Objective To evaluate the short-term results of discectomy combined with Isobar non-fusion internal fixation. Methods Between May 2006 and May 2008, 65 cases of single segment lumbar disc protrusion were random surgically treated by discectomy combined with Isobar non-fusion internal fixation (34 cases, group A) and single discectomy (31 cases, group B), respectively. In group A, there were 18 males and 16 females with an average age of 38.8 years (range, 23-51 years); the involved segments were L2,3 (1 case), L3,4 (4 cases), L4,5 (20 cases), and L5, S1 (9 cases), including 11 cases of protrusion type, 16 cases of prolapsed-type, and 7 cases of sequestered type; and the mean disease duration was 7.2 months (range, 1-66 months). In group B, there were 19 males and 12 females with an average age of 39.2 years (range, 21-49 years); the involved segments were L3,4 (2 cases), L4,5 (24 cases), and L5, S1 (5 cases), including 13 cases of protrusion type, 15 cases of prolapsed-type, and 3 cases of sequestered type; and the mean disease duration was 6.5 months (range, 3 weeks to 72 months). There was no significant difference in the general data between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). The surgical results were assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS) for back/leg pain and the Oswestry disabil ity index (ODI). The height of involved intervertebral space was measured dynamically after operation. Results The patients of two groups were followed up 32 months on average (range, 24-49 months). All cl inical symptoms of the patients were notably improved in 2 groups. One patient in group B experienced postoperative cerebral fluid leakage, and was cured after extubation, changing posture, and other measures. There was no implant failure, such as pedicle fracture, screw loosening, or screw malposition during the follow-up. The ODI and VAS were significantlyimproved after operation. The back and leg pain VAS scores at each time point were decreased significantly when compared with
Objective To investigate the effectiveness of Quadrant retractor for the treatment of recurrent lumbar disc protrusion. Methods Between July 2008 and March 2010, 18 cases of recurrent lumbar disc protrusion were treated with Quadrant. There were 13 males and 5 females with an average age of 43 years (range, 35-67 years). Involved segments includedL4, 5 in 6 cases and L5, S1 in 12 cases. The time between first operation and recurrence was 12-120 months (mean, 42.8 months). Before operation, radiological evaluation including X-ray, CT, and MRI were performed. Visual analogue scale (VAS) score and modified MacNab criteria were used to evaluate the effectiveness. Results The operation time was 40-80 minutes (mean, 60 minutes), and the amount of blood loss was 80-120 mL (mean, 100 mL). All operations were performed successfully, and no compl ication of infection and nerve injury occurred. Incisions healed by first intention. Cerebrospinal fluid leakage occurred in 2 cases and was cured at 3 days after operation by removal of drainage. Eighteen patients were followed up 12-30 months (mean, 22 months). The VAS score of leg pain was decreased from 7.3 ± 2.2 preoperatively to 2.0 ± 1.3 at the final follow-up, showing significant difference (t=11.08, P=0.00). According to modified MacNab criteria, the results were excellent in 12 patients and good in 6 patients. No recurrence was found during follow-up. Conclusion Discectomy via Quadrant retractor is a safe and effective minimally invasive surgical technique in treating recurrent lumbar disc protrusion.
Objective To compare the therapeutic effect of conventional discectomy, posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) on the recurrent lumbar disc protrusion (RLDP). Methods From January 2000 to January 2008, 65 patients with RLDP underwent different surgical procedures, namely conventional discectomy (group A, 25 cases), PLIF (group B, 22 cases), and TLIF (group C, 18 cases). There were 44 males and 21 females aged 26-65 years old (average 41 years old). All the patients were single-level protrusion, including 33 cases at the L4, 5 level and 32 cases at the L5, S1 level. The primary procedure included laminectomy discectomy in 39 patients, unilateral hemilaminectomy discectomy in 15 patients, and bilateral laminectomy and total laminectomy discectomy in 11patients. The recurrent time to the primary operation was 13-110 months (average 64 months). The location of recurrent disc protrusion was at the ipsilateral side in 47 cases and the contralateral side in 18 cases. No significant differences among three groups were evident in terms of basel ine data (P gt; 0.05). Results The incision all healed by first intention. The incidence of perioperative compl ication in group A (24.0%) and group B (22.3%) was significantly higher than that of group C (5.6%) (P lt; 0.05), and there was no significant difference between group A and group B (P gt; 0.05). The operation time and bleed loss during operation of group B were obviously higher than that of group A and group C (P lt; 0.05), and there was no significant difference between group A and group C (P gt; 0.05). There were no significant differences among three groups in terms of the length of hospital ization (P gt; 0.05). Six-one patients were followed up for 12-36 months (average 20 months). At 1 week after operation, the satisfied rate of patients was 84.0% in group A, 81.8% in group B, and 88.9% in group C (P gt; 0.05). All the patients in group B and group C achieved fusion uneventfully. There were no significant differences among three groups in terms of visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry disabil ity index (ODI) when compared the preoperative value with the final follow-up value (P gt; 0.05). There was significant difference within group A, B, and C in terms of VAS and ODI when compared the preoperative value with the final follow-up value (P lt; 0.05), but there were no significant differences among three groups in the improvement rate (P gt; 0.05). The intervertebral space grading method proposed by Roberts et al. was adopted to evaluate the intervertebral space height (ISH), the preoperative value was 2.04 ± 0.93 in group A, 2.18 ± 0.91 in group B, and 2.11 ± 0.90 in group C, andat the final follow-up, the value was 2.64 ± 0.58 in group A, 1.05 ± 0.59 in group B, and 1.06 ± 0.42 in group C. There were significant differences among three groups in the ISH when compared the properative value with the final follow-up value (P lt; 0.05). Conclusion All of the three surgical procedures are effective for RLDP, but conventional discectomy and PLIF have more compl ications than TLIF. Conventional discectomy may result in the further narrow of the intervertebral space and the occurrence of segment instabil ity, whereas TLIF is safer, more effective, and one of the ideal methods to treat RLDP.
To assess long-term outcomes of reoperation for recurrent lumbar disc herniation, and to compare results of different methods. Methods There were 95 patients who had reoperation for recurrent lumbar discherniation between February 1998 to February 2003, among whom a total of 89 (93.7%) were followed up and their primary data were reviewed. There were 76 patients, with the mean age of 42 years (range from 23 to 61), who met the inclusion criteria and were included. Among them, there were 55 males and 21 females. All patients had the history of more than one sciatic nervepain. The mean recurrent time was 69 months(range from 8 to 130 months). There were 48 patients in L4,5 and 28 patients in L5, S1, of whom we chose 30 to undergo larger vertebral plate discectomy (or two-side fenestration) and nucleus pulpose discectomy (group A), 24 to undergo the whole vertebral discectomy (group B) and 22 to undergo the whole vertebral discectomy and 360degrees intervertebral fusion(group C). The patients’ cl inical results in the three groups were compared, and the cl inical curative effects were evaluated by using cl inical functional assessment standard. Results Cl inical outcomes were excellent or good in 80.3% of the patients, including 80.0% of group A, 79.2% of group B and 81.8% of group C. There was no significant difference in each group (P gt; 0.05). These three groups were not different in age, pain-free interval and follow-up duration (P gt; 0.05). The mean intraoperative blood losses in the three groups were (110.7 ± 98.8), (278.7 ± 256.3), (350.7 ± 206.1) mL, respectively. The mean surgery time were (65.9 ± 22.8), (111.6 ± 24.3), (127.3 ± 26.7) minutes, respectively, and the mean hospital ization time were (6.7 ± 1.4), (10.2 ± 1.8), (12.2 ± 2.3) days, respectively. Group A was significantly less than group B or C (P lt; 0.05) and there was no significant difference between group B and C. All the patients were followed up for 36 to 96 months with an average of 86 months, and with (87.6 ± 27.0), (84.5 ± 19.8), (83.6 ± 13.5) months of group A, B and C, respectively. At the endof the follow-up, there were more cases of spinal instabil ity at the same level in group B (19 patients) than in group A (1 patient) or group C (no patient) in X-ray, and the difference was significant (P lt; 0.05). Conclusion Reoperation for recurrent lumbar disc herniation is effective. Larger vertebral plate discectomy or tow-side fenestration is recommended for managing recurrent lumbar disc herniation.
Objective To explore the influence of discectomy and artificial disc replacement on the upper lumbar facet joint and to provide the evidence for use of artificial disc replacement. Methods Under the loads of 200-2 000 N axis pressure and 1-10 Nm back-extending/side-bending pressure on the 7 fresh adult corpses, the pressure of L3,4facet joint was measured in the case of L4,5disc integrity, discectomy and artificial disc replacement and the statistical analysis was done.ResultsUnder the same load (axis, back-extending/side bending), there were significant differences (Plt;0.01) in the pressure of upper lumbar facet jointboth between disc integrity and discectomy and between discectomy and artificial disc replacement, and there was no difference(Pgt;0.05) between disc integrity and artificial disc replacement. Conclusion The stress ofupper lumbar facet joint reduced after discectomy, it implies that simply discectomy may change biomechanics of lumbar and lead to secondary lumbar structure degeneration. The stress of upper lumbar facet joint is close to the normal value after artificial disc replancement, it implies that artificial disc replacement may protect lumbar structure. It provides some biomechanics foundation and evidence for artificial disc replacement.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effect and effectiveness analysis of different approaches of transforaminal endoscope on extirpation amount of nuclues pulposus.MethodsBetween August 2011 and December 2014, a total of 165 patients with lumbar disc herniation were retrospectively enrolled and were treated with nucleus pulposus discectomy through transforaminal endoscope. The patients were randomly divided into 4 groups according to different approach of transforaminal endoscope. The posterolateral approach (Yeung’s technology) was used in group A (42 cases), transforaminal endoscopic spine system (TESSYS) technology was used in group B (40 cases), improved transforaminal endoscopic access (ITEA) technology was used in group C (43 cases), and interlaminar approach (40 cases) was used in group D (40 cases). There was no significant difference in gender, age, disease duration, symptomatic side, and segments among 4 groups (P>0.05). The extirpation amount of nuclues pulposus was calculated and compared among 4 groups; the effectiveness was evaluated by pre- and post-operative visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Oswestry disability index (ODI), lumbar curvature index (LCI), and intervertebral height.ResultsThe discectomy amount of nucleus pulposus was (3.7±0.8), (3.6±0.7), (4.5±1.1), and (3.0±0.8) cm3 in groups A, B, C, and D, respectively. The amount of group C was significantly larger than that of the other 3 groups (P<0.05), and the amount of group D was significantly smaller than that of the other 3 groups (P<0.05); no significant difference was found between groups A and B (P>0.05). Cerebrospinal fluid leakage was found in 1 case; no other postoperative complications including intervertebral space infection and epidural hematoma was found. All the incisions healed by first intension. All the patients were followed up 12-24 months (mean, 18 months), and no typical symptoms of recurrence was found during the follow-up period. There was no significant difference in preoperative lower back pain VAS score, lower extremities VAS score, and ODI scores among 4 groups (P>0.05). The above scores at last follow-up were significantly improved when compared with preoperative ones in each group (P<0.05), but no significant difference of above scores and recovery values was found among 4 groups (P>0.05). The difference in LCI and intervertebral height at preoperation and at last follow-up were not significant between 4 groups (P>0.05). The difference in LCI and intervertebral height of each group between at preoperation and last follow-up were not significant (P>0.05). And the recovery value of LCI and the lost of height at last follow-up also showed no significant differences between 4 groups (P>0.05).ConclusionThe ITEA technology can give a wider field of view than other technologies. It is more convenient to find and remove the nucleus pulposus. However, the appropriate operative approaches should be chosen according to the symptoms and characteristics of lumbar disc herniation.
ObjectiveTo investigate the difference between four transforaminal endoscopic approaches in the treatment of serious lumbar disc herniation.MethodsBetween October 2010 and February 2015, a total of 122 patients with serious lumbar disc herniation were enrolled and treated with discectomy under transforaminal endoscope. The patients were divided into 4 groups according to the different approaches. The transforaminal endoscopic spine system (TESSYS) technology was used in group A (31 cases), Yeung endoscopic spine system (YESS) technology was used in group B (30 cases), improved transforaminal endoscopic access (ITEA) technology was used in group C (31 cases), and interlaminar dorsal access (IDA) technology was used in group D (30 cases). There was no significant difference in gender, age, disease duration, lesion segment, and preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score of low back pain, VAS score of bilateral lower extremities pain, Oswestry disability index (ODI), intervertebral height, lumbar curvature index (LCI), and disc degeneration grading between groups (P>0.05). The removal volume of nucleus pulposus was compared; after operation, VAS score, ODI score, LCI, intervertebral height, and disc degeneration grading were used to evaluate the effectiveness.ResultsThe removal volumes of nucleus pulposus in groups A, B, C, and D were (3.6±0.9), (3.5±0.7), (4.6±1.0), (3.1±1.1) cm3, respectively. There were significant differences between groups (P<0.05). All incisions healed by first intention, and no early postoperative complications was found. All cases were followed up 12-35 months, with an average of 24 months. During follow-up, there was no recurrence of nucleus pulposus herniation, infection of intervertebral space, cerebrospinal fluid leakage, epidural hematoma, or other complications. At last follow-up, the VAS scores of low back pain and bilateral lower extremities pain, and ODI scores in each group significantly improved when compared with those before operation (P<0.05); there was no significant difference in the scores and improvements between groups after operation (P>0.05). At last follow-up, the disc degeneration grading in group B significantly improved when compared with that before operation (P<0.05); there was no significant difference between groups (P>0.05). At last follow-up, there was no significant difference in LCI of each group when compared with that before operation (P>0.05); and there was no significant difference in LCI and loss value between groups (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the intervertebral height of the 4 groups at immediate after operation and last follow-up when compared with preoperative value (P>0.05), and there was no significant difference between groups at immediate after operation and last follow-up (P>0.05).ConclusionApplication of transforaminal endoscope in the treatment of serious lumbar disc herniation has great clinical outcomes. The ITEA technology can obtain a wider field of view and be more convenient to find and remove the degenerative nucleus pulposus. However, the appropriate approach should be selected according to the symptoms and characteristics of lumbar disc herniation.