Objective To investigate the methods and effectiveness of ear reconstruction for the microtia patients with craniofacial deformities. Methods Between July 2000 and July 2010, ear reconstruction was performed with tissue expander and autogenous costal cartilages in 1 300 microtia patients with degree II+ hemifacial microsoma, and the clinical data were reviewed and analyzed. There were 722 males and 578 females, aged 5 years and 8 months to 33 years and 5 months (median, 12 years and 2 months). The expander was implanted into the retroauricular region in stage I; ear reconstruction was performed after 3-4 weeks of expansion in stage II; and reconstructed ear reshaping was carried out at 6 months to 1 year after stage II in 1 198 patients. Results Of 1 300 patients, delayed healing occurred in 28 cases after stage II, healing by first intention was obtained in the other 1 272 cases, whose new ears had good position and appearance at 1 month after stage II. After operation, 200 cases were followed up 1-9 years (mean, 3 years). One case had helix loss because of trauma, and 1 case had the new ear loss because of fistula infection. At last follow-up, the effectiveness were excellent in 110 cases, good in 65 cases, and fair in 23 cases with an excellent and good rate of 88.4%. Conclusion It is difficulty in ear reconstruction that the reconstructed ear is symmetrical to the contralateral one in the microtia patients with degree II+ hemifacial microsoma. The key includes the location of new ear, the fabrication of framework, and the utilization of remnant ear.
【Abstract】 Objective To summarize different treatments of the residual ear in auricular reconstruction, toinvestigate the reasonable appl ications of the residual ear. Methods From September 2005 to July 2006, 128 patients（79 males, 49 females; aging 5-21 years with an average of 11 years）with unilateral microtia underwent the staged repair. In the patients, there were 44 cases of left-unilaterally microtia and 84 cases of right-unilaterally microtia. The residual ears looked l ike peanut in 56 patients, l ike sausage in 35 patients, l ike boat in 27 patients, and l ike shells in 10 patients. Among all the patients, the external acoustic meatus was normal in 5 patients, stenosis in 11 patients, and atresia in 112 patients. According to auricular developmental condition, the patients were divided into three types: 17 cases of type I, 98 cases of type II, and 13 cases of type III. In the first stage operation, a 50 mL kidney-l iked expander was implanted into post aurem subcutaneous tissue. The residualear whose superior extremity was close to the hair l ine was treated. The middle and superior part of the residual ear was cut. The redundant residual auricular cartilage was removed. In the second stage operation, the inferior part of the cartilage frame was covered by the middle and superior part of the residual ear. According to the location of the residual ear, “V-Y” plasty, “Z”-plasty and reversal of the residual ear were used to correct the location of the residual ear. In the third stage operation, the remained residual ear was used to reconstruct crus of hel ix or cover the wound surface which was resulted from repairing the reconstructed ear. Results The residual ears which were reshaped and transferred had good blood circulation. All residual ears were survival. The wounds healed by first intention. The follow-up for 8-15 months showed that the auricular lobule of the reconstructed ear was turgor vital is and natural. The locations of the reconstructed ear and normal side ear were symmetry. The auricular lobules of the reconstructed ear survived well. The reconstructed crus of hel ix, hel ix, antihel ix and triangular fossawere clear. The results were satisfactory. Conclusion Using residual ear reasonably is an important procedure of successful auricular reconstruction and the symmetry of the reconstructed ear and uninjured side ear.