ObjectiveTo explore the clinical effect and safety of laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery combined with gestrinone in the treatment of adenomyosis. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 82 patients with adenomyosis who accepted treatment in our hospital from January 2008 to April 2011. According to different treatment method, the patients were divided into three groups. Twenty-seven patients in the treatment group underwent laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery combined with postoperative treatment with gestrinone. For the 25 patients in the surgery group, only laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery was performed, and 30 other patients who only received oral gestrinone were designated as the medicine group. Dysmenorrhea, menstrual volume, uterine size, serum carcinoembryonic antigen 125 (CA125), anemia, and drug side effects were respectively recorded before and after surgery. ResultsThe dysmenorrhea degree reduced significantly in all the three groups. There was no significant difference in the degree of dysmenorrhea, menstrual volume, and uterine volume between the treatment group and the surgery group (P>0.05); the dysmenorrhea degree was significantly different between the treatment group and the medicine group (P<0.05); the differences in hemoglobin levels and the serum CA125 level between the treatment group and the surgery group 12 months later were significant (P=0.019, P=0.049). ConclusionThe laparoscopic cytoreductive surgery combined with gestrinone in treating adenomyosis can improve recent curative effect and provide more effective symptom control compared with surgery alone.
ObjectiveTo investigate the curative effects of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyper-thermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for treating the hepatocellular carcinoma with peritoneal metastasis. MethodsThe clinical data of 80 cases of hepatocellular carcinoma with peritoneal metastasis who were treated in our hospital from January 2004 to January 2012 were collected, and were classified into observation group (n=40) and control group (n=40) according to the treatment. Case of observation group received CRS+HIPEC, and cases of control group received CRS+conventional intraperitoneal injection of chemotherapy. Then the comparison of clinical effect and prog-nosis was performed. ResultsIn observation group, the results of completeness of cytoreduction (CC) grade was:31 cases in grade 0, 6 cases in grade 1, and 3 cases in grade 2. In control group, the results of CC grade was:32 cases in grade 0, 6 cases in grade 1, and 2 cases in grade 3. There was no significant difference between 2 groups in the CC grade (P=0.213). In addition, there were no significant differences between observation group and control group in operation time (6.8 hours vs. 6.5 hours), hospital stay (17.3 days vs.18.7 days), and incidence of adverse reactions[70.0% (28/40) vs. 60.0% (24/40)], P>0.05. All of the cases of observation group and control group were followed up for 10-61 months (average of 42.5 months) and 6-49 months (average of 30.2 months) respectively. During the follow up period, in observation group, there were 18 cases died, 12 cases suffered from recurrence, 5 cases suffered from metastasis, and the rest of 5 cases survived; in the control group, there were 26 cases died, 9 cases suffered from recurrence, and 5 cases suffered from metastasis. However, the survival situation was better in observation group than that of control group (P<0.01). ConclusionCombining CRS and HIPEC for treating hepatocellular carcinoma with peritoneal metastasis was safe and effective, which would be widely applied.
Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has been used in clinical setting, and is one of the optional treatment for peritoneal surface tumors. It can be used as adjuvant therapy to prevent peritoneal recurrence after gastric or colorectal cancer resection, or to treat those diseases with peritoneal metastasis alone through cytoreductive surgery +HIPEC or HIPEC alone, based on a multidisciplinary model. The updates of European HIPEC-related clinical trials, GASTRIPEC, GASTRICHIP, PRODIGE 7, PROPHYLOCHIP, COLOPEC, COMBATAC, were reported at the 11th International Workshop on Peritoneal Surface Malignancy. In those trials, there was no definitive result surporting that HIPEC treatment might bring survival benefits to patients with gastric or colorectal cancer. However, long-term follow-up results remain to be seen, and some studies are still recruiting. Although several studies were designed as phase Ⅲ trials, the overall sample size was small-scaled. In addition, in the trials, diagnostic laparoscopy were widely used in gastric or colorectal cancer patients, which was helpful to improve staging accuracy and optimizing treatment strategies. The indications for HIPEC therapy (peritoneal cancer index) and technical issues (duration, temperature, approach, and agents) need further investigate.