Objective To compare the effectiveness between arthroscopic double-bundle and single-bundle anterior cruciate l igament (ACL) reconstruction with deep-frozen allografts. Methods Between January 2008 and January 2009, 105 patients undergoing arthroscopic ACL reconstruction with deep-frozen allografts were selected and randomly divided intosingle-bundle (n=59) or double-bundle (n=46) groups. Patients were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively 6, 12, and 24 months. Of the patients, 93 (51 in the single-bundle group and 42 in the double-bundle group) were available for full evaluation. There was no significant difference in gender, age, height, weight, disease duration, compl ication, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, and Lysholm score between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). The anterior drawer test and the Lachman test for all were rated as + in 2 groups, and the pivot shift test were rated as ++ before operation. Results All wounds healed by first intention, and no related compl ication such as fracture, infection, or deep venous thrombosis was observed. There was no significant difference in the IKDC score, Lysholm score, anterior drawer test, pivot shift test, and Lachman test between 2 groups at 6-month and 12-month follow-up (P gt; 0.05). The IKDC score, Lysholm score, pivot shift test, Lachman test, and the side-to-side difference measured by KT-1000 arthrometer in the double-bundle group were significantly better than those in single-bundle group at 24-month follow-up (P lt; 0.05). Conclusion The double-bundle ACL reconstruction with deep-frozen allografts has better effectiveness than the single-bundle ACL reconstruction.
Objective To study the method and cl inical results of arthroscopic double-bundle posterior cruciate l igament (PCL) reconstruction using achilles tendon allograft. Methods From September 2005 to September 2006, 17 patients with PCL injuries of grade III received arthroscopic double-bundle PCL reconstruction using achilles tendon allograft. There were 12 males and 5 females with an average age of 31.7 years (range, 19-48 years), including 10 cases of left PCL injuries and 7 cases of right PCL injuries. Injury was caused by sports in 6 cases and traffic accident in 11 cases. The average time from injury to surgery was 16 days (range, 7-30 days). The preoperative knee flexion was (121.8 ± 4.1)°. The posterior drawer test was positive and the varus angulation test was negative in all 17 patients. Lysholm score was 50.8 ± 6.1 and Tegner score was 1.3 ± 0.7. The side-to-side difference was (10.5 ± 1.6) mm by KT-1000 arthrometer. Results The hospital ization were (13.6 ± 2.4) days. The operation time was (67.8 ± 9.4) minutes. The time was (5.4 ± 1.2) days when the body temperature was higher than 37.4 ℃ after operation. All incisions healed by first intention. No compl ication occurred. All 17 patients were followed up 25 months on average (range, 18-30 months). The knee flexion was (116.9 ± 3.1)° at the final follow-up, showing no significant difference when compared with that of preoperation (P gt; 0.05). The posterior drawer test and the varus angulation test were negative in all 17 patients. Lysholm score and Tegner score were 91.6 ± 3.2 and 6.0 ± 0.7, respectively, and the side-to-side difference was (2.7 ± 1.7) mm, showing significant differences when compared with those of preoperation (P lt; 0.05).Conclusion Achilles tendon allograft is fit for PCL reconstruction. Arthroscopic double-bundle posterior cruciate l igament reconstruction using achilles tendon allograft can reconstruct both anterolateral and posteromedial bundles of the PCL. The knee joint function can be restored effectively. The short-term outcome has been proved, but the long-term outcome needs more observations
Objective To evaluate the primary cl inical results of double-bundle anterior cruciate l igament reconstruction (ACLR) with semitendinosus allografts. Methods From March 2006 to October 2006, 33 patients underwent double-bundle ACLR with semitendinosus allografts. The complete followed-up data of 31 patients was analyzed retrospectively. There were 24 males and 7 females aged 18-35 years old (average 25 years old). The injury was caused by sports accidents in 23cases and traffic accidents in 8 cases, involving the left knee in 18 cases and the right knee in 13 cases. Anterior cruciate l igament rupture were confirmed by MRI and arthroscopy in all the patients, without lateral collateral l igaments injuries and posterior cruciate l igament injuries. The time from injury to operation was 1-43 months (average 11 months). The knee was fixed at 0° position after operation for 2 weeks and got knee joint rehabil itation exercises gradually. Results The incision of 2 patients showed effusion 4 and 7 days after operation, respectively, and healed after symptomatic treatment. The incision of 29 patients healed by first intention. There were no compl ications such as stiffness of knee joint, neurovascular injuries and joint infections. All the patients were followed up for 24-29 months (average 26 months). MRI displayed the anterior cruciate l igament grafts presented with good connection and signal similar to the normal 2 years after operation. There was significant difference between the preoperational value and the final follow-up value in terms of bilateral knee joint difference of prior laxity, Lachman test, and pivot shift test (P lt; 0.05 ). The circumference difference between the injured and the normal was (11.6 ± 7.9) mm before operation and (5.0 ± 3.1) mm at the final follow-up (P lt; 0.05). The Tegner score, Lysholm score, and International Knee Documentation Committee score was 3.83 ± 1.15, 64.38 ± 6.81, and 41.42 ± 6.30, respectively, before operation, and 6.29 ± 0.64, 94.45 ± 3.03, and 95.72 ± 3.10, respectively, at the final follow-up. There was a significant difference between before and after operation (P lt; 0.05). Conclusion The primary cl inical results of double-bundle ACLR with semitendinosus allografts are satisfactory and the allogeneic semitendinosus are good grafts for double-bundle ACLR.
Objective To evaluate knee stability after double-bundle and single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Methods Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-randomized controlled trials (quasi-RCTs) were collected from MEDLINE (1966 to October 2007), OVID (1950 to October 2007), The Cochrane Library (issue 4, 2007) and China Academic Journals Full-text Database (1979 to October 2007). The quality of included trials was assessed. Data analyses were performed with The Cochrane Collaboration’s RevMan 4.2.10 software. Results One RCT (quality B) and 5 quasi-RCTs (quality C) involving 426 patients met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analyses showed significant differences between the two operative procedures in terms of anterior stability (WMD –0.75, 95%CI –1.14 to –0.37, P=0.000 1) and rotational stability [RR 1.38, 95%CI 1.17 to 1.61, Plt;0.000 1]. Conclusion The double-bundle anterior cruciate liagament is superior to single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament in terms of anterior stability and rotational stability. Since the included trials were small and of poor quality, more high-quality, large-scale randomized controlled trials are required.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the effectiveness of double-bundle versus single-bundle for arthroscopic transtibial reconstruction of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL). MethodsWe searched PubMed, The Cochrane Library, EMbase, VIP and WanFang Data to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of PCL reconstruction treated with double-bundle versus single-bundle arthroscopic transtibial technique. Two reviewers screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data and assessed the methodological quality of included studies, and then meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software. ResultsA total of 4 RCTs involving 186 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that double-bundle was superior to single-bundle in Lysholm score (MD=2.17, 95%CI 0.29 to 4.05, P=0.02), Tegner score (MD=0.62, 95%CI 0.09 to 1.16, P=0.02), IKDC objective score (A:RR=1.57, 95%CI 1.09 to 2.26, P=0.02; A+B:RR=1.15, 95%CI 1.01 to 1.32, P=0.04). However, there was no significant difference in the KT-1000 posterior between both groups (MD=-0.65, 95%CI -3.29 to 1.99, P=0.63). ConclusionThe current evidence shows that the double bundle arthroscopic transtibial is superior to the single bundle PCL reconstruction. Due to the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies with large sample-size are needed to validate the conclusion.