ObjectiveTo compare the effects of aerobic exercise, resistance exercise, aerobic combined with resistance exercise, routine nursing and no intervention on depression and anxiety in adolescents by means of network meta-analysis. MethodsA computer search was conducted in CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP, CBM, Web of Science, EBSCO, PubMed, Cochrane Library and Embase to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) related to exercise intervention for depression and anxiety in children and adolescents from inception to April 2023. After two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data and evaluated the methodological quality of the included studies, Stata 14.0 and RevMan 5.3 software were used for statistical analysis. ResultsFinally 27 RCTs were included, covering 3 210 children and adolescents. The results of the network meta-analysis showed that in terms of improving depression, resistance exercise (SMD=−0.37, 95%CI −0.64 to −0.10, P<0.05) and aerobic exercise (SMD=−0.19, 95%CI −0.34 to −0.04, P<0.01) were significantly better than the no intervention group; in relieving anxiety, aerobic exercise (SMD=−0.29, 95%CI −0.54 to −0.03, P<0.05) was significantly better than the no intervention group. In improving self-worth, aerobic combined with resistance exercise (SMD=0.26, 95%CI 0.01 to 0.52, P<0.05) was statistically different from the no intervention group. The results of SUCRA probability sequence showed that in reducing depression, resistance exercise (95.0%) > aerobic exercise (64.4%) > aerobic combined with resistance exercise (60.7%) > routine nursing (22.9%) > no intervention (7.0%). In relieving anxiety, aerobic exercise (72.4%) > routine nursing (69.0%) > aerobic combined with resistance exercise (55.3%) > no intervention (3.4%). In improving self-worth, aerobic combined with resistance exercise (94.0%) > resistance exercise (67.3%) > aerobic exercise (35.1%) > no intervention (32.7%) > routine nursing (21.0%). ConclusionLimited evidence suggests that resistance exercise has advantages in improving depression in children and adolescents, aerobic exercise has advantages in relieving anxiety in children and adolescents, and aerobic combined with resistance exercise has advantages in improving self-worth in children and adolescents. Due to the limitation of the number and quality of included studies, more high-quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusions.
ObjectivesTo evaluate the improvement of symptoms in patients with moderate to severe asthma aged 5-18 years treated with GINA (Global Initiative for Asthma) guidelines by network meta-analysis. Methods Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about asthma patients aged 5 to 18 years with reported asthma symptom scores were collected from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP, SinoMed and clinical trial registry platform (ClinicalTrials.gov). The search time limit was from the inception to August 26, 2023. After two researchers independently screened literature, extracted data and evaluated the risk of bias of included studies, Stata 15.0 software was used for network meta-analysis. ResultsA total of 23 studies were included, 23 of which reported daytime asthma symptom scores. Compared with symptom scores in the low-dose ICS group, there was a statistically significant difference in improvement of daytime symptoms between low-dose ICS+LABA+LTRA (SMD=−1.4, 95%CI −1.99 to −0.81) and low-dose ICS+LABA+SABA (SMD=−1.43, 95%CI −2.48 to −0.39). Symptom scores for nighttime asthma were reported in 20 RCTs, and there was a statistically significant difference in symptom scores for low-dose ICS+LABA+LTRA (SMD=−1.20, 95%CI −2.20 to −0.21) compared with the low-dose ICS group. After the ranking of efficacy, the number one asthma symptom score in both daytime and nighttime was low-dose ICS+LABA+LTRA group. ConclusionLow dose ICS+LABA+LTRA has the best efficacy in improving daytime and nighttime asthma symptom scores.