ObjectiveTo observe apoptosis and proliferation of choledochus wall epithelial cell and fibrocyte, to understand the effects of apoptosis and proliferation on choledochal cyst development.MethodsThirty two cases of cystic dilatation,35 cases of cylindrical dilatation，and 25 cases of cholangiectasis caused by choledocholith were collected. All specimens were offered by department of hepatobiliarypediatric surgery. The apoptosis related index (bcl2 and bax) and cell proliferation index (PCNA) were detected by the immunohistochemical technique; Apoptosis was detected by TUNEL method. ResultsThere was serious mucosal epithelial cell damage in cystic dilatation group. In cylindrical dilatation group there was a damage similar to that of the cystis dilatation group, but the damage was not serious. In control group there was little damage in the duct wall, but there was a low positive rate of apoptosis of 〔epithelium cell (2.74±1.00)% and fibroblast (2.95±0.87）%〕, and a low bcl2 and bax’s expression rate, and a high PCNA’s expression rate 〔epithelium cell (3.74±1.00)%, fibroblast (3.71±1.77)%〕. There was no obvious difference between cylindrical dilatation group and cystic dilatation group (Pgt;0.05): the PCNA’s expression rate was low 〔(0.99±0.51)% and (0.90±0.38)% respectively〕, the bax expression rate was high in remaining epithelial cell, and the positive rate of bax was apparently higher than that of bcl2 (P＜0.05), the positive rate of the apoptosis cell was high 〔(13.94±4.77)%, (7.51±3.46)%〕; the expression rate PCNA were high 〔(9.91±2.91)%,(9.70±3.18)%〕, and expression rate of bax’s was low in the fibre tissue, the positive rate of bcl2 was markedly higher than that of bax, and the positive rate of the apoptosis cell was low 〔(3.74±2.12)%,(4.46±2.41)%〕. There were no marked difference between the two groups (Pgt;0.05). The expression of bcl2 and bax had marked difference both in cylindrical dilatation group and cystic dilatation group and as compared to control group (P＜0.05). ConclusionApoptosis has certain promoting effect in the course of choledochal cyst formation.
Objective To investigate the diagnosis and treatment of congenital choledochal cysts(CCC) in children. MethodsThe manifestation, auxiliary examination, mode of operation and effect of 42 patients with CCC in children from Jan., 1980 to June, 1999 were analyzed retrospectively.Results The patients with the triad of jaundice, an abdominal mass, and pain was 38.1% among the 42 patients. B-ultrasonic diagnosis was made with a correct diagnostic rate of 95.2%. The effective rate of internal drainage was significantly lower than that of resection of the cyst(χ2=19.36, P＜0.001) while the reoperation rate and incidence of carcinoma of internal drainage were higher than those of resection of the cyst(χ2=11.59, P＜0.001 and χ2=4.97, P＜0.05). Conclusion B-ultrasonic diagnosis is recommended as the first examination method. Internal drainage should be abandoned. Resection of the cyst with Roux-Y hepaticojejunostomy is recommended as the treatment of choice on extrahepatic cholangiectasis. Liver transplantation is a reasonable choice to treat the diffuse intrahepatic cholangiectasis.
To study the changes in diagnosis and treatment of pediatric choledochal cyst in the past 10 years, a retrospective analysis was made in 79 children with choledochal cyst, who were admitted into our hospital from 1982 to 1998. Results show that in the past years, the clinical manifestation of choledochal cyst in children have become less obvious for earlier consultation. B-mode ultrasounscanning should be the first choice since it aids in the diagnosis of choledochal cyst as well as its related and complicated diseases. Choledochectomy is the only radical treatment for choledochal cyst in children.
Object To evaluate the significance of double common bile duct （DCBD） in hepatobiliary surgery. Metheds The data of diagnosis and treatment of two patients with DCBD in our hospital between Jul. to Dec. 2010 were analyzed retrospective， and the related literatures were reviewed. Results The right hepatic bile duct of DCBD due to mistaking it for cystic duct in 1 case was accidental injuried during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Another example，the DCBD was confirmed by intraoperative exploration and choledochoscopic examination， at the same time with chole-dochal cyst， anomalous pancreaticobiliary ductal junction （APBDJ）， primary hepatolithus， and choledocholith， and then operation was performed. Two cases were typeⅤb of DCBD. A total of 32 English literatures were reviewed. Since the beginning of 1932 English literature had reported 100 cases of DCBD. The type Ⅱand typeⅢwere the most common type of DCBD， and the typeⅤonly 10 cases. There were 27 cases of DCBD in twenty-five Chinese articles from 1994 to 2012. The typeⅤwas the most common type of DCBD. The accessory common bile duct （ACBD） opening in the duod-enum， gastric， and pancreatic duct were the most common. The common complications included stone， APBDJ， choled-ochal cyst， tumor etc. Conclusions DCBD is a very rare anatomic variation of extrahepatic bile duct， often accompanied by calculus of bile duct and common bile duct cyst， APBDJ， and other biliary anatomy abnormality， and potentially carci-nogenic potential. The existence of DCBD may increase the risk of iatrogenic bile duct injury and complexity of biliary operation. In view of this， this abnormality of extrahepatic duct should be paid with close attention during operation.