Objective To evaluate the radiographic and postoperative function of computer navigation versus traditional methods for total knee arthroplasty through meta-analysis. Methods we searched the specialized trials registered in Cochrane muscle group, The Cochrane Library (CCTR), MEDLINE (1966 to 2009), EMbase (1980 to 2009), PubMed (1966 to 2009), NRR (http://www.update-software.com/National/), CCT (http://www.controlled-trials.com), and CBMdisc (1979 to July 2009), and we manually searched some Chinese orthoopaedics journals. Data were extracted and evaluated by two reviewers independently. Randomized controlled trials of computer navigation and traditional methods for total knee arthroplasty were included. The quality of the included trials was critically assessed. RevMan 4.2.8 software was used for data analysis. Results Eighteen RCTs of computer navigation and traditional methods for total knee arthroplasty were included. A total of 2 349 patients met the inclusion criteria for the review. The results showed that, computer navigation versus traditional methods for the total knee arthroplasty: a) about radiography: there was difference in the precise measurement of lower limbs mechanical axis (WMD= – 0.56, 95%CI – 0.74 to – 0.38, Plt;0.00001), but no obvious difference in measurement of the femoral frontal axis (WMD= – 0.29, 95%CI – 0.58 to 0.00, P=0.05), sagittal axis (WMD= – 1.64, 95%CI – 3.49 to 0.21, P=0.08) and angle of rotation (WMD= – 0.11, 95%CI – 0.87 to 0.66, P=0.79). Obvious difference was not found in the tibial frontal axis (WMD= – 0.31, 95%CI – 0.69 to 0.06, P=0.10), but found in the tibial sagittal axis (WMD= – 0.69, 95%CI – 1.10 to – 0.28, P=0.001). No difference was found in the tibiafemoral angle (WMD= 0.03, 95%CI – 0.78 to 0.84, P=0.95), patella tilt angle (WMD= – 1.45, 95%CI – 3.12 to 0.22, P=0.09) and patella angle of rotation (WMD= – 0.34, 95%CI – 0.71 to 0.02, P=0.06); b) there was obvious difference in operating time (WMD= 13.31, 95%CI 10.00 to 16.63, Plt;0.000 01), but no obvious difference in the complications (RR= 1.65, 95%CI 0.87 to 3.13, P=0.13) and the hemorrhage volume (WMD= – 74.81, 95%CI – 184.71 to 35.09, P=0.18); and c) about the evaluation of postoperative function: the follow-up in all studies was more than 6 months; there was no obvious difference in joint motion (WMD= – 2.17, 95%CI – 5.66 to 1.33, P=0.22), KSS scores (WMD= 6.28, 95%CI – 3.69 to 16.25, P=0.22), and OXFORD scores (WMD= – 0.31, 95%CI – 2.05 to 1.43, P=0.72). Conclusions Compared with traditional methods, computer navigation using for the total knee arthroplasty: a) is much accurate in measurement of the lower limbs mechanical axis and tibial sagittal axis, but is not superior in measurement of the femoral frontal axis, femoral sagittal axis, femoral angle of rotation, tibial frontal axis, tibiafemoral angle, patella tilt angle, and patella angle of rotation; b) may spend a longer operating time if not performed by proficient for it is a kind of new technique realm, but is similar in decreasing complications and hemorrhage volume; and c) is not obvious different in function evaluation after over 6 months follow-up which has to be further studied.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the value of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with computer navigation by comparing with conventional TKA. MethodsBetween May 2010 and December 2011, 45 patients underwent primary unilateral TKA, and the clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. Of 45 patients, 22 cases were treated with TKA with computer navigation (group A), 23 cases with the conventional TKA (group B). There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index, side, cause of disease, disease duration, preoperative range of motion (ROM) of the knee, and preoperative Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score between 2 groups (P > 0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, incidence of patellar retinacular release, complication, and drainage volume were compared. The prosthesis loosening, postoperative HSS score, and ROM of the knee were also compared. ResultsNo difference was found in the incidence of patellar retinacular release during TKA, and it was 13.6% (3/22) in group A and was 4.3% (1/23) in group B, showing no significant difference (χ2=1.198, P=0.346). The operation time of group A was significantly longer than that of group B (t=7.557, P=0.000). There was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss during TKA between 2 groups (t=-0.295, P=0.769), while the drainage volume of group A was significantly less than that of group B (t=-2.419, P=0.020). Incomplete fracture during TKA and acute infection occurred at 8 days after TKA in 1 case of group A respectively, while no fracture or infection was found in group B, showing significant difference (Z=-0.509, P=0.000). The patients of 2 groups were followed up 27-46 months. No significant difference in valgus and varus of knee, and malalignment of the femoral and tibial prosthesis was found (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in HSS score and ROM of the knee at last follow-up between 2 groups (P > 0.05). No prosthesis loosening was found in 2 groups. ConclusionTKA with computer navigation has similar results to conventional TKA in the mechanical alignment, but it obviously prolongs operation time. It may also increase the incidence of infection and tractor pin related fracture.
ObjectiveTo investigate the short-term effectiveness of novel computer navigation system (Knee 3 software; Brainlab, Germany) assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA).MethodsBetween July 2020 and December 2020, 19 patients underwent unilateral TKA assisted with Knee 3 software. There were 4 males and 15 females. The mean age was 66.3 years (range, 52-79 years). Eighteen patients were diagnosed with osteoarthritis and 1 patient with rheumatoid arthritis. Sixteen patients had varus knees and 3 patients had valgus knees. Preoperative Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain, stiffness, function, and total scores were 12.4±3.4, 2 (1, 4), 22 (18, 29), and 37 (29, 43), respectively. Intraoperatively, the medial and lateral gaps in knee extension and in 90° of knee flexion were recorded. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, blood transfusion, and complications were recorded. The hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), lateral distal femoral angle, and medial proximal tibial angle were measured to evaluate lower limb alignment and prostheses’s alignment using X-ray films at 6 weeks after operation. Patient’s satisfaction rate and WOMAC pain, stiffness, function, and total scores were investigated.ResultsEighteen patients (94.7%) had medial- lateral gap balancing in knee extension, 18 patients (94.7%) had medial-lateral gap balancing in 90° of knee flexion, 19 patients (100%) had medial gap balancing between knee extension and 90° of knee flexion, and 18 patients (94.7%) had lateral gap balancing between knee extension and 90° of knee flexion. The mean operation time was 126 minutes (range, 100-200 minutes). The mean intraoperative blood loss was 205 mL (range, 100-400 mL). Patients were followed up 4-8 months, with an average of 6.2 months. Postoperative complications included 1 deep vein thrombosis of lower extremities and 1 cerebral infarction. X-ray films showed that the mean HKA, lateral distal femoral angle, and medial proximal tibial angle were 179.8° (range, 178°-182°), 83.5° (range, 80°-87°), and 89.5° (range, 87°-93°), respectively. At last follow-up, WOMAC pain, stiffness, function, and total scores were 3.6±1.9, 0 (0, 2), 4 (2, 6), and 9 (5, 10), respectively, which improved when compared with preoperative scores (P<0.05). Twelve patients were very satisfied with the operation results and 7 patients were satisfied with the operation results. The overall satisfaction rate was 100%.ConclusionKnee 3 software can help to obtain good gap balancing and optimal lower limb alignment, with high patient’s satisfaction and good short-term effecectiveness.