west china medical publishers
Keyword
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Keyword "Congenital clubfoot" 2 results
  • LIMITED OPERATIONS AND Ilizarov TECHNIQUE FOR CORRECTION OF CONGENITAL CLUBFOOT IN ADOLESCENTS

    【Abstract】 Objective To observe the effectiveness of limited operations and Ilizarov techniques for correction of congenital clubfoot (CCF) in adolescents, and to explore the new methods and new ideas for functional reconstruction of CCF. Methods Between September 2003 and July 2010, 25 adolescent patients (40 feet) with CCF were treated. Of the 25 patients, 14 were male (20 feet) and 11 were female (20 feet) with an age range from 12 to 25 years (mean, 15.7 years). The left feet were involved in 4 cases, the right feet in 6 cases, and both feet in 15 cases. According to Qin’s clubfoot deformity scale, 9 feet were rated as degree I, 17 feet as degree II, and 14 feet as degree III. In these cases, 9 feet were accompanied by internal rotation deformities of crus and 1 case by subluxation of right hip joint. After soft tissue release and osteotomy, 9 feet (degree I) were fixed by composite external fixation instruments, 31 feet by Ilizarov external fixation instruments. The deformity was corrected from 5 to 7 days after operation with distraction of 0.5-1.0 mm/d, then distraction stopped when the ankle was corrected at a hyperextension of 5 to 10° and light valgus. The affected limb might undergo weight bearing walking with external fixation at corrected position for 4 to 6 weeks. If one had both feet deformity, staged operation should be performed with a surgery interval of 3 to 6 months (mean, 4 months). Results The fixation time was 6-12 weeks (mean, 8 weeks) in 9 feet fixed by composite external fixation instruments, and it was 6-17 weeks (mean, 13 weeks) in 31 feet fixed by Ilizarov external fixation. All 25 patients were followed up 8 months to 6 years with an average of 37 months. During distraction process, slight pin track infection occurred in 6 cases (6 feet), which were cured after expectant management. One patient had recurrence of the deformity at 2 years postoperatively, who obtained satisfactory correction after Ilizarov external fixation for 4 weeks. The satisfactory correction and foot function were achieved in the other feet with walking on full weight-bearing. According to International Clubfoot Study Group (ICFSG) score, the results were excellent in 28 feet, good in 10 feet, and fair in 2 feet, with an excellent and good rate of 95% at last follow-up. Conclusion Combined limited operation with Ilizarov technique for correcting adolescent CCF is accord with biology principle and minimally invasive surgical principle, so it is a safe,minimally invasive, and effective method. It also can broaden the operative indications and correct degree III talipes equinovarus which is unattainable by traditional orthopedic surgery.

    Release date:2016-08-31 04:21 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • COMPARISON OF LONG-TERM RESULTS BETWEEN MUSCLE-STRENGTH BALANCING PROCEDURE AND MCKAY PROCEDURE IN TREATING CONGENITAL CLUBFOOT

    Objective To compare the long-term results between theMckay procedure and the musclestrength balancing procedure in treatment of congenital clubfoot (CCF).Methods Thirty-seven children with 54 clubfeet were treated by the muscle-strength balancing procedure (31 feet) or the Mckay procedure (23 feet).There were 27 males (38 feet) and 10 females (16 feet). The average age at the time of surgery was 1.2 years (range, 5 months to 3.5 years). The deformity occurred on the left side in 7 patients, on the right side in 13, and on both sides in 17. During the musclestrength balancing procedure, the anterior tibial tendonwas transplanted to the middle or the lateral cuneiform, and the Achilles tendon was lengthened. During the Mckay procedure, the complete releasing of the softtissues and the lengthening of the tendons were performed routinely; in addition, the abductor hallucis was also excised. The clinical outcomes were evaluated with the Diméglio classification method. According to the Diméglio scoring system, 3 clubfeet were at Grade Ⅱ (score, 6-10); 26 clubfeet at Grade Ⅲ (score, 11-15); 25 clubfeet at Grade Ⅳ (score, 16-20). Based on the Diméglio grading system, all the patients were divided into two groups before operation. Group Aconsisted of 29 feet at Grade Ⅱ or Ⅲ (score, 12.55±1.84); Group B consistedof 25 feet at Grade Ⅳ (score, 17.20±1.08). The score in the group undergoingthe musclestrength balancing procedure was 14.16±2.83, and the score in the group undergoing the Mckay procedure was 15.43±2.63. Results All the patients were followed up for an average of 8.2 years (range, 5.0-10.5 years). According to the Diméglio grading system, 32 patients were at Grade Ⅰand 22 patients at Grade Ⅱ, and none of the patients at Grade Ⅲ or Ⅳ. Two patients undergoing the Mckay procedure developed the postoperative incision infection, but the incision wound healed after the dressing changes. The Diméglio score was 4.07±1.25 in Group A and 6.52±1.74 in Group B after operation, with a significant difference when compared with before operation (Plt;0.05). In Group A the two procedureshad no significant difference in effectiveness (Pgt;0.05); however, in Group B they had a significant difference (Plt;0.05). Judging by the correction degrees for the deformity on the different planes, the two procedures had no significant difference for correcting the equinus of hind foot (Pgt;0.05); however, in the correction degrees for the cross-foot and supination or adduction of the anterior foot, the Mckay procedure was significantly finer than the muscle-strength balancing procedure. It has a good biocompatibility. The mechanical test has showed that the Mckay procedure had the best result in the correction of the forefoot adduction. Conclusion For treatment of congenital clubfoot at Grades Ⅰ-Ⅲ, the musclestrength balancing procedure can achieve an excellent correction result; for treatment of congenital clubfoot at Grade Ⅳ, the Mckay procedure should be performed. No matter whichprocedure, the abductor hallucis excision is recommended to prevent poor correction for the anterior foot adduction. 

    Release date:2016-09-01 09:20 Export PDF Favorites Scan
1 pages Previous 1 Next

Format

Content