Objective To review the progress in the diagnosis and treatment of distal tibiofibular syndesmosisinjury. Methods Different kinds of documents were widely collected, current developments of the diagnosis and treatmentof distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury were summarized. Results The disease history (damage mechanism), cl inicalexamination, and imaging examination (X-ray, CT scan, and MRI) can assist the diagnosis of distal tibiofibular syndesmosisinjury. Patients with unstable distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury needs active surgery treatment, and the princi ple isanatomical reduction and fixation so as to avoid the instabil ity of the ankle joint, long-term chronic pain, and traumaticarthritis. Conclusion The diagnosis of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury is still lack of specific quantitative parameters, socl inical study for large sample is needed to explicit the effectiveness.
ObjectiveTo investigate the biomechanical properties of artificial ligament in the treatment of injuries to distal tibiofibular syndesmosis so as to provide a scientific basis for clinical application. MethodsSixteen fresh ankle specimens were harvested from 8 normal fresh-frozen cadavers. The initial tests were performed on 16 intact specimens (group A) and then the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury models were made (group B); the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis was fixed with artificial ligament in 8 specimens (group C) and with cannulated lag screw in the other 8 specimens (group D). The pros and cons of different fixation methods were analyzed by displacement, stress shielding effect, the strength and stiffness of ankle joints, the contact area of tibiotalar articular surface and the contact stress. ResultsUnder the physiological loading or combined with external rotation moment, the displacement of group C was significantly lower than that of groups B and D (P < 0.05), but no significant difference was found between groups A and C (P > 0.05); and there were significant differences among groups A, B, and D (P < 0.05). The rates of stress shielding in the tibia and fibula of group C were significantly lower than those of group D (t=-71.288, P=0.000;t=-97.283, P=0.000). The stress strength in tibia of group C was significantly higher than that of groups A and D (P < 0.05), but no significant difference was found between groups A and D (P > 0.05). Group C had the highest stress strength in fibula, followed by group A, group D had the lowest; differences were significant among 3 groups (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in shear strength among groups A, C, and D (P > 0.05). The axial stiffness in tibia of group D was significantly lower than that of groups A and C (P < 0.05), but no significant difference was found between groups A and C (P > 0.05). The axial stiffness in fibula of group C was significantly higher than that of groups A and D (P < 0.05), but no significant difference was found between groups A and D (P > 0.05). Group C had the highest shear stiffness in tibia and fibula, followed by group D, group A had the lowest; differences were significant among 3 groups (P < 0.05). In groups A, C, and D, the contact area of tibiotalar articular surface gradually reduced, and the contact stress gradually increased, and differences were significant among 3 groups (P < 0.05). ConclusionFixation of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury with artificial ligament can better meet the physiological functions of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis and has lower stress shielding, better stress distribution. Hopefully, it can reduce the complications of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injuries and become a better treatment choice.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the difference between using and not using syndesmotic screw to treat pronation external rotation (PER) ankle fracture combined with separation of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. MethodsBetween April 2011 and October 2014, 46 cases of PER ankle fracture combined with separation of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis were treated, and syndesmotic screw was used in 24 cases (fixation group) and syndesmotic screw was not used in 22 cases (non-fixation group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, weight, cause of injury, side, injury to operation time, and fracture type between 2 groups (P > 0.05). The time for full weight-bearing, fracture healing time, and complications were recorded after operation. Anteroposterior and lateral X-ray films were taken to measure the tibiofibular overlap (TBOL) and tibiofibular clear space (TBCS). Baird-Jackson score was used to evaluate functional recovery of the ankle. ResultsAll incision healed by first intention without complications. The cases were followed up 13-18 months (mean, 15.2 months) in 2 groups. The time for full weight-bearing was 8-12 weeks (median, 11 weeks) in fixation group, which was significantly later than that in non-fixation group (range, 6-10 weeks; median, 8 weeks) (Z=-5.049, P=0.000). X-ray examination showed reduction of separation of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. All fractures healed. The fracture healing time was (13.83±1.37) weeks in fixation group, and was (13.91±1.31) weeks in non-fixation group, showing no significant difference (t=-0.191, P=0.945). No separation of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis, delayed union, nonunion, loosening, or breakage of fixation devices was observed in 2 groups. There was no significant difference in TBOL, TBCS, Baird-Jackson score and the excellent and good rate between 2 groups (P > 0.05). ConclusionIf the medial, lateral, and posterior structures of the ankle could be repaired according to injury, no significant influence on functional outcome of ankle or radiologic findings could be detected whether syndesmotic fixation is given or not in treating PER ankle fracture (exclude Maisonneuve fracture) combined with separation of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis.
Objective To investigate the rehabilitation treatment methods for distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury triad after the second surgery. Methods We reported the postsurgical rehabilitation treatment for a 16-year-old male who received second surgery for internal fixation screw rupture on August 20th 2014, due to weight bearing too early after his first surgery in March 2014 for distal tibiofibular syndesmosis diastasis combined with lateral malleolus fracture, ligamenta talofibulare anterius and deltoid ligament rupture. The patient was treated in the Rehabilitation Center of National Sports Training Center on September 25th, 2014. By analyzing the rehabilitation assessment results, a secondary ankle impingement syndrome was detected and following modified treatments were implemented. Results At the end of the first course of treatment, right ankle muscle strength, range of motion and Y balance tests were all weaker than the left. At the end of the second course of treatment, all data were better than the first course. At the end of the third course, all data were close to normal value except the right leg forward squat. Conclusions Through comprehensive rehabilitation, assessment feedback and further treatment improvement, complex cases like distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury triad after second injury can be well handled. However, more cases should be collected and investigated.
ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of flexible fixation and rigid fixation in the treatment of ankle pronation-external rotation fractures with distal tibiofibular syndesmosis.MethodsA retrospective analysis was made on the clinical data of 50 patients with ankle pronation-external rotation fractures and distal tibiofibular syndesmosis treated between January 2013 and December 2015. Suture-button fixation was used in 23 patients (flexible fixation group) and cortical screw fixation in 27 patients (rigid fixation group). There was no significant difference in age, gender, weight, side, fracture type, and time from trauma to surgery between 2 groups (P>0.05). The operation time, medial clear space (MCS), tibiofibular clear space (TFCS), tibiofibular overlap (TFO), American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, and Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI) score were compared between 2 groups.ResultsThe operation time was (83.0±9.1) minutes in the flexible fixation group and was (79.6±13.1) minutes in the rigid fixation group, showing no significant difference (t=1.052, P=0.265). All patients achieved healing of incision by first intention. The patients were followed up 12-20 months (mean, 14 months). The X-ray films showed good healing of fracture in 2 groups. There was no screw fracture, delayed union or nounion. The fracture healing time was (12.1±2.5) months in the flexible fixation group and was (11.3±3.2) months in the rigid fixation group, showing no significant difference between 2 groups (t=1.024, P=0.192). Reduction loss occurred after removal of screw in 2 cases of the rigid fixation group. At last follow-up, there was no significant difference in MCS, TFCS, TFO, AOFAS score and FADI score between 2 groups (P>0.05).ConclusionSuture-button fixation has similar effectiveness to screw fixation in ankle function and imaging findings, and flexible fixation has lower risk of reduction loss of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis than rigid fixation.
Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy between suture button plate and cortical screw in the treatment of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis seperation. Methods The clinical data and follow-up data 1 week and 2, 4, 6 weeks and 3, 6, 12 months after operation of patients with distal tibiofibular syndesmosis seperation combined with or without ankle fracture who were admitted to hospital from March 2011 to May 2014 were retrospectively collected. According to the fixation ways of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis, the patients were divided into the suture button plate group and the cortical screw group. The operation time, amount of blood loss, combined ankle fracture healing time, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores at the last follow-up and complications were compared between the two groups. Results A total of 52 patients were enrolled, including 28 cases of suture button plate group and 24 cases of cortical screw group. There were no significant difference in operation time or amount of blood loss between the two groups (P>0.05). All patients were followed up for 12–30 months averaged 14.5 months. All incisions healed by the first intention. The combined ankle fracture healing time in the suture button plate group was (11.2±2.0) weeks, while that was (11.0±2.1) weeks in the cortical screw group, with no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). In the suture button plate group, there was no loosening or rupture of internal fixation, while distal tibiofibular syndesmosis seperation was found again in one case 3 weeks after operation, and cured by reoperation at last. In the cortical screw group, rupture of screws was found in 2 cases, which occurred 9 and 11 weeks after operation respectively, and the broken screws were taken out when the fractures were healed and the internal fixation was removed; distal fibiofibular syndesmosis seperation was found again in one case 6 weeks after operation, and no treatment was given due to old age and low demand. At the last follow-up, the AOFAS score in the suture button plate group was 84.6±10.2, while the score in the cortical screw group was 83.7±12.5, with no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusions Suture button plate and cortical screw can effectively treat distal fibiofibular syndesmosis separation. The risk of suture button plate loosening or rupture is poor. Suture button plate fixation can meet the need of early functional exercises, and avoid the routine removal by reoperation.
ObjectiveTo review the research progress in the diagnosis and treatment of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury.MethodsThe recent literature about distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury was reviewed and analyzed.ResultsDistal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury is commonly seen in ankle joint injury, the anatomical complexities make diagnosis and treatment difficult. Preoperative physical examination, radiologic evaluation, and intraoperative stress-testing are important for the diagnosis. Aggressive treatment is also recommended for these injuries to prevent long-term chronic instability. Internal fixation is the main treatment, including metal screw, degradable screw, elastic fixation, and hybrid techniques. Metal screw fixation is still the current mainstream, but elastic fixation represented by Suture-button is more in line with the physiological characteristics of ankle joint, and the rate of secondary operation is low while the clinical outcome is satisfactory. The application prospect of elastic fixation is worthy of expectation.ConclusionIt’s crucial for patient with ankle fracture to repair the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury. How to diagnose the injury more accurately and simply, how to increase the success rate of reduction, and how to reduce the complications of surgery are still worthy for further exploration.