Objective To systematically review the impacts of general anesthesia using sevoflurane versus propofol on the incidence of emergence agitation in pediatric patients. Methods Such databases as PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library (Issue 4, 2012), CNKI, CBM, WanFang Data and VIP were electronically searched from inception to December 2012, for comprehensively collecting randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the impacts of general anesthesia using sevoflurane versus propofol on the incidence of emergence agitation in pediatric patients. References of included studies were also retrieved. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.1 software. Results A total of 9 RCTs involving 692 children were included, of which, six were pooled in the meta-analysis. The results of meta-analysis showed that: a) after anesthesia induction using sevoflurane, intravenous propofol maintenance was associated with a lower incidence of emergence agitation compared with sevoflurane maintenance (RR=0.57, 95%CI 0.39 to 0.84, P=0.004); and b) patients anesthetized with total intravenous propofol had a lower incidence of emergence agitation compared with total inhalation of sevoflurane (RR=0.16, 95%CI 0.06 to 0.39, Plt;0.000 1). Conclusion The incidence of emergence agitation after general anesthesia using sevoflurane is higher than that using propofol. Due to the limited quantity and quality, the application of sevoflurane should be chosen based on full consideration into patients’ conditions in clinic.
Objective To investigate the clinical features, etiology and treatment strategies of patients with delirium in emergency intensive care unit ( EICU) . Methods Patients with delirium during hospitalization between January 2010 and January 2012 were recruited from respiratory group of EICU of Beijing Anzhen Hospital. Over the same period, same amount of patients without delirium were randomly collected as control. The clinical datawere retrospectively analyzed and compared. Results The incidence of delirium was 7.5% ( 42/563) . All delirium patients had more than three kinds of diseases including lung infections, hypertension, coronary heart disease, respiratory failure, heart failure, renal failure, hyponatremia, etc. 50% of delirium patients received mechanical ventilation ( invasive/noninvasive) . The mortality of both the delirium patients and the control patients was 11.9% ( 5 /42) . However, the patients with delirium exhibited longer hospital stay [ 14(11) d vs. 12(11) d, P gt;0. 05] and higher hospitalization cost [ 28, 389 ( 58,999) vs. 19, 373( 21, 457) , P lt;0.05] when compared with the control group. 52.4% ( 22/42) of delirium patients were associated with primary disease. 9. 5% ( 4/42) were associated with medication. 38. 1% (16/42) were associated with ICU environment and other factors. Conclusions Our data suggest that the causes of delirium in ICU are complex. Comprehensive treatment such as removal of the relevant aggravating factors, treating underlying diseases, enhancing patient communication, and providing counseling can shorten their hospital stay, reduce hospitalization costs, and promote rehabilitation.
Delirium is an acute, transient, usually reversible, fluctuating disturbance in consciousness, attention, cognition, and perception. Delirium after cardiac operations is associated with increased morbidity, reduced cognitive functioning, increased short-term and long-term mortality, longer hospitalization and higher hospitalization cost. The diagnosis, prevention and treatment of delirium are of great importance for perioperative care of patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Effective delirium screening tools are very helpful for the recognition and monitoring of delirium after cardiac surgery. In recent years, there has been many new strategies for the treatment, nursing care and prevention of delirium after cardiac surgery. This review focuses on the incidence, risk factors, diagnostic methods, treatment and preventive strategies of delirium after cardiac surgery.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the clinical efficacy and safety of antipsychotics for delirium. MethodsDatabases including The Cochrane Library (Issue 5, 2015), PubMed, MEDLINE, EMbase, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data were electronically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about antipsychotics compared with placebo/blank for delirium from inception to May 2015. We also hand-searched related conference proceedings and references of included studies for additional studies. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was conducted by using RevMen 5.3 software. ResultsA total of 7 RCTs involving 712 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that there were no significant differences between the antipsychotics group and the placebo/blank group in mortality (RR=1.00, 95%CI 0.90 to 1.10, P=0.99), duration of delirium (MD=-1.53, 95%CI -4.95 to 1.89, P=0.38), length of stay (MD=-0.89, 95%CI -7.69 to 5.90, P=0.80), and ICU stay time (MD=-3.70, 95%CI -15.83 to 8.43, P=0.55). Compared with the placebo/ blank group, the antipsychotics could reduce the severity of delirium (SMD=-1.62, 95%CI -2.32 to -0.93, P<0.000 01). ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that the efficacy of antipsychotics in the treatment of delirium is not clear. Due to the limited quantity and quality of the included studies, the above conclusion needs to be further verified by more high quality studies.
Objective To evaluate the influence of early mobilization on delirium and respiratory dynamics in mechanically ventilated patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). Methods The study prospectively recruited 107 AECOPD patients who admitted between January 2014 and June 2015 and underwent mechanical ventilation.On basis of same routine treatment,the patients were randomly divided into a treatment group (54 cases)receiving regime of early mobilization,and a control group (53 cases)receiving routine sedation and analgesia treatment.The incidence of delirium,duration of delirium,time of mechanical ventilation,and ICU mortality were compared between two groups.The respiratory mechanical parameters including endogenous positive end expiratory pressure (PEEPi),airway resistance(Raw),static compliance(Cs),and dynamic compliance(Cd)before treatment,3 days and 5 days after treatment were also compared between two groups. Results Compared with the control group,the incidence of delirium decreased (59.3% vs. 77.4%),the duration of delirium [(1.8±1.1)d vs. (2.6±1.3)d] and mechanical ventilation[(6.2±3.4)d vs. (7.9±4.2)d] reduced in the treatment group with significant difference(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in respiratory mechanical parameters before treatment between two groups(P>0.05).While at 3 days and 5 days after treatment,PEEPi decreased [(6.23±2.83)cm H2O vs. (7.42±2.62)cm H2O,(4.46±2.20)cm H2O vs. (5.92±2.51)cm H2O],Raw decreased [(20.35±7.15)cmH2O·L-1·s-1 vs. (23.23±6.64)cm H2O·L-1·s-1,(16.00±5.41)cm H2O·L-1·s-1 vs. (19.02±6.37)cm H2O·L-1·s-1],Cd increased [(25.20±9.37)mL/cm H2O vs (21.75±7.38)mL/cm H2O,(27.46±5.45)mL/cm H2O vs. (24.40±6.68)mL/cm H2O] in the treatment group compared with the control group(P<0.05),and the difference in Cs was not significant(P>0.05).No complications such as slippage,physical injury,or malignant arrhythmia occurred in two groups.The mortality slightly decreased in the treatment group compared with the control group (5.6% vs 11.3%),but the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05). Conclusions The incidence of delirium is high in mechanically ventilated patients with AECOPD.Early mobilization can reduce the incidence and duration of delirium,decrease the airway resistance,increase the dynamic lung compliance,relieve dynamic pulmonary hyperinflation and reduce PEEPi,so as to improve the respiratory function and shorten the time of mechanical ventilation.Therefore,early mobilization is an effective and safe regime for AECOPD patients underwent mechanical ventilation.
ObjectiveTo explore the applicability of early goal-directed sedation (EGDS) in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with mechanical ventilation.MethodsAn prospective double blind study was conducted. ICU patients with mechanical ventilation in the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinzhou Medical University were recruited as research objects by chester sampling from September 2015 to September 2017, and divided into an experimental group and a control group by stratified randomization. Two groups were sedated on the basis of adequate analgesia. The experimental group adopted the EGDS strategy that dexmedetomidin was the first choice to be infused at the rate of 1 μg·kg–1·h–1. And the patients were given Richmond agitation-sedation score (RASS) on the interval of 4 hours: used additionally propofol and midazolam if RASS>2, or reduced right metomomidin at the speed of 0.2 μg·kg–1·h–1 per 30 min if RASS<–3, and stopped sedation until RASS of –2 to 0. The control group adopted routine sedation strategy that propofol was the first choice to be infused and combined with dexmedetomidine and midazolam until RASS score in –2 to –3. The doses of sedative drugs, mechanical ventilation time, ICU-stayed time, total hospitalization time and the incidence of adverse events such as delirium, accidental extubation, and ICU death were compared between two groups.ResultsSixty-sis cases were selected in the experimental group and 71 in the control group. The baseline data such as gender, age, acute physiology chronic health evaluation Ⅱ (APACHEⅡ), or basic diseases in two groups had no significant differences. Compared with the control group, the per capita total doses of dexmedetomidine, propofol and midazolam in the experimental group were significantly less [right metopromicine (μg): 154.45±27.86 vs. 378.85±39.76; propofol (mg): 4 490.03±479.88 vs. 7 349.76±814.31; midazolam (mg): 255.38±46.24 vs. 562.79±97.26; all P<0.01], mechanical ventilation time, ICU-stayed time, total hospitalization time were significantly lower [mechanical ventilation time (d): 7.7±3.3vs. 11.7±3.6; ICU-stayed time (d): 10.2±3.9 vs. 19.2±4.1, total hospitalization time (d): 29.9±4.6 vs. 50.4±9.1; all P<0.01]. The Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed that the incidence of delirium in the experimental group was significantly lower than that in the control group (log-rankχ2=5.481, P<0.05). The accidental extubation rate and accidental fatality rate in two groups had no significant differences (log-rankχ2=0.078, 0.999, P>0.05).ConclusionEGDS can not only reduce the dose of sedative drugs, shorten the mechanical ventilation time, the ICU-stayed time and the total hospitalization time, but also reduce the incidence of delirium, so it has a positive impact in ICU patients with mechanical ventilation.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the delirium risk prediction models in intensive care unit (ICU) patients.MethodsThe Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, Ovid, VIP, WanFang Date and CNKI databases were electronically searched to collect studies on delirium risk prediction models in intensive care unit patients from inception to December, 2018. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, evaluated the included studies according to the CHARMS checklist, and then systematic review was performed to evaluate the risk prediction models.ResultsA total of 9 studies were included, of which 7 were prospective studies. Six models were internally validated. All studies reported the area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) over 0.7 (0.739-0.926). The reduction of cognitive reserve and increased blood urea nitrogen were the most commonly reported predisposing and precipitating factors of delirium among all prediction models. Methodologically, the absence or unreported of the blind method, to a certain extent, partially increase the risk of bias.ConclusionsNine prediction models all have great power in early identifying and screening patients who are at high risk of developing ICU delirium. On the basis of judiciously selecting a practical prediction model for clinical practice or carrying out a large sample-size prospective cohort study to construct the localized prediction model, stratified prevention strategies should be formulated and implemented according to the risk stratification results to reduce the incidence of ICU delirium and accelerate the rational allocation of medical resources for delirium prevention.
ObjectiveTo investigate the risk factors of delirium in mechanical ventilation patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).MethodsA total of 97 mechanically ventilated non-hypertensive patients with COPD who were admitted to this department from January 2018 to October 2018 were selected as subjects. The patients were divided into 49 cases with delirium and 48 cases non-delirium according to the Consciousness Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Uint. The examined data were collected in the patients such as pH, arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2), arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health EvaluationⅡ (APACHEⅡ) scores were calculated in the pre-mechanical (d0) and mechanically ventilated 3rd (d3), 5th (d5) days. The mechanical ventilation days were recorded in the two groups. Logistic regression analysis was used to screen the risk factors influencing delirium of patients.ResultsThe PaCO2, NSE, APACHEⅡ scores and mechanical ventilation days were higher in the delirium group than in the non-delirium group ［(88.1±7.5) vs. (85.3±6.2) mm Hg; (28.4±5.8) vs. (26.1±3.3) μg/L; (23.7±3.9) vs. (21.7±2.6); (7.5±1.3) d vs. (6.6±1.2) d］ and PaO2 were lower than non-delirium group ［(54.9±5.5) vs. (57.2±3.1) mm Hg］, the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that PaO2, NSE, APACHEⅡ scores and mechanical ventilation days were risk factors for delirium in mechanically ventilated patients with COPD (regression coefficients were –0.177, 0.163, 0.203, 0.597 respectively, P<0.05). The PaO2 and APACHEⅡ scores of mechanical ventilation on the 3rd and 5th day of the two groups ［d3 (88.3±5.3) vs. (89.1±6.9) mm Hg; d5 (90.3±9.0) vs. (91.3±6.4) mm Hg; d3 (21.7±3.0) vs. (21.4±2.2); d5 (20.9±2.8) vs. (20.7±2.1)］ were not statistically significant (P>0.05).The NSE changes on the 3rd and 5th day of mechanical ventilation ［d3 (30.0±5.3) vs. (26.8±3.6) μg/L; d5 (27.3±4.3) vs. (25.7±2.6) μg/L］ were statistically significant (P<0.05).ConclusionPaO2, NSE, APACHEⅡ score and mechanical ventilation days are risk factors for delirium in COPD patients with mechanical ventilation and NSE is one of the more important risk factors.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the quality of guidelines for the management of delirium in adult patients in the last ten years, so as to provide references for updating, selection, implementation guidelines and delirium management optimization.MethodsWe searched guidelines from databases including PubMed, EMbase, WanFang Data and CNKI, and websites of guidelines from January 1st 2010 to September 1st 2019. Guidelines were comprehensively screened, evaluated based on AGREE Ⅱ and data was independently extracted by two researchers.ResultsGuidelines of NICE, RNAO and SIGN had higher scores, while CSCCM’s and IPS’s gained lower. Among domains of AGREE Ⅱ, Domain I (scope and purpose) and IV (clarity of presentation) scored the highest, with a minimum of Domain Ⅱ (stakeholder involvement) and V (applicability). Delirium management focused on screening, prediction, prevention and treatment both pharmacologically and non-pharmacologically, and information support.ConclusionsFuture development of delirium guidelines should follow the methodology of guideline development, update or adjustment, and dedicate to every domain, especially domain of application. Medical staffs can establish our own domestic guidelines based on high quality guidelines, to promote knowledge translation and delirium management.
Objective To evaluate the effect of exogenous melatonin and its analogues on the prevention of delirium in critically ill patients by meta-analysis. Methods Randomized controlled trials of exogenous melatonin and its analogues in the prevention of delirium in critically ill patients were searched by computer from the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chongqing VIP, Wanfang, and SinoMed databases. The trial group was treated with melatonin or its analogues, while the control group was treated with placebo. The retrieval period was from the establishment of database to January 14th, 2021. Two researchers independently evaluated the literature quality, and meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software. Results A total of 11 randomized controlled trials containing 1177 patients were enrolled, including 588 patients in the trial group and 589 patients in the control group. The results showed that exogenous melatonin and its analogues could reduce the occurrence of delirium in critically ill patients [odds ratio (OR)=0.45, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.22, 0.91), P=0.03] and shorten the time of mechanical ventilation [standard mean difference (SMD)=−0.49, 95%CI (−0.94, −0.03), P=0.04], while might not affect the mortality rate [OR=0.73, 95%CI (0.46, 1.17), P=0.19] or length of intensive care unit stay [SMD=−0.05, 95%CI (−0.26, 0.15), P=0.61]. Conclusions The current evidence shows that exogenous melatonin and its analogues have some effect on reducing the occurrence of delirium and shortening the duration of mechanical ventilation in critically ill patients, and have no significant effect on reducing the mortality or length of intensive care unit stay. The above conclusions need to be confirmed by more high-quality studies.