Objective To observe the midterm haemodynamic manifestation of the home made C-L pugestrut tilting disc mechanical valve in aortic valve replacement, and to evaluate its function. Methods Twenty patients underwent aortic valve replacement over 5 years were collected and divided into two groups, the C-L pugestrut group （n=10）：aortic valve was replaced by home-made C-L pugestrut tilting disc mechanical valve（21mm）; Medtronic-Hall group （n=10）：aortic valve was replaced by Medtronic-Hall mechanical valve （21mm）. The peak transprosthetic gradients （△P）, mean transprosthetic gradients （△Pm）and effective orifice area（EOA） at rest were compared between two groups. Results At rest, △P of the C-L pugestrut group and Medtronic-Hall group were 11.63±3.23mmHg vs. 9. 78±3. 35mmHg; △Pm of the C-L pugestrut group and Medtronic-Hall group were 6. 25±2. 32 mmHg vs. 5.85±2.32mmHg： EOA of the C-L pugestrut group and Medtronic-Hall group were 1.07±0.17 cm2 vs. 1.25±0.27 cm2. There was no statistically significance in △P, △Pm and EOA between two groups（P〉0.05）. Conclusions The midterm haemodynamic results of the home-made C-L pugestrut tilting disc mechanical valve show that it has comparable haemodynamic results to those of Medtronic-Hall mechanical valve ,and it has well-done function. The home-made C-L pugestrut valve is one of the reliable mechanical heart valves.
ObjectiveTo discuss the influence of early postoperative hemodynamic, postoperative mortality and the incidence of adverse cardiovascular events with the phenomenon of prosthesis-patient mismatch. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 89 patients who had simple aortic valve replacement in our hospital bewteen January 2012 and January 2014. The 89 patients were divided into two groups including a match group (16 females and 48 males with average age of 58.1±10.4 years) and a mismatch group (15 females and 10 males with average age of 65.3±12.8 years). We compared early results between the two groups. ResultsThere is a statistic difference (P < 0.05) in aortic flow velocity, mean pressure gradient, and the maximum pressure gradient between the two groups. The survival rate of the match group is significantly lower than that of the mismatch group (P < 0.05). And there is a statistical difference in adverse cardiovascular event-free incidence between the two groups (P < 0.001). ConclusionThe phenomenon of prosthesis-patient mismatch can affect postoperative hemodynamic and lead to heart failure after surgery. And early mortality and the incidence of cardiovascular adverse events in patients are increased due to prosthesis-patient mismatch.