ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical significance of abnormal confluence of common bile duct (CBD) and pancreatic duct. MethodsFortyfive cases of biliary pancreatic confluence portion of cadavers were dissected and observed with microscope. ResultsThe lower end of CBD inserted normally into the medial posterior portion of descending duodenum with oblique angle (41.4±5.3)° and safeguarded by the sidelong wrinkle formed by mucous membrane of duodenum. In common, pancreatic duct ampulla inserted into CBD with oblique angle (28.5±7.9)° and jointed CBD in the medial wall of dudenum. The length ampulla of Vater was about 0.5-1.5 cm. The Vater’s ampulla was dilated obviously. ConclusionThe result indicates that pancreatic duct and CBD joint with a sharp angle. A number of abnormal anatomic factors may change the relation of oblique angle, and lead to the pancreatitis.
Objective To study the effect of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration via choledochotomy and T tube drainage. Metheods Laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct with choledochoscopy via choledochotomy was performed in 105 patients, T tube was placed in all patients with laparoscopic suturing technique.Results Except negative exploration in 2 cases, duct clearance was achieved in 99 per cent (102/103) of patients. Conclusion Laparoscopic exploratoin of common bile duct via choledochotomy and T tube drainage is one of the safe and effective management options for common bile duct calculi.
Histological studies and morphometry quantitative analysis have been performed on trial rabbit’s dilated common bile duct(CBD),which does not dilate simultaneously.The results shows:①Epithelia of rabbit’s CBD have a ber reparable function,which is fairly significant to the prevention of bile duct’s further injure under the pathogenic situation.②The smooth muscle cell(SMC)of the CBD is the histological basis of contraction,some SMC can be seen in contracting state under light microscope.This indicates that the SMC in rabbit’s CBD possess contracting function.③The collagenous and elastic fibers have the normal histological morphometric characteristics and quantity in it’s dilatation process,and no breekdown and degeneration of the fibers can be detected.Because of the morphological structure of these sections is quite similiar with normal ones,theoretically,we suspect that when pathological change of bile duct’s distal portion is relieved and the bile pressure is normal again.It is possible for this dilating bile duct to return to its formal shape and size.
Objective To assess the benefits and harms of routine primary suture (LBEPS) versus T-tube drainage (LCHTD) following laparoscopic common bile duct stone exploration. Methods The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs were electronically searched from the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2010), PubMed (1978 to 2010), EMbase (1966 to 2010), CBMdisc (1978 to 2010), and CNKI (1979 to 2010); and the relevant published and unpublished data and their references were also searched by hand. The data were extracted and the quality was evaluated by two reviewers independently, and the RevMan 5.0 software was used for data analysis. Results Four studies including 3 RCTs and 1 quasi-RCT involving 274 patients were included. The meta-analysis showed that compared with LCHTD, LBEPS was better in shortening operation time (WMD= –17.11, 95%CI –25.86 to –8.36), abdominal drainage time (WMD= –0.74, 95%CI –1.39 to –0.10) and post-operative hospitalization time (WMD= –3.30, 95%CI –3.67 to –2.92), in lowering hospital expenses (WMD= –2 998.75, 95%CI –4 396.24 to –1 601.26) and in reducing the complications due to T-tube such as tube detaching, bile leakage after tube drawing, and choleperitonitis (RR=0.56, 95%CI 0.29 to 1.09). Conclusion LBEPS is superior to LCHTD in total effectiveness for common bile duct stone with the precondition of strictly abiding by operation indication. Due to the low quality of the included studies which decreases the reliability of this conclusion, more reasonably-designed and strictly-performed multi-centered RCTs with large scale and longer follow up time are required to further assess and verify the efficacy and safety of this treatment.
Objective To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of ERCP/S+LC and LC+LCBDE in cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis. Methods A fully recursive literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMbase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials in any language. By using a defined search strategy, both the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials on comparing ERCP/ S+LC with LC+LCBDE in cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis were identified. Data were extracted and evaluated by two reviewers independently. The quality of the included trials was evaluated. Meta-analyses were conducted using the Cochrane Collaboration’s RevMan 5.0.2 software. Results Fourteen controlled clinical trials (1 544 patients) were included. The results of meta-analyses showed that: a) There were no significant difference in the stone clearance rate between the two groups (RR=0.96, 95%CI 0.92 to 1.01, P=0.14); b) There were no significant difference in the residual stone rate between the two groups (OR=1.05, 95%CI 0.65 to 1.72, P=0.83); c) There were no significant difference in the complications morbidity between the two groups (OR=1.12, 95%CI 0.85 to 1.55, P=0.48); d) There were no significant difference in the mortality during follow-up visit between the two groups (RD= 0.00, 95%CI –0.03 to 0.03, P=0.84); e) The length of hospital stay in the LC+LCBDE group was shorter than that of the ERCP/S+LC group with significant difference (WMD= 1.78, 95%CI 0.94 to 2.62, Plt;0.000 1); and f) The LC+LCBDE group was superior to the ERCP/S+LC group in the aspects of procedure time and total hospital charges. Conclusion Although there aren’t differences in the effectiveness and safety between the ERCP/S+LC group and the LC+LCBDE group, the latter is superior to the former in procedure time, length of hospital stay and total hospital charges. For the influencing factors of lower quality and astable statistical outcomes of the included studies, this conclusion has to be verified with more strictly designed large scale RCTs.
Objective To investigate the feasibility and patient selection of T-tube free laparoscopic common bileduct exploration through mini-incision in confluence of common bile duct （CBD） and cystic duct. Methods The clinical data of 52 patients who underwent CBD exploration from January 2009 to December 2011 were retrospectively analyzed. A 3-4mm longitudinal incision of anterior wall of CBD was made along the confluence of CBD and cystic duct， and then the choledochoscope was inserted into CBD through this mini-incision for the exploration and treatment by laparoscopy and choledochoscopy， the incision was sewed up by T-tube free primary suture. Results All 52 cases were cured and stone clearance rate was 100% as revealed by choledochoscopy and cholangiography. The time of operation， intraoperativecholangiography， removal of stones with help of choledochoscope， and removal drainage tube after operation was from 90 to 200 min with an average of 100min， 3 to 10min with an average of 6min， 5 to 15 min with an average of 8 min，and 3-5d with an average of 3.5d ， respectively. The drainage flow was 20-60mL/d with an average of 30mL/d. No biliary leakage， abdominal pain， and choloplania or infection of incision was observed following operation. The hospital stay was 5 to 12d with an average of 6.5d after operation. No calculus regeneration or bile duct stricture occurred during following-up of 3 to 40 months with an average of 20 months. Conclusion With proper patient selection， T-tube free laparoscopic CBD exploration through mini-incision in confluence of CBD and cystic duct is safe and feasible by proficient surgeons in laparoscopy and choledochoscopy.
ObjectiveTo explore how to select the suitable indications of ERCP for clinical diagnosis and treatment. MethodsThe data of patients treated by ERCP between January 2005 and December 2009 in our hospital were analyzed retrospectively. ResultsTotal 221 patients received ERCP, among whom 99 (45%) cases of common bile duct stones, 44 (20%) cases of malignant tumor, 9 (4%) cases of papilla narrow, 45 (20%) cases were negative, and 24 (11%) cases were failed. It had the trend that the number of the patients received ERCP reduced year by year. The postoperative complication rate was 11% (25 cases), including 15 cases of postoperative pancreatitis, 3 cases of bleeding, 5 cases of biliary duct infection, and 2 cases of basket stranded. ConclusionIn the modern medical condition, with the advancement of image and laparoscopy technology, we should select the diagnosis and treatment methods with the principles of no damage or less damage for patients, without unlimitedly broadening the clinical indications of ERCP.
ObjectiveTo summarize the clinical experience on primary suture after common bile duct exploration and to investigate its clinical indications and curative effects. MethodsThe clinical data of 137 patients underwent primary closure of common bile duct between February 2006 and June 2010 were analyzed retrospectively. ResultsAll operations were successful. The operative time ranged from 65-213 min (mean 129 min) and the blood loss ranged from 50-350 ml with an average of 148 ml. One hundred and twenty-four patients (90.5%) were discharged from hospital without complications within 7 d after operation. Postoperative bile leakage occurred in 13 patients (9.5%) consisted of 10 early stage cases (18.5%, 10/54) and 3 later stage cases (3.6%, 3/83), which were discharged with improvement by conservative treatment within 3 weeks after operation. Totally 113 patients (82.5%) were followed up for 2-54 months with a median time of 14 months, no residual or retained stone and biliary duct stricture occurred. ConclusionOnly with the strict indication and proficient surgical technology, primary suture after common bile duct exploration is a safe and effective way to choledocholithiasis.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) on prevention of the complications in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). MethodsThe clinical data of 1 079 patients underwent LC from January 2006 to June 2010 in this hospital were retrospectively analyzed. According to the use of MRCP or not in the different period, the patients were divided into nonMRCP group (n=523) and MRCP group (n=556). The occurrence of bile duct injuries (BDI) and retained common duct stone (RCDS) were compared between two groups. ResultsConversion to open surgery was performed in 35 cases in nonMRCP group and in 41 cases in MRCP group. The intraoperative and postoperative BDI were found in five patients and RCDS were found in 27 patients in nonMRCP group, and those were not found in patients in MRCP group. The differences of BDI and RCDS of patients were significant between two groups (P=0.026 and P=0.000). In nonMRCP group, 23 of 55 patients were found common bile duct stones by intraoperative cholangiography. Common bile duct stones were found by intraoperative cholangiography other than preoperative MRCP in three patients in MRCP group, while another three patients did not find common bile duct stones by intraoperative cholangiography although preoperative MRCP suggested. By MRCP, double gallbladders were found in one patient, Mirizzi syndrome in eight patients, variant cystic duct in 34 patients, accessory hepatic duct in 28 patients, and complicating common bile duct stones in 27 patients in MRCP group, the diagnostic accuracy of those were 100%, 87.5%, 94.1%, 89.3% and 88.9%, respectively. ConclusionPreoperative MRCP is helpful to prevent BDI and RCDS for the patients with LC.
Objective To prevent bile duct injury, a new anatomy marker, named “common bile duct window” is created. Methods From November 2005 to March 2006, 60 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy were researched in this hospital. All data were collected, including: age, gender, course of disease, body mass index (BMI), blood lipid level (triglyceride and cholesterol), the thickness of gallbladder wall and the degree of cholecystitis. The frequency, location and mean size of “common bile duct window” were recorded and calculated. Patients were divided into two groups according to the presence of “common bile duct window”, and the diference of data between two groups was analyzed by using χ2 test or t test. Results “Common bile duct window” was found at the end of hepatoduoduenal ligament with oval-shaped, the mean longitude of “common bile duct window” was (1.20±0.60) cm, and mean width was (0.45±0.30) cm. “Common bile duct window” were found in 81.6% (49/60) of patients. Age, gender, course of disease, BMI, triglyceride and cholesterol were proved to have no relationship with the presence of “common bile duct window” （Pgt;0.05）, but the thickness of gallbladder wall and the degree of cholecystitis affected the presence （P＜0.05）. Conclusion An oval-shaped “common bile duct window” can be found in almost all patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. During the operation, the common bile duct can be located easily by the surgeon through “common bile duct window”, thereby to avoid common bile duct injury when the cyst duct was dissected. It is believed that during laparoscopic cholecystectomy the chances of bile duct injuries can be effectively decreased by the presence of “common bile duct window”.