Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of nedaplatin combined with chemotherapy versus cisplatin combined with chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on nedaplatin combined with chemotherapy versus cisplatin combined with chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC were searched in The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMbase, CBM, VIP and WanFang Data from the date of their establishment to January 2012. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, two reviewers independently screened the studies, extracted the data and assessed the quality. Then RevMan 5.0 software was used for meta-analysis. Results A total of 15 RCTs involving 1 076 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that, compared with the cisplatin combined with chemotherapy, nedaplatin combined with chemotherapy could reduce the risks of nausea and vomiting (RR=0.56, 95%CI 0.48 to 0.65, Plt;0.000 01), decrease the risk of renal function impairment (RR=0.47, 95%CI 0.30 to 0.74, P=0.001), but increase the risk of thrombocytopenia (RR=1.59, 95%CI 1.20 to 2.11, P=0.001). There were no significant differences between the two groups in objective response rate (ORR) (RR=1.09, 95%CI 0.92 to 1.29, P=0.03), leukopenia (RR=1.05, 95%CI 0.92 to 1.19, P=0.50), and hemoglobin reduction (RR=0.92, 95%CI 0.80 to 1.07, P=0.30). Conclusion Compared with cisplatin combined with chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC patients, nedaplatin in combination with chemotherapy can significantly reduce the risks of nausea, vomiting and renal function impairment. Although the ORRs are similar in the two groups, nedaplatin combined with chemotherapy can cause a higher risk of thrombocytopenia. For the quality restriction and possible publication bias of the included studies, more high quality RCTs are required to further verify this conclusion.
Objective To systematically evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of raltitrexed plus cisplatin in the treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) when compared with other chemotherapy regimens. Methods We electronically searched PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library and Chinese Biomedicine Database to March, 2007. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs were identified, and Revman 4.2.10 was applied for statistical analyses. Results One RCT involving 250 patients was included, which compared raltitrexed plus cisplatin versus cisplatin alone in the treatment of MPM. In the intention-to-treat population, the median survival time was statistically longer in the raltitrexed plus cisplatin group as compared to cisplatin alone group. (11.4 versus 8.8 months, P=0.048). The incidence of grade 3/4 toxicities was similar between the two groups. Conclusion The current evidence available showed that, the combination of raltitrexed and cisplatin may prolong the survival time for MPM patients, with a low incidence of grade 3/4 toxicities. However, more high-quality RCTs are required to further define its clinical effectiveness.
Objective To observe the effect of cisplatin in bletilla hyacinthine particle chemotherapy combined with 125I brachytherapy on short-and long-term outcomes and the toxic and side effects in advanced gastric cancer. Methods One hundred seventy-six patients with stage Ⅱ or stage Ⅲ advanced gastric cancer underwent curative surgical resection were included in this study. They were randomly divided into brachytherapy and chemotherapy group (n=48), intraperitoneal chemotherapy group (n=32) and intravenous chemotherapy group (n=48), and other patients who abandoned radiotherapy and chemotherapy and signed informed consent form by themselves were considered as control group (n=48). The short-and long-term outcomes and the toxic and side effects were observed and the survival of all patients was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method and Log-Rank test. Results For short-term outcomes, the total effective rate in 4 groups were 95.83%, 71.88%, 64.58% and 52.08% respectively, and the difference was significant (Plt;0.05). For long-term outcomes, the 3 -and 5-year mortality rate was 37.50% and 56.30%, and 5-year median survival time was (14±4.51) months (95%CI: 14.419-4.512) in brachytherapy and chemotherapy group patients. The 3- and 5-year mortality rate was 78.12%and 93.75%and 5year median survival time was (10.6±1.13) months (95%CI: 10.620-1.163) in intraperitoneal chemotherapy group patients. The 3-and 5-year mortality rate was 79.21%and 95.80%and 5-year median survival time was (11±3.10) months (95%CI: 11.130-3.162) in intravenous chemotherapy group patients. The 3-and 5-year mortality rate was 87.50%and 95.83% and 5-year median survival time was (9±2.30) months (95%CI: 10.024-1.180) in control group patients. Compared with the vein chemotherapy group, the short distance puts the chemotherapy group disgusting vomit, the marrow to suppress, the liver function harm, the kidney function harm formation rate to reduce obviously (Plt;0.05). Conclusion Cisplatin in bletilla hyacinthine particle chemotherapy combined with 125I brachytherapy can reduce the toxic and side effects of drugs and prolong survival time of patients with advanced gastric cancer.
Objective Non-small cell lung cancer ( NSCLC) cells are relatively resistant to chemotherapy, and the outcomes are not always satisfactory. This study was designed to explore the relationship between the content of Ku80 protein of human lung cancer cells and their sensitivity to cisplatin.Methods The lung cancer cells isolated frommalignant pleural effusion samples frompatients with primary lung cancer were cultured in vitro. The sensitivity to cisplatin was tested with the method of CCK-8 expressed as half maximal inhibitory concentration ( IC50 ) . The relative content of Ku80 protein was determined by Western blot. The correlation between sensitivity to cisplatin of lung cancer cells and the relative content of Ku80 protein was analyzed. Results The IC50 of NSCLC group was significantly higher than that of SCLCgroup [ ( 4. 40 ±3. 39) mg/L vs. ( 1. 02 ±0. 54) mg/L, P lt; 0. 001] . The relative content of Ku80 protein of NSCLC group was statistically higher than that of SCLC group [ ( 0. 80 ±0. 45) vs. ( 0. 48 ±0. 25) , P lt;0. 05] . The correlation coefficient between content of Ku80 protein and IC50 was 0. 618 ( P lt; 0. 001) .Conclusions The content of Ku80 protein of NSCLC patients is higher than that of SCLC patients. Itmay be one of the mechanisms contributing to chemotherapeutic resistance of NSCLC. There is a negative relationship between Ku80 protein content of cancer cells and their sensitivity to cisplatin suggesting that the content of Ku80 protein may be served as a candidate index for predicting sensitivity of lung cancer cells to cisplatin.
Objective To observe the influence of cisplan on the expression of B7-H1 in retinoblastoma (RB) cells，and to investigate its mechanism. Methods Human RB cell line HXO-Rb44 cells were treated by 6 different concentrations of cisplan (0.000, 0.375, 0.750, 1.500, 3.000, 6.000 mu;g/ml), and their B7-H1 mRNA expression was determined by the reversetranscription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and fluorescence quantitative PCR (FQ-PCR); the B7-H1 protein expression was determined by immunofluorescence and flow cytometry. HXO-Rb44 cells were treated by 1.5 mu;g/ml cisplan for 0, 15, 30, 60, 120 min, then the phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) was detected by Western blot.Results The expression of B7-H1 mRNA and protein in the 0.375, 0.750, 1.500, 3.000, 6.000 mu;g/ml group were significantly higher than that of the blank control group (F=395.478，112.03; P=0.000）. Western blot showed that cisplan (1.5 mu;g/ml) could activate ERK1/2 by increasing its phosphorylation in HXO-Rb44 cells. After cisplan treatment, the phosphorylation of ERK1/2 increased gradually and reached its peak at 30 min, and then went down gradually.Conclusion Cisplan can promote the expression of B7-H1 and activate ERK1/2 in RB cells.
ObjectiveTo compare the recent efficiency and toxicity reactions of pemetrexed plus cisplatin and paclitaxel plus cisplatin for advanced lung adenocarcinoma. MethodsOne hundred and twenty-four patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma treated in our hospital between January 2009 and December 2012 were divided into pemetrexed plus cisplatin group (group PP, n=63) and paclitaxel plus cisplatin group (group TP, n=61). The effect was evaluated after two courses of treatment, and the toxicity reactions were evaluated every course. ResultsThe objective response rate, disease control rate and progression-free survival in group PP and TP were respectively 58.7% vs 37.7%, 74.6% vs 52.5%, and 6.1 months vs 4.5 months, with significant differences (P<0.05). The incidence of nausea and vomiting, and white blood cell decrease (neutropenia) in group PP were significantly lower than that in group TP (χ2=16.164, P<0.001; χ2=9.469, P=0.002). There were no significant differences in incidence of thrombocytopenia, anemia and hepatic function damage (χ2=0.098, P=0.755; χ2=0.267, P=0.606; χ2=0.006, P=0.973). ConclusionPemetrexed plus cisplatin shows obviously superior effects and fewer side effects on advanced lung adenocarcinoma compared with paclitaxel plus cisplatin regime.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine, paclitaxel plus cisplatin (GTP) chemotherapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma in China. MethodsTen patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma who underwent GTP chemotherapy regimens were collected from February to July 2014 in our hospital. According to solid tumor curative effect evaluation standard 1.1, we evaluated the clinical effcacy and collected the adverse reactions. ResultsTen patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma accepted first-line chemotherapy using GTP chemotherapy regimens. There was 1 case of complete remission, 4 cases of partial response, 3 stable cases, and 2 progressive cases. Adverse reactions of degree Ⅲ were mainly of hematology toxicity, including 5 cases of leukocytes and neutrophils reduction, and 1 case of anemia. The remaining adverse reactions included gastrointestinal reaction, hair loss, and abnormal renal function. ConclusionGTP chemotherapy regimen is a promising treatment for advanced urothelial carcinoma.
ObjectiveTo investigate MUC1 over-expression on chemotherapy of 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin for esophageal cancer cells. MethodsMUC1 over-expression and stable silencing of MUC1 expression esophageal cancer cell lines were constructed. Xenograft model of esophageal cancer was established in nude mice. Cisplatin (8 mg/kg, day 1 and day 7)and 5-fluorouracil (20 mg/kg, day 1 to 6)were injected intraperitoneally. Tumor volume and body weight of nude mice were measured. Tumor growth curve and body weight curve were drawn, and tumor inhibitory rate was calculated. ResultsBoth cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil suppressed tumor growth of MUC1 over-expression esophageal cancer nude mice. Body weight and tumor volume of nude mice of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil groups were significantly smaller than those of the control group (P < 0.05), and the inhibitory effects of cisplatin were significantly greater than those of 5-fluorouracil (P < 0.05). There was no significant inhibitory effect in stable silencing of MUC1 expression esophageal cancer nude mice. ConclusionBoth cisplatin and paclitaxel can suppress the growth of MUC1 over-expression esophageal cancer, and cisplatin has greater inhibitory effects than 5-fluorouracil in tumor volume and body weight of nude mice.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the effectiveness and safety of taxanes combined with cisplatin and fluorouracil (TFP) versus cisplatin and fluorouracil (FP) for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. MethodsDatabases such as The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2013), PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, CBM, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about taxanes combined with cisplatin and fluorouracil in the treatment of locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma from the date of their establishment to April 1st, 2013. Two reviewers independently screened studies according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data and evaluated the methodological quality of included studies. Then meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.2 software. ResultsA total of 7 RCTs involving 2 088 patients were included. The TFP group included 1 051 cases, while the FP group included 1 037 cases. The results of meta-analyses showed that, there were significant differences between the two groups in the 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year overall survival rates (RR=1.12, 95%CI 1.02 to 1.23, P=0.02; RR=1.20, 95%CI 1.11 to 1.29, P < 0.000 01; RR=1.18, 95%CI 1.07 to 1.31, P=0.000 7), the 1-year, 2-year, and 3 year of progressions free survival (RR=1.18, 95%CI 1.08 to 1.28, P=0.000 2; RR=1.20, 95%CI 1.06 to 1.36, P=0.003; RR=1.48, 95%CI 1.25 to 1.74, P < 0.000 01), the complete remission rate (RR=1.67, 95%CI 1.26 to 2.23, P=0.000 4), and the overall response to chemotherapy (RR=1.18, 95%CI 1.11 to 1.27, P < 0.000 01). As for the side effect, the FP group was superior to the TFP group in the neutropenia (RR=1.42, 95%CI 1.24 to 1.63, P < 0.000 01), alopecia (RR=16.09, 95%CI 4.59 to 56.38, P < 0.000 1), and febrile neutropenia (RR=2.21, 95%CI 1.29 to 3.80, P < 0.004). ConclusionThe fluorouracil with cisplatin and fluorouracil for advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma might have better effects, but with higher side effects.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of cisplatin combined with etoposide versus other platinum combined with etoposide in the treatment of small cell lung cancer (SCLC). MethodsWe searched PubMed, The Cochrane Library (Issue 8, 2013), MEDLINE (Ovid), CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) concerning the efficacy and safety of cisplatin combined with etoposide (the cisplatin group) versus other platinum combined with etoposide (the control group) for SCLC. The search was up to August 2013. Two reviewers screened literatures according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data and assessed the methodological quality of included studies. And then, meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.2 software. ResultsA total of 6 RCTs involving 684 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that there were no significant differences in disease control rate (DCR) (RR=1.03, 95%CI 0.91 to 1.17, P=0.63), overall response rate (ORR) (RR=1.04, 95%CI 0.97 to 1.11, P=0.33), occurrence of leukocytopenia (RR=0.97, 95%CI 0.81 to 1.17, P=0.77), decreased hemoglobin (RR=0.89, 95%CI 0.61 to 1.31, P=0.56) between the cisplatin group and the control group. Occurrence of thrombocytopenia was lower (RR=0.49, 95%CI 0.38 to 0.63, P<0.000 01) while occurrence of nausea and vomiting was higher (RR=1.80, 95%CI 1.40 to 2.31, P<0.000 01) in the cisplatin group. ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that the clinical efficacy of cisplatin combined with etoposide for SCLC is equal to other platinum combined with etoposide, but it has a certain advantage in decreasing the aggregative rate of platelets, while the gastrointesnial reaction patients should avoid using cisplatin combined with etoposide.