Objective To evaluate the prel iminary cl inical outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) for patient with discogenic chronic low back pain (CLBP) and fail ing to respond to conservative treatment. Methods From June 2007 to May 2008, 52 patients with CLBP and fail ing to respond to conservative treatment were treated, including 15 males and 37 females aged 29-46 years old (average 38.2 years old). Those patients were diagnosed ith discogenic pain by low pressure discography. Duration of CLBP was 6-110 months with an average of 32.1 months. MRI exam revealed 108 “black intervertebral discs” low in signal on T2 image, including 3 discs of L2,3, 17 of L3,4, 48 of L4,5 and 40 of L5-S1. Pressure-controlled discography showed positive response, fluoroscopy or intraoperative CT confirmed annulus fibrosus tears of posterior intervertebral disc in 79 discs. PELD was performed. Visual analogue scale (VAS) was evaluated before operation, 1 month after operation and at the final follow-up. The cl inical outcome was determined by modified Macnab criteria at the final follow-up. Results The average operation time of each disc was 30.7 minutes (range 21-36 minutes), and the mean length of postoperative hospital stay was 3.7 days (range 2-5 days). No compl ications such as infection and the injury of blood vessels and nerves occurred. Transient paralysis of nerve occurred in 5 cases on operation day, and those symptoms were disappeared at the final follow-up visit without special treatment. Fifty-two cases were followed up for 3-15 months (average 7.3 months). VAS score before operation, 1 month after operation and at the final follow-up was (7.34 ± 1.52), (3.62 ± 0.92) and (1.57 ± 0.48) points, respectively, indicating there were significant differences compared with preoperative score (P lt; 0.01). According to the modified Macnab criteria, 11 cases were graded as excellent, 23 as good, 13 as fair, 5 as bad, and the excellent and good rate was 65.38%. Conclusion Prel iminary study suggests that PELD is safe and effective in treating patient with discogenic CLBP and fail ing to respond to conservative treatment.
ObjectiveTo review the present clinical evaluation of treatment for chronic low back pain. MethodsThe literature on the effectiveness evaluation method of chronic low back pain was reviewed and summarized. ResultsMany scoring systems are used to assess the treatment for chronic low back pain through the evaluation of pain and functional disability. The function evaluations are divided into general and disease-specific evaluations. Currently the most widely used evaluation systems are as follows: short-form 36 health survey scale (SF-36), Oswestry disability index (ODI), Roland-Morris disability questionnaire (RDQ), Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) low back pain scoring system, Quebec back pain disability scale (QBPDS), and Macnab criteria. Visual analogue scale (VAS) and numerical rating scale (NRS) are usually used to evaluate the pain degree. ConclusionThere are many effectiveness evaluation methods of chronic low back pain, but there is still a lack of more comprehensive, concise, and practical evaluation method. Further studies are required to develop it.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy of exercise therapy for patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) by network meta-analysis (NMA).MethodsThe PubMed, EBSCO, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP and CBM databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCT) on exercise for patients with CLBP from inception to May, 2020. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed risk of bias of included studies. Then, NMA was performed by Stata 15.1 software.ResultsA total of 79 RCTs involving 5 782 CLBP patients were included. The effect of exercise therapy on pain in patients with CLBP were in the following rankings: yoga (SMD=−1.25, 95%CI −1.87 to −0.64, P<0.000 1), health Qigong/Taichi (SMD=−1.12, 95%CI −1.87 to −0.64, P=0.002), sling exercise (SMD=−1.07, 95%CI −1.64 to −0.50, P<0.000 1), Mackenzie therapy (SMD=−1.05, 95%CI −1.68 to −0.42, P=0.001), pilates (SMD=−0.96, 95%CI −1.74 to −1.78, P=0.016), multimodal training (SMD=−0.80, 95%CI −1.33 to −0.27, P=0.003) and stabilisation/motor control (SMD=−0.62, 95%CI −1.03 to −0.21, P=0.003). The effect of exercise therapy on function in patients with CLBP were in the following rankings: Mackenzie therapy (SMD=−0.62, 95%CI −1.03 to −0.21, P=0.003), and yoga (SMD=−0.88, 95%CI −1.51 to −0.25, P=0.007). Clusterank results showed that Mackenzie therapy, yoga, pilates, sling exercise and multimodal training were similar in improving pain and physical function in patients with CLBP.ConclusionsThe current study shows that yoga, Mackenzie therapy, pilates, sling exercise and multimodal training constitute the optimal group for improving CLBP symptoms. Health Qigong/Taichi is second only to yoga in improving pain in patients with CLBP, which has great promotional value.