Objective To discuss the feasibility and safety of early oral feeding after colorectal cancer resection and early postoperative recovery condition.Methods Between January 2008 and June 2008, 128 patients diagnosed definitely as colorectal cancer were analyzed retrospectively. Fifty-six cases were treated with early oral feeding (EOF group), and 72 cases were treated with traditional feeding (TF group). The length of postoperative hospital stay, time of first flatus and defecation, and incidences of gastric retention, ileus, severe diarrhea, anastomotic leakage, wound infection, and pulmonary infection were studied and compared. Results The postoperative hospital stay, time of first flatus and defecation in EOF group were apparently shorter than those in TF group (Plt;0.05). As to the incidence of postoperative complications, EOF group had a higher incidence of gastric retention (Plt;0.05), while the differences of incidences of ileus, severe diarrhea, anastomotic leakage, wound infection, and pulmonary infection were not statistically significant between the two groups (Pgt;0.05). Early oral feeding can be tolerated by as much as 89.29% (50/56) patients. Conclusion Early oral feeding after colorectal cancer resection is safe and feasible, and can promote early rehabilitation of patients.
Objective To explore the feasibility and safety of early feeding after arthroscopic surgery with general anesthesia. Methods One hundred patients undergoing arthroscopic surgery with general anesthesia between January and December 2017 were randomly divided into the routine feeding group and the early feeding group, with 50 cases in each group. In the routine feeding group, patients were feeding after anus gas passage or 6 hours after surgery. Under full assessment, patients in the early feeding group could drink or eat when recovered from anesthesia. The nausea, vomiting, abdominal distension, and thirst incidences and the comfort degree 6 hours after surgery, the time of first stand up on foot, and the length of hospital stay between the two groups were compared. Results There was no statistical difference (P>0.05) in the incidence of disgusting (10.0%vs. 22.0%), vomiting (6.0% vs. 16.0%), abdominal distention (4.0% vs. 12.0%) or length of hospital stay [(6.44±2.28) vs. (6.34±0.94) days]. The difference in the incidence of postoperative thirst (14.0% vs. 40.0%), the comfort degree 6 hours after surgery (2.36±1.21 vs. 4.14±1.53), the time of the first stand up on foot [(17.30±10.32) vs. (20.84±3.92) hours] were statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusions Early feeding is safe and feasible for the postoperiative arthroscopic surgery after general anesthesia, and can improve the patients’ comfort degree.