ObjectiveTo compare tacrolumus (FK506) with cyclosporine A (CsA) in clinical application to organ transplantation.MethodsThe literature in recent years has been reviewed and compared. ResultsFK506 was a powerful immunosuppression with a mechanism of action similar to that of CsA, but significantly superiori to CsA in terms of prophylaxis and treatment of allograft acute rejection, delay of chronic rejection, and withdrawal of steroid in early period. The cardiovascular mortality and chronic graft nephropathy (CGN),such as hypertension and hyperlipidemia were less frequently seen in FK506treated patients and FK506 also had an acceptable safety profile, including a low incidence of hypertrichosis,gingival hyperplasia and infections.However, CsA had been showed a better result in prevention of posttransplantation diabetes mellitus (PTDM ) and more economic agent than FK506. Pharmacokinetic studies showed CsA in the form of Sandimmun Neoral showed less inter an intrapatient variability than FK506.Meanwhile, the combination of MMF and FK506 or CsA has been proved effectively with excellent graft and patients survival. Conclusion FK506 and CsA are safe and effective long term maintenance immunosuppressive agents in organ transplantation with wonderful prospect.
OBJECTIVE To study the effect of combined application of external cyclosporine A (CsA) and CTLA4Ig in inhibiting rejection and inducing immune tolerance in composite tissue allograft. METHODS: The auricles with vessel pedicle were transplanted from Lewis rats to BN rats under microsurgery. CsA was spreaded on the surface of grafts in combination with administration of CTLA4Ig intraperitoneally after transplantation. The rejection response and survival time of grafts were observed, and the IL-2 level in serum was measured. RESULTS: The mean survival time was (7.8 +/- 1.7) days in control group. It was (15.2 +/- 1.9) days when recipients treated by CsA and (16.6 +/- 2.1) days by CTLA4Ig. Under the combination of CsA and CTLA4Ig, the mean survival time was significantly prolonged to (28.8 +/- 3.5) days (P lt; 0.05) with the lowest level of IL-2 in serum of recipients. CONCLUSION: The combined application of external CsA and CTLA4Ig inhibits rejection of allograft effectively, which can be a favorable therapy on composite tissue allo-transplantation.
Objective To assess the effectiveness and safety of cyclosporine A (CsA) for aplastic anemia (AA) in China. Methods Randomized controlled trails (RCTs) of CsA for AA were collected from CBMdisc (1978 to 2008), CNKI (1979 to 2008), and VIP (1989 to 2008). Other relevant journals were also hand searched. The methodological quality of included studies was evaluated, and data analyses were performed with The Cochrane Collaboration’s software RevMan 4.2.0. Results A total of 19 RCTs were included. As for the total effective rate and complete remission rate, significant differences were noted between CsA + androgen vs. androgen alone, CsA + androgen combination vs. androgen combination, as well as CsA + androgen + other drugs vs. androgen + other drugs [total effective rate: RRs and 95%CIs were 1.48 (1.28 to 1.70), 1.67 (1.17 to 2.39), and 1.51 (1.09 to 2.08); complete remission rate: RRs and 95%CIs were 2.06 (1.33 to 3.19), 3.52 (1.19 to 10.39), and 1.54 (1.00 to 2.38)]. Conclusion According to the domestic evidence, treatment with CsA for AA may improve the total effective rate and complete remission rate. However, more high quality clinical trials are expected for further study.
Objective To asses the clinical effectiveness and safety of combined treatment with antilymphocyte globulin (ATG) and cyclosporine A (CSA) versus antilymphocyte globulin alone in patients with aplastic anemia (AA). Methods Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified from MEDLINE (1966 to September 2007), EMBASE (1984 to September 2007), The Cochrane Library (issue 4, 2007) and CBM-disc (1978 to September 2007). The references of eligible studies were hand searched. RCTs involving ATG and CSA in the treatment of AA were included. Data were evaluated and extracted by two reviewers independently with designed extraction form. The Cochrane Collaboration’ s RevMan 4.2.10 software was used for data analyses. Results Two RCTs involving 160 patients were included. Two studies showed that the effective rate in the ATG+CSA group was significantly higher than that in the ATG group (Plt;0.0001). Two studies indicated that the survival rate in the ATG+CSA group was improved compared with the ATG group (P=0.0002). One study reported adverse effect. The ATG group caused more fever and serum diseases compared with the ATG+CSA group, but the ATG+CSA group had a higher incidence of hepatotoxicity. Conclusion Treatment with ATG+CSA for aplastic anemia has higher effective rate and survival rate than ATG alone. More trials of high quality are required.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of tacrolimus and cyclosporine A on acute rejection, chronic rejection and survival rate of patient and graft after renal transplantation. Methods We searched MEDLINE (1989 to Nov.2004), EMBASE (1989 to Nov.2004), The Chinese Biomedical Database (CBM) (1998 to Nov.2004), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 4, 2004) and handsearched 8 Chinese journals. Trials comparing tacrolimus with cyclosporine A after renal transplantation were included. The quality of included studies such as randomization, blinding, allocation concealment was evaluated and meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 4.2.7 software. Results Eighteen studies involving 3 738 patients were included. Tacrolimus was more effective in decreasing the incidence of acute rejection and chronic rejection than that of cyclosporine A with RR 0.65, 95％CI 0.56 to 0.75 at the end of 6 months; with RR 0.70, 95％CI 0.54 to 0.92 at the end of 12 months for number of patients of acute rejection. The pooled RR was 0.65 (95％CI 0.47 to 0.89) for number of patients of chronic rejection. Tacrolimus could reduce the severity of acute rejection. The relative risks of pathologic grade BanffⅠand Banff (Ⅱ＋Ⅲ) were 1.64 (95％CI 1.08 to 2.49) and 0.75 (95％CI 0.63 to 0.89) respectively. But there was no significant difference on the survival rate of patient and graft within 5 years between the two groups. The relative risk of 6, 12, 24, 36 and 60 months were 1.01 (95％CI 0.99 to 1.02), 1.00 (95％CI 0.99 to 1.02), 1.01 (95％CI 0.97 to 1.05), 1.00 (95％CI 0.97 to 1.03) and 0.97 (95％CI 0.88 to 1.07) respectively for the survival rate of patient and 1.04 (95％CI 1.01 to 1.07), 1.03 (95％CI 1.00 to 1.06), 0.99 (95％CI 0.91 to 1.07), 1.04 (95％CI 0.99 to 1.09) and 1.04 (95％CI 0.90 to 1.21) respectively for the survival rate of grafts. Conclusions On acute rejection and chronic rejection, tacrolimus is more effective than cyclosporine A, but there is no difference in the graft or patient survival rate.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus (TAC) and cyclosporine A (CsA) for patients after renal transplantation.MethodsPubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, CBM, WanFang Data and CNKI databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the efficacy and safety of TAC vs. CsA after renal transplantation from inception to December, 2018. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies, then, meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 12 RCTs involving 3 130 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: compared with CsA, the TAC had lower incidence of acute rejection at 6 months after renal transplantation (RR=0.61, 95%CI 0.50 to 0.74, P<0.000 01), and had higher glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (MD=4.20, 95%CI 1.07 to 7.34, P=0.009), lower incidence of dyslipidemia (RR=0.46, 95%CI 0.27 to 0.80, P<0.006), higher incidence of diabetes (RR=1.36, 95%CI 1.12 to 1.65, P=0.002) at 12 months after renal transplantation. There was no significant difference between two groups in the incidence of hypertension after renal transplantation (RR=0.90, 95%CI 0.69 to 1.17,P=0.43).ConclusionsCurrent evidence shows that, compared with CsA, TAC can significantly improve renal function, reduce the risk of acute rejection and dyslipidemia, but it can increase the risk of diabetes. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high-quality studies are needed to verify above conclusions.