MEDLINE (Ovid), CNKI, CBM and WanFang Data from inception to May 2013, to retrieve case-control studies published in the foreign and domestic areas on the correlation between the expression of survivin and cervical cancer and its clinical pathologic features. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted the data, and evaluated the quality of the included studies. Then meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.1 software. ResultsA total of 13 studies involving 1 530 women (658 cervical cancer patients, 563 cervical intraepithelial neoplasis (CIN), 658 normal cervical. The results of meta-analysis showed that, a) as for the positive rate of survivin expression, significant differences were found between cervical cancer and CIN (OR=4.63, 95%CI 3.49 to 6.13, P < 0.000 01), cervical cancer and normal cervical tissues (OR=38.23, 95%CI 23.92 to 61.11, P < 0.000 01), and CIN and normal cervical tissues (OR=9.61, 95%CI 6.11 to 15.09, P < 0.000 01). b) Significant differences were found between clinical stages Ⅰ-Ⅱ and clinical stages Ⅲ-Ⅳ (OR=0.17, 95%CI 0.07 to 0.41, P < 0.000 1), cervical cancer with lymph node metastasis and that without lymph node metastasis (OR=3.57, 95%CI 2.20 to 5.78, P < 0.000 01), high and moderate/low differentiated ESCC tissues (OR=0.31, 95%CI 0.13 to 0.76, P=0.01), and shallow and deep muscular infiltration (OR=0.12, 95%CI 0.02 to 0.68, P=0.02). No significant difference was found between cervical cancer with laterouterus or haemal infiltration and that without latero-uterus or haemal infiltration (OR=24.15, 95%CI 0.07 to 8 199.76, P=0.28). ConclusionCurrent foreign and domestic evidence shows that, survivin expression is significantly correlated to cervical cancer and its clinically pathologic features, which may participate in the whole course of carcinogenesis of cervical cancer, but it is not considered to be an absolute factor for estimating the survival rate of patients with cervical cancer. Due to the quality limitation of the included studies, more large scale, well-designed and high quality studies are needed for further verifying the aforementioned conclusion.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of radio-chemotherapy combined with thermotherapy for cervical cancer. MethodsLiterature about the efficacy and safety of radio-chemotherapy combined with thermotherapy for patients with cervical cancer at mid-term/advanced stage was retrieved from digital databases of The Cochrane Library (Issue 7, 2013), PubMed, EMbase, CBM, VIP, CNKI, and WanFang Data, and from their established dates to July, 2013. Data extraction and quality assessment of included studies were conducted by two reviewers independently. RevMan 5.2 software was then used to perform meta-analysis. ResultsA total of 9 randomized controlled trials involving 693 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that, compared with the radio-chemotherapy alone group, the radio-chemotherapy combined with thermotherapy group had significant increased 1-year survival rates (OR=3.05, 95%CI 1.70 to 6.68, P=0.005), 2-year survival rates (OR=2.29, 95%CI 1.19 to 4.38, P=0.01), and overall effective rates (OR=3.66, 95%CI 2.31 to 5.81, P < 0.000 01). The incidence of adverse reactions was no statistically significant between the two groups. ConclusionRadio-chemotherapy combined with thermotherapy improves long-term survival rates and short-term curative effects for patients with cervical cancer at mid-term/advanced stage. However, due to the limited quantity and quality of the included studies, more high quality studies with large sample size and long-term follow-up are still needed to verify the above conclusion.