Objective To systematically review the effectiveness and safety of autologous implantation of stem cells for diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). Methods Randomized controlled trials on relevant studies were retrieved in databases including CBM (1978-2011.6), CNKI (1979-2011.6), MEDLINE (1950-2011.6), PubMed (1950-2011.6), EMbase (1970-2011.6) and The Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2011). References of the included studies were also retrieved. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and assess the methodological quality of the included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.0 software.Results Four RCTs involving 68 patients (136 limbs) were included, most of which were low in methodological quality. The results of meta-analysis indicated that, autologous stem cell therapy improved or even eliminated DPN symptoms including pain, numbness, and cold sensation in the limbs, intermittent limping, and rest pain. Compared with the routine therapy, autologous stem cell therapy improved tibial sensory nerve conduction velocity (MD=5.75, 95%CI 3.86 to 7.64, Plt;0.000 01), tibial motor nerve conduction velocity (MD=4.04, 95%CI 0.90 to 7.18, P=0.001), sural sensory nerve conduction velocity (MD=7.47, 95%CI 4.00 to 10.94, Plt;0.000 1), and sural motor nerve conduction velocity (MD=3.38, 95%CI 0.07 to 7.58, P=0.05), with no adverse reaction reported. Conclusion Current evidence shows that, autologous stem cell therapy is effective in treating DPN. Due to the lack of high quality studies, more high quality RCTs are needed to verify the above conclusion.
Objective To make individualized evidence-based treatment for patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Methods Based on the clinical questions we raised, evidence was collected and critically assessed. Patients’ preferences was also taken into consideration in the decision-making treatment. Results 157 studies were retrieved and finally 15 randomized controlled trials, 14 systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and 1 clinical guidelines were considered eligible. The evidence indicated that the first step in management of patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy should aim for stable and optimal glycemic control; there was no statistically significant difference between aldose reductase inhibitors and placebo in the treatment of diabetic polyneuropathy, the same to nerve growth factor; alpha-lipoic acid is superior to placebo in reducing symptoms of diabetic peripheral neuropathy; 5-hydroxytryptamine and norepinephrine uptake inhibitor, tricyclic antidepressants and anticonvulsants might alleviate the pain in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy; vitamin B and capsaicin cream are is effective and safe in the management of diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain. The individualized treatment plans were developed based on the available evidence. After 3 month of treatment, the blood sugar returned to normal and symptoms were alleviated. Conclusion The treatment efficacy in diabetic peripheral neuropathy has been improved by determining an individulized treatment plan according to evidence-based methods.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) for diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). Methods We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMbase, CNKI, VIP and handsearched Chinese Journal of Metabolism, Chinese Journal of Diabetes and New Chinese Medicine. Randomized controlled trials of clinical therapeutic studies on PGE1 for DPN were included. The quality of included studies was evaluated and Meta-analysis was performed. Results Thirty-one trials involving 2 497 participants were included. Meta-analysis indicated that PGE1 was more effective than Vitamin B, Placebo and other microcirculation improving drugs in improving symptoms and signs of DPN. The RR (95%CI) were ［RR=1.75, 95％CI (1.54, 2.00)］, ［RRpooled=1.57, 95％CI (1.42, 1.74)］and［RR=1.31, 95％CI (1.19, 1.45)］respectively. PGE1 was more effective than Vitamin B, Placebo and other microcirculation improving drugs in improving nerve conduction velocity (NCV) of DPN patients. For spontaneous pain and hypesthesia of DPN patients, Lipo-PGE1 was more effective compared with PGE1-CD and the RR (95%CI) was［RR=1.43, 95％CI (1.16, 1.76)］. Slight adverse effects were reported in 16 studies. Conclusion Based on this review, PGE1 is effective for DPN. However, the evidence is not b enough due to the low quality of included trials. Further large-sample and multi-center studies are needed.
Objective To review systematically whether there is enough existing evidence that methylcobalamin is effective and safe in the treatment of the patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy.Methods A Cochrane systematic review of all relevant randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials of methycobalamin for diabetic peripheral neuropathy was performed. Clinical trials were searched from Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (Issue 4, 2003), MEDLINE (January 1966 to January 2004), EMBASE (January 1980 to January 2004), the Chinese Biological Medicine Database (1978 to January 2004), the Chinese Science and Technology Journal Full-text Database (1989 to January 2004) and references of all included trials. The selection of studies, data extraction and assessment of methodological quality were performed independently by two reviewers. The following outcomes were assessed: effectiveness of clinical signs and symptoms, sensory nerve and motor nerve conduction velocities and serious adverse events of methylcobalamin. Results Thirty randomized clinical trials including 1 949 patients met the inclusion criteria. The quality of the most included trials was of low level. The "funnel plot" of the comparison of thirteen studies of methylcobalamin with other B Vitamins studies showed symmetry, which indicated less possible publication bias and the result was partly reliable, but it could not indicate the whole publication biases. The results of meta-analysis indicated that methylcobalamin showed significantly positive effects on the improvement of the signs and symptoms of peripheral neuropathy, and the effects were better than the other vitamin B agents. The increase of some nerves conduction velocities by methylcobalamin was better than by the other vitamin B. No serious adverse events were observed during the treatment period.Conclusions Methylcobalamin appears to be a safe and effective treatment on diabetic peripheral neuropathy. However, the evidence is not b because of the low quality of most trials. Rigorously designed, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trials of methylcobalamin for diabetic peripheral neuropathy are needed to further assess the effect.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tetramethylpyrazine (TMP) for diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). Methods Randomized controlled trials were identified from CBM (1978-2003.3), TCMLRS (1980-2003.3), Medline (1970-2003.3), EMbase (1970-2003.3) and Cochrane Library (issue 3, 2003). We handsearched Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine (1990-2002), New Chinese Medicine (1990-2002), Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine (1990-2002) and Research of Traditional Chinese Medicine (1990-2002). Papers of the controlled trials of clinical therapeutic studies on DPN treatment by Chinese medicine herb TMP were included and analyzed according to the criteria of the Cochrane Handbook in 1997. Results Six RCTs involving 669 patients were included, with all trials of low methodological quality. Meta-analysis indicated TMP was more effective than western medicine on pain or numbness of extremities of DPN [The pooled OR = 10.12, 95%CI (6.70 to15.28), P=0.000] and motor nerve conduction velocity change of common peroneal nerves and median nerves . Only one trial reported the side effects of TMP, such as dizziness and headache. Conclusions Based on the review, TMP infusion may have positive effect on DPN. However, the evidence is not b enough due to the general low methodological quality, so we can’t draw a reliable conclusion about the effects of TMP for DPN at the moment. Further large randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trial are needed.
Objective To systematically evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Puerarin on diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Methods A systematic review and evaluation of all available relevant randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials of Puerarin for diabetic peripheral neuropathy from Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (150 issue of 2003), Medline (1966-2003. 2), EMbase (1984-2001. 12. 4), and the Chinese Biological Medicine Database (1978-2003. 2) were performed. The selection of studies, data extraction, and assessment of methodological quality were performed independently by two reviewers. The following outcomes were assessed: effectiveness of clinical symptoms, sensory nerve and motor nerve conduction velocities, and severe adverse events of Puerarin. Results Ten randomized controlled clinical trials including 726 patients met the inclusion criteria. At the end of the treatment, compared to general treatment or vitamin B, Puerarin showed significant positive effects on the total effect rate of therapy and increased peripheral nerve conduction velocity. No severe adverse events were observed during the treatment period. However, most included trials show some degree of study design or analysis defect. Conclusions Our analysis suggests that Puerarin appears to be an effective and safe treatment for diabetic peripheral neuropathy. However, due to the low quality trials included in this review, more rigorously designed, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of Puerarin for diabetic peripheral neuropathy are needed to further assess its usefulness in diabetes peripheral neuropathy patients.
ObjectiveTo study the effect of combined treatment using pancreatic kinionogenase enteric-coated tab and mecobalamin injection on diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) patients. MethodsWe collected 84 subjects with DPN who received treatment from January 2012 to December 2012 in our hospital, and we randomly divided them into treatment group (42 subjects, using pancreatic kinionogenase enteric-coated tab and methylcobalamin injection) and control group (42 subjects, using mecobalamine only). Subjects in the treatment group were given oral pancreatic kininogenase at 120 unit/times and 3 times/day, and methylcobalamin intravenous injection at 1 mg/day for 14 days. Subjects in the control group were only given methylcobalamin intravenous injection at 1 mg/day for 14 days. ResultsIn the treatment group, 22 subjects showed excellent, 19 subjects effective and 1 subject ineffective outcome. In the control group, 8 subjects showed excellent, 22 effective and 12 ineffective outcome. The difference between the two groups is statistically significant (P<0.01). Compared with no treatment, the nerve conduction velocity in both the two groups has been improved. The improvement in the treatment group is significantly better than that of the control group (P<0.01), and all of them had no obvious adverse reaction during the treatment. ConclusionThe combined treatment using pancreatic kinionogenase enteric-coated tab and methylcobalamin injection on DPN is better than using methylcobalamin only.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the traditional Chinese medicine fumigation curative effect for the treatment of various diabetic peripheral neuropathy. MethodsDatabases such as China Biology Medicine Database, VIP, China Knowledge Resource Integrated Database, WanFang Data, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched by computer for controlled clinical trials consistent with the inclusive criteria from the establishment of these databases until February 2016. The literature quality evaluation method of Cochrane system evaluation manual was used to evaluate the methodological quality of the studies, and then relevant data were extracted for Meta-analysis with RevMan 5.1 software. ResultsA total of 15 randomized controlled trials involving 1579 patients were included. Meta-analysis showed that 15 days after intervention, the total effective rate of the traditional Chinese medicine fumigation group was higher than that of the western medicine group, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant [RR=1.39, 95%CI (1.25, 1.55), P<0.00001]; one month after intervention, the total effective rate of the traditional Chinese medicine fumigation group was significantly higher than that of the western medicine group [RR=1.26, 95%CI (1.15, 1.38), P<0.00001]; two months after intervention, the total effective rate of the traditional Chinese medicine fumigation group was significantly higher than that of the western medicine group [RR=1.22, 95%CI (1.10, 1.36), P=0.0002]. After 1 month of treatment, motor nerve conduction velocity motion [WMD=4.42 m/s, 95%CI (3.40, 5.43) m/s, P<0.00001] and median nerve sensory nerve conduction velocity [WMD=4.02 m/s, 95%CI (2.96, 5.08) m/s, P<0.00001] increased significantly more in the traditional Chinese medicine fumigation group. ConclusionThe Chinese medicine fumigation treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathy is better than oral or intramuscular vitamin B12, vitamin B1, oral oryzanol and so on.