Objective To assess the effectiveness of the new anterolateral approach of the distal femur for the treatment of distal femoral fractures. Methods Between July 2007 and December 2009, 58 patients with distal femoral fractures were treated by new anterolateral approach of the distal femur in 28 patients (new approach group) and by conventional approach in 30 patients (conventional approach group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, cause of injury, affected side, type of fracture, disease duration, complication, or preoperative intervention (P gt; 0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency, hospitalization days, and Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score of knee were recorded. Results Operation was successfully completed in all patients of 2 groups, and healing of incision by first intention was obtained; no vascular and nerves injuries occurred. The operation time and intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency of new approach group were significantly less than those of conventional approach group (P lt; 0.05). But the intraoperative blood loss and the hospitalization days showed no significant difference between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). All patients were followed up 12-36 months (mean, 19.8 months). Bone union was shown on X-ray films; the fracture healing time was (12.62 ± 2.34) weeks in the new approach group and was (13.78 ± 1.94) weeks in the conventional approach group, showing no significant difference (t=2.78, P=0.10). The knee HSS score at last follow-up was 94.4 ± 4.2 in the new approach group, and was 89.2 ± 6.0 in the conventional approach group, showing significant difference between 2 groups (t=3.85, P=0.00). Conclusion New anterolateral approach of the distal femur for distal femoral fractures has the advantages of exposure plenitude, minimal tissue trauma, and early function rehabilitation training so as to enhance the function recovery of knee joint.
Objective To investigate the efficacy of double-plating fixation via U-shaped incision in the treatment of type C3.3 distal femoral fractures. Methods From July 2006 to February 2009, 11 cases of type C3.3 distal femoral fractures were treated, including 5 open fractures and 6 closed fractures. Among them, there were 7 males and 4 females with an averageage of 43 years (range, 27-55 years). The locations were left side in 6 cases and right side in 5 cases. Fracture was caused by traffic accident in 8 cases and fall ing from height in 3 cases. The time from injury to hospital ization was 30 minutes to 7 days. After bone traction for 3 to 8 days, the operations were performed by double-plating fixation via U-shaped incision, and autograft of il iac bone or allogeneic bone grafting. Results The average time of operation was 128 minutes (range, 105-150 minutes). The average blood loss during operation was 344 mL (range, 290-380 mL). Shallow local skin flap necrosis occurred in 2 cases, and incision healed by first intention in others patients. All patients were followed up 22 months on average (range, 12-36 months). The bone union was achieved within 3-6 months (4.4 months on average). No implant loosening or refracture was found. According to Merchan et al criteria for knee joint function evaluation, the results were excellent in 4 cases, good in 5 cases, fair in 1 case, and poor in 1 case at last follow-up; the excellent and good rate was 81.8%. Conclusion The double-plating fixation via U-shaped incision has the advantages of better exposure, great convenience to manipulation, anatomical reduction, and rigid fixation. It provides an effective treatment for type C3.3 distal femoral fracture. However, its operation indications and operating instructions should be strictly followed.
Objective To investigate the effect factors of knee function recovery after operation in distal femoral fractures. Methods From January 2001 to May 2007, 92 cases of distal femoral fracture were treated. There were 50 males and 42 females, aged 20-77 years old (average 46.7 years old). Fracture was caused by traffic accident in 48 cases, by fall ing fromheight in 26 cases, by bruise in 12 cases and by tumble in 6 cases. According to Müller’s Fracture classification, there were 29 cases of type A, 12 cases of type B and 51 cases of type C. According to American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, there were 21 cases of grade I, 39 cases of grade II, 24 cases of grade III, and 8 cases of grade IV. The time from injury to operation was 4 hours to 24 days with an average of 7 days. Anatomical plate was used in 43 cases, retrograde interlocking intramedullary nail in 37 cases, and bone screws, bolts and internal fixation with Kirschner pins in 12 cases. After operation, the HSS knee function score was used to evaluate efficacy. Ten related factors were appl ied for statistical analysis, to knee function recovery after operation in distal femoral fractures, such as age, sex, preoperative ASA classification, injury to surgery time, fracture type, treatment, reduction qual ity, functional exercise after operation, whether or not CPM functional training and postoperative compl ications. Results Wound healed by first intention in 88 cases, infection occurred in 4 cases. All patients followed up 16-32 months with an average of 23.1 months. Cl inical union of fracture was achieved within 3-7 months after operation. Extensor device adhesions and the scope of activities of lt; 80° occurred in 29 cases, traumatic arthritis in 25 cases, postoperative fracture displacement in 6 cases, mild knee varus or valgus in 7 cases and implant loosening in 6 cases. According to HSS knee function score, the results were excellent in 52 cases, good in 15 cases, fair in 10 cases and poor in 15 cases with an excellent andgood rate of 72.83%. Single factor analysis showed that age, preoperative ASA classification, fracture type, reduction qual ity, whether or not CPM functional exercise, and postoperative compl ications were significantly in knee function recovery (P lt; 0.05). logistic regression analysis showed that the fracture type, qual ity of reduction, whether or not CPM functional exercise, and age were major factors in the knee joint function recovery. Conclusion Age, preoperative ASA classification, fracture type, reduction qual ity, and whether or not CPM functional training, postoperative compl ications factors may affect the knee joint function recovery. Adjustment to the patient’s preoperative physical status, fractures anatomic reduction and firm fixation, early postoperative active and passive functional exercises, less postoperative compl ications can maximize the restoration of knee joint function.
Objective To assess the factors that affect the outcome of distal femoral fractures treated by retrograde intramedullary nail ing. Methods Between November 1999 and June 2006, 30 patients with 31 distal femoral fractures (15 males and 15 females, 1 bilateral) were treated by retrograde nail ing. Their ages ranged from 44 to 82 years old (average, 67.2 years old). The causes of injury were sl ipping downs in 17 patients, traffic accidents in 11, and fall ing from height in 2. Theaverage interval from injury to operation was 1.8 days. There were 14 cases of A1 fracture, 7 cases of A2, 8 cases of A3, and 2 cases of C1 according to AO/OTA classifications. The mean distance between the most distal l ine of the fracture and the intercondylar notch was 7.2 cm (range, 0-12 cm). Closed retrograde nail ing was done without reaming, and bone grafts were not done. Re sults The operation time averaged 76 minutes (range, 45-110 minutes). All patients were followed up for 19-69 months, and the mean follow-up duration was 27 months. Twenty-eight of 31 fractures united on the average of 14.7 weeks (range, 12-22 weeks). Compl ications occurred in 7 cases. There were 3 nonunions in AO-A3 fractures which were treated by changing implants or bone graft. Two patients suffered screw loosening of distal locking, that were re-fixed. Two patients showed l imited knee motion of less than 90 degrees flexion. There were no cases of deep infection, malunion over 10 degrees of angulation or 1 cm of shortening. A satisfactory outcome (excellent and good results) was achieved in 26 of 31 cases (84%), according to Schatzker and Lambert’s criteria. Poor results and compl ications were related to fractures of comminution and located within 5 cm from the intercondylar notch (Pearson Chi-square test, P=0.03). Other possible factors including age, kinds of nails used, associated injury, and numbers of distal locking screws were not related to the outcome and compl ication (Pearson Chi-square test, P gt; 0.05). Conclusion Retrograde nail ing may be a useful option for distal femoral fractures, but attention should be paid to comminuted fractures or fractures close to the knee joint.
Objective To explore the technique and clinicaleffects of internal fixation of complicated distal femoral fractures using the supporting steel of AO femoral condyles.Methods From October 2001 to February 2004, 23 cases of complicated distal femoral fractures were treated with open reduction and internal fixation using the supporting steel of AO femoral condyles. Of 23 cases, there were 19 males and 4 females, aged 27-55 years. The locations were the right side in 10 cases and the left side in 13 cases. Fracture caused by traffic accident in 16 and by fall in 7, including 14 closed fracture and 9 open fracture, 21 fresh fracture and 2 old fracture. Accordingto AO classification, 6 cases were classified as type A extra-articular fracture and 17 cases as type C intra-articular fracture. The X-ay films before operation showed comminuted fracture of femoral intercondyles and femoral supracondyles. All cases received scientific and rational rehabilitative treatment postoperatively. Results The postoperative follow-up ranged from 6months to 20 months, 23 cases achieved fracture healing with an average healing period of 10.3 months (from 7 months to 16 months). According to the criteria of Kolmert and Wulff, the results were excellent in 16 cases, good in 4 cases, fair in 2 case andpoor in 1 case. The excellenct and good rate was 86.9%.Conclusion Internal fixation with the supporting steel of AO femoral condyles for treatment of complicated distal femoral fractures has advantages of reasonable design, convenient operation, firm fixation and reliable clinical outcome .
ObjectiveTo investigate the effectiveness of anterior knee incision by the patellar longitudinal approach for osteotomy in treating type C fractures of the distal femur. MethodsBetween March 2010 and June 2014, 36 patients with type C fractures of the distal femur underwent fracture reduction and internal fixation by patellar longitudinal approach for osteotomy. There were 25 males and 11 females, aged 26-72 years (mean, 49 years). Injury causes included traffic accident injury (19 cases), falling injury from height (8 cases), and crushing injury (9 cases). There were 34 cases of closed fracture and 2 cases of open fracture. Associated fractures included 2 cases of patellar fracture and 4 cases of clavicular fracture; combined injuries included 4 cases of anterior cruciate ligament injury, 1 case of posterior cruciate ligament injury, 12 cases of meniscus injury, and 9 cases of medial and lateral collateral ligament injuries. It was 3-11 days from injury to operation (mean, 6 days). ResultsAmong 36 patients, 29 were followed up 12-24 months (mean, 18 months). Primary healing of incision was obtained, without infection or lower limb deep venous thrombosis. X-ray films showed fracture healing at 12-32 weeks (mean, 16.4 weeks). Neither loosening of screw and plate breakage nor valgus and varus knee occurred. Pain and stiff of the knee joint were observed in 4 and 2 cases, respectively; 4 cases walked with a cane. According to Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) scoring system, the results were excellent in 21 cases, good in 7 cases, and fair in 1 case; and the excellent and good rate was 96.55%. The internal fixation was removed at 10-14 months after operation, and there was no re-fracture. ConclusionThe patellar longitudinal approach has the advantages of sufficient exposure, easy reduction, short operation time, good internal fixation, less damage of soft tissue, and less complication. So it is the appropriate approach to treat type C fractures of the distal femur.
Objective To analyze the effectiveness of flexible internal fixation with locking plate for distal femoral fractures. Methods Between January 2015 and June 2016, 21 cases of distal femoral fractures were treated. There were 5 males and 16 females with an average age of 62 years (range, 32-88 years). Injury was caused by falling in 14 cases, by traffic accident in 5 cases, and by falling from height in 2 cases. The fractures located at the left side in 13 cases and the right side in 8 cases. Twenty cases were fresh closed fractures and 1 case was open fracture. According to AO/Association for the Study of Internal Fixation (AO/OTA) typing, there were 5 cases of type 33-A1, 3 of type 33-A2, 8 of type 33-A3, 2 of type 33-C2, and 3 of type 33-C3. The time from injury to operation was 3-13 days (mean, 6.5 days). Results All operation incisions healed primarily. Eighteen patients were followed up 12-24 months (mean, 16 months). All fractures healed, and the healing time was 8-24 weeks (mean, 16.6 weeks). The articular surface was smooth and the thigh length was recovered. No screw loosening, plate breakage, valgus or varus of the knee, stiff of the knee or non-unions occurred during follow-up. There was no significant difference in visual analogue scale (VAS) score between at 6 and 12 months after operation (P>0.05), and the difference was significant bewteen the other time points (P<0.05). There were significant differences in the range of motion of knee between 1 month and 3, 6, 12 months (P<0.05); there was no significant difference between 3, 6, and 12 months (P>0.05). There were significant differences in the Neer scores between 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after operation (P<0.05). According to Neer score criteria, the results were excellent in 12 cases and good in 6 cases at 12 months after operation. Conclusion Flexible internal fixation with locking plate for distal femoral fractures can get good functional recovery.
Objective To investigate current status and latest progress of clinical research on distal femoral fractures. Methods The related literature was extensively reviewed to summarize the trend of the researches and their clinical application in the treatment of distal femoral fractures. Results Distal femoral fractures are likely to occur in young people who suffer from high-energy damage and the elderly with osteoporosis, which is always comminuted and unstable fractures, and often involved in the articular surface and combined with serious soft tissue injury. Therefore, the treatment faces many challenges. External fixation is now used as a temporary means of controlling injury. The vast majority of patients are feasible to internal fixation, including plates system and intramedullary nail system. Different internal fixator also has its own characteristics, such as double plates can strengthen the medial support of the femur, less invasive stabilization system protects the blood supply of fractures, distal cortial locking plate is theoretically more fit for the requirements of bone healing, retrograde intramedullary nail can resist varus and valgus. Conclusion The treatment of distal femoral fractures should be based on the type of fracture and the characteristics of internal fixators.
ObjectiveTo explore the early effectiveness and advantages of mini-Swashbuckler approach in treatment of distal femoral type C fractures by comparing with Swashbuckler approach.MethodsA retrospective analysis was made on 43 patients with distal femoral type C fractures between January 2014 and June 2018. Twenty-two patients were treated with open reduction via mini-Swashbuckler approach and internal fixation with less invasive stabilization system (LISS) plate in modified group; and 21 patients were treated with open reduction via Swashbuckler approach and internal fixation with LISS plate in traditional group. There was no significant difference in age, gender, cause of trauma, fracture classification, fracture side, interval between injury and operation, and complications between the two groups (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative fluoroscopy times, hospitalization time, fracture healing time, Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) scores of the knee, and postoperative complications were recorded and compared between the two groups.ResultsThe operation successfully completed in both groups. The operation time of the modified group was significantly longer than that of the traditional group, the fluoroscopy times was increased and the blood loss was reduced, the differences were significant (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in hospitalization time between the two groups (t=0.277, P=0.783). All patients in the two groups were followed up 6-8 months, with an average of 7.2 months. Fractures healed in both groups, there was no significant difference in healing time between the two groups (t=0.861, P=0.394). The HSS scores of the modified group were 82.91±2.88 and 89.28±3.63 at 3 and 6 months after operation, respectively, which were superior to those of the traditional group (74.62±3.64) and (81.48±4.55) (t=8.306, P=0.000; t=6.231, P=0.000). There was 1 case of incision infection, 1 case of deep vein thrombosis, and 2 cases of knee flexion and extension dysfunction in traditional group, and 1 case of deep vein thrombosis, 1 case of varus deformity, and 1 case of internal fixation loosening in modified group. There was no significant difference in the incidences of complications between the two groups (P>0.05).ConclusionCompared with Swashbuckler approach, mini-Swashbuckler approach has limited visual field exposure, which leads to prolonged operation time and increased fluoroscopy times, but the risks of complications do not increase. Because of its small soft tissue injury and less blood loss, it is conducive to the recovery of knee joint function after operation.
ObjectiveTo explore the efficacy and advantages of the lower extremity axial distractor assisted closed reduction and retrograde intramedullary nail internal fixation in the treatment of distal femoral fractures.MethodsThe clinical data of 49 patients with distal femoral fractures treated with retrograde intramedullary nail internal fixation between April 2016 and December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the different methods of intraoperative reduction, the patients were divided into trial group (29 cases, using lower extremity axial distractor to assist closed reduction) and control group (20 cases, using free-hand retraction reduction). There was no significant difference in general information between the two groups (P>0.05), such as gender, age, side of injury, cause of injury, and fracture classification. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency, and callus formation time were recorded and compared between the two groups. The function of the affected limb was evaluated according to the Schatzker-Lambert standard at 1 year after operation.ResultsAll patients successfully completed the operation. In the control group, there was 1 case with open reduction and internal fixation, and the rest of the two groups were closed reduction. There was no significant difference in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency between the two groups (P>0.05). There was no complication such as vascular or nerve injury and iatrogenic fracture, etc. during and after operation, and the incisions healed by first intention. Except for 2 patients in the trial group who were lost to follow-up at 3 months after operation, the rest of the patients were followed up 12-36 months, with an average of 16.0 months. There was no significant difference in the callus formation time between the two groups (t=2.195, P=0.145). During the follow-up, postoperative knee joint stiffness occurred in 1 case in the control group, which improved by strengthening the knee joint function exercise and removing the internal fixator; the rest were not found to be associated with delayed or nonunion fractures, knee stiffness, and internal fixation complication. The function of the affected limb was evaluated according to the Schatzker-Lambert standard at 1 year after operation, the trial group achieved excellent results in 22 cases, good in 4 cases, and fair in 1 case, with an excellent and good rate of 96.3%; in the control group, the results were excellent in 16 cases, good in 3 cases, and fair in 1 case, with an excellent and good rate was 95.0%; showing no significant difference in the excellent and good rate between the two groups (χ2=0.451, P=0.502).ConclusionThe lower extremity axial distractor assisted closed reduction and retrograde intramedullary nailing for the treatment of distal femoral fractures is convenient, which has satisfactory efficacy.