Does-response meta-analysis, which has being developed for more than 30 years, is a type of regression function and can be both linear and non-linear model. It plays an important role in investigating the relationship between dependent and independent variable. With its special advantages, dose-response meta-analysis has been widely used in evidence-based practice and decision. Currently there are several models can be used to perform dose-response metaanalysis with various advantages and disadvantages. It is vital to choose best model to perform dose-response metaanalysis in evidence-based practice. In this paper, we briefly introduce and summarize the methodology of dose-response meta-analysis.
Restricted cubic spline function is an ideal model in trend approximation, which is widely used in doseresponse meta-analysis. The spline function, based on parameter technique, is a smoothly joined piecewise polynomial of each knot, with a cubic polynomial in each sub-interval of the slope which fits well in the non-linear trend by changing the number and (or) the sites of the knots. We have introduced the methodology of linear and non-linear slope model in dose-response meta-analysis in the previous article, and in this one, we will give a more detailed discussion on restricted cubic spline function mainly in the following aspects: model building, parameters pooling and knots selecting.
Dose-response meta-analysis, an important tool in investigating the relationship between a certain exposure and risk of disease, has been increasingly applied. Traditionally, the dose-response meta-analysis was only modelled as linearity. However, since the proposal of more powerful function models, which contains both linear, quadratic, cubic or more higher order term within the regression model, the non-linearity model of dose-response relationship is also available. The packages suit for R are available now. In this article, we introduced how to conduct a dose-response meta-analysis using dosresmeta and mvmeta packages in R.
When investing the relationship between independent and dependent variables in dose-response meta-analysis, the common method is to fit a regression function. A well-established model should take both linear and non-linear relationship into consideration. Traditional linear dose-response meta-analysis model showed poor applicability since it was based on simple linear function. We introduced a piecewise linear function into dose-response meta-analysis model which overcame this problem. In this paper, we will give a detailed discussion on traditional linear and piecewise linear regression model in dose-response meta-analysis.
According to the heterogeneity between dose-response data across different studies and the potential nonlinear trend within the dose-response relationship, there are several models for trend estimation from summarized dose-response data, with applications to meta-analysis. However, up to now, there is no guideline of conducting a metaanalysis of dose-response data. After summarizing the previous papers, this paper focuses on how to select the right model for conducting a meta-analysis of dose-response data based on the heterogeneity across different studies, the goodness of fit, and the P value of overall association between exposure and event. Then a preliminary statistical process of conducting a meta-analysis of dose-response data is proposed.
Dose-response meta-analysis, as a subset of meta-analysis, plays an important role in dealing with the relationship between exposure level and risk of diseases. Traditional models limited in linear regression between the independent variables and the dependent variable. With the development of methodology and functional model, Nonlinear regression method was applied to dose-response meta-analysis, such as restricted cubic spline regression, quadratic B-spline regression. However, in these methods, the term and order of the independent variables have been assigned that may not suit for any trend distribution and it may lead to over fitting. Flexible fraction polynomial regression is a good method to solve this problem, which modelling a flexible fraction polynomial and choosing the best fitting model by using the likelihood-ratio test for a more accurate evaluation. In this article, we will discuss how to conduct a dose-response meta-analysis by flexible fraction polynomial.
Dose-response relationship model has been widely used in epidemiology studies, as well as in evidence-based medicine area. In dose-response meta-analysis, the results are highly depended on the raw data. However, many primary studies did not provide sufficient data and led the difficulties in data analysis. The efficiency and response rate of collecting the raw data from original authors were always low, thus, evaluating and transforming the missing data is very important. In this paper, we summarized several types of missing data, and introduced how to estimate the missing data and transform the effect measure using the existed information.
As a valid method in systematic review, dose-response meta-analysis is widely used in investigating the relationship between independent variable and dependent variable, and which usually based on observational studies. With large sample size, observational studies can provide a reasonable amount of statistical power for meta-analysis. However, due to the design defects of observational studies, they tend to introduce many kinds of biases, which may influence the final results that make them deviation from the truth. Given the dead zone of methodology, there is no any bias adjusting method in dose-response meta-analysis. In this article, we will introduce some bias adjusting methods from other observational-study-based meta-analysis and make them suit for dose-response meta-analysis, and then compare the advantages and disadvantages of these methods.
In evidence-based practice and decision, dose-response meta-analysis has been concerned by many scholars. It can provide unique dose-response relationship between exposure and disease, with a high grade of evidence among observational-study based meta-analysis. Thus, it is important to clearly understand this type of meta-analysis on software implementations. Currently, there are different software for dose-response meta-analysis with various characteristics. In this paper, we will focus on how to conduct dose-response meta-analysis by Stata, R and SAS software, which including a brief introduction, the process of calculation, the graph drawing, the generalization, and some examples of the processes.
ObjectiveTo develop reporting guideline for dose-response meta-analysis (DMA), so as to help Chinese authors to understand DMA better and to promote the reporting quality of DMA conducted by them. MethodPubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, and WanFang Data were searched from Jan 1st 2011 to Dec 30th 2015 to collect DMA papers published by Chinese authors. The number of these publications by years, whether and what kind of reporting guideline was used, and whether the DMA method claimed in these publications was correct were analysed. Then we drafted a checklist of items for reporting DMA, and organized a discussion meeting with experts from the fields of DMA, evidence-based medicine, clinical epidemiology, and clinicians to collect suggestions for revising the draft reporting guideline for DMA. ResultsOnly 33.73% of the publications clarified it is a DMA on the title and 48.02% of them reported risk of bias. Almost 38.49% of the publications didn't use any reporting guidelines. Fourteen of them claimed an incorrect use of methodology. We primarily took account for 47 potential items related to DMA based on our literature analysis results and existing reporting guidelines for other types of meta-analyses. After the discussion meeting with 6 experts, we revised the items, and finally the G-Dose checklist with 43 items for reporting DMA was developed. ConclusionThere is a lack of attention on reporting guidelines in Chinese authors and evidence suggests these authors may be at risk of incomplete understanding on reporting guidelines. It is strongly recommended to use reporting guidelines for DMA and other types of meta-analyses in Chinese authors.