west china medical publishers
Keyword
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Keyword "Cervical tuberculosis" 2 results
  • APPLICATION AND COMPARISON OF ALLOGRAFT AND AUTOGRAFT BONE FOR INTERBODY FUSION IN CERVICAL TUBERCULOSIS

    Objective To evaluate the cl inical results of allogeneic bone graft for interbody fusion in cervical tuberculosis. Methods Between January 2000 and January 2008, 30 cases of cervical tuberculosis were treated with allogeneic (group A, n=15) or autologous (group B, n=15) il iac crest bone graft combined with anterior fixation after radical debridement. In group A, there were 8 males and 7 females with an average age of 38 years; the disease duration was 6 to 14 months; the preoperative kyphosis Cobb angle was (8.6 ± 11.3)°; the preoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score was 13.0 ± 3.1 for neurological function; and the length of bone graft was 32 mm on average. In group B, there were 9males and 6 females with an average age of 42 years; the disease duration was 4 to 17 months; the preoperative kyphosis Cobb angle was (4.9 ± 7.4)°; the preoperative JOA score 12.3 ± 4.2; and the length of bone graft was 34 mm on average. There was no significant difference in general data between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). Results The operation time and bleeding volume in group A were significantly less than those in group B (P lt; 0.05). Wound effusion were found in 2 cases of group A, and the other incisions healed by first intention. No infection occurred in group B. In group A, 13 cases were followed up 12-48 months; in group B, 14 cases were followed up 13-46 months. The time of bone graft heal ing in group A [(7.6 ± 2.1) months] was significantly longer than that in group B [(4.2 ± 1.1) months] (t=2.773, P=0.005). The kyphosis Cobb angles were significantly improved at 6 months and last follow-up after operation in 2 groups when compared with that before operation (P lt; 0.05), but no significant difference was found between 2 groups at different time after operation (P gt; 0.05). There was no significant difference in JOA score at 6 months after operation between group A (14.1 ± 2.6) and group B (14.3 ± 2.4) (t=1.655, P=0.162). The improvement rate for neural function were 83.7% in group A and 87.8% in group B, showing no significant difference (χ2=3.150, P=0.071). There was no loosening of internal fixation and recurrence of tuberculosis in 2 groups during follow-up. Five cases had chronic pain at il iac donor sites in group B. According to Bridwell et al. evaluation standard, the bone fusion was satisfactory in 11 cases (84.6%) and unsatisfactory in 2 cases (15.4%) in group A, and was satisfactory for all in 14 cases (100%) in group B. The satisfactory rate of bone fusion showed no significant difference between 2 groups (χ2=2.680, P=0.115).Conclusion Allogeneic bone grafting has a good cl inical result for spinal fusion in cervical tuberculosis surgery, which can treat tuberculosis bone defect effectively.

    Release date:2016-08-31 05:42 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Application progress of implantation in surgical treatment of cervical tuberculosis

    ObjectiveTo review the characteristics and applications of different implantation in cervical tuberculosis surgery and the research progress of the new implantation. MethodsBy consulting relevant domestic and foreign research literature on cervical tuberculosis, the classification, advantages, disadvantages, and prospects of implantations were analyzed and summarized. ResultsThe incidence of cervical tuberculosis has increased recently and has a high disability rate. Currently, the implantation in the surgical treatment of cervical tuberculosis are mainly divided into bone materials, metal materials, and bioactive materials; the above materials have their own advantages and disadvantages, for example, the amount of autologous bone is limited, the complications of allogeneic bone are common, and the bone fusion effect of metal materials is poor. With the development of science and technology, the implantation are also more diverse. ConclusionThe choice of the implantation affects the bone fusion directly, furthermore, it affects the effectiveness of cervical tuberculosis, the development of new implantation provides a variety of options for the treatment of cervical tuberculosis.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
1 pages Previous 1 Next

Format

Content