Objective To compare the effects of rivaroxaban and enoxaparin on hidden blood loss after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods A retrospective analysis was made on the clinical data of 76 patients (93 hips) with avascular necrosis of the femoral head who underwent primary THA between June 2009 and January 2012. After operation, 10 mg rivaroxaban was used at 6-10 hours for 14 days in 44 cases (54 hips) (rivaroxaban group) and 4 000 U enoxaparin at 12 hours for 14 days in 32 cases (39 hips) (enoxaparin group). There was no significant difference in age, gender, weight, height, disease duration, grade of avascular necrosis of the femoral head, and lesion hips between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). The total blood loss, dominant blood loss, hidden blood loss, and percentage of hidden blood loss were calculated according to the formula. The bleeding events were recorded within 35 days after operation. Results The total blood loss was (1 509.56 ± 325.23) mL; the dominant blood loss was (928.09 ± 210.50) mL; the hidden blood loss was (581.47 ± 215.01) mL; and the percentage of hidden blood loss was 37.88% ± 10.42% in the rivaroxaban group. The total blood loss was (1 521.38 ± 516.49) mL; the dominant blood loss was (917.50 ± 378.73) mL, the hidden blood loss was (603.88 ± 377.15) mL, and the percentage of hidden blood loss was 38.18% ± 18.33% in the enoxaparin group. There was no significant difference in the above indicators between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). The incidence of bleeding event was 9.1% (4/44) in the rivaroxaban group and was 3.1% (1/32) in the enoxaparin group, showing no significant difference (χ2=1.073, P=0.390). Conclusion There is no significant difference in the risk of hidden blood loss and incidence of bleeding event for primary THA between the rivaroxaban and the enoxaparin use.
Objective To systematically assess the therapeutic effect of rivaroxaban and enoxaparin on preventing deep venous thrombosis after major orthopedic operation. Methods Such databases as MEDLINE, EMbase, The Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2009), Current Controlled Trials, The National Research Register, CBM, and CNKI were searched from their establishment to December 2009 in whatever language. Related journals were handsearched as well. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of comparing therapeutic effects of rivaroxaban and enoxaparin on preventing deep venous thrombosis after major orthopedic operation were included. Data were extracted and their quality was evaluated, and meta-analyses were conducted by using RevMan 5.0.25 software. Results Seven RCTs with 15 458 patients were included. The results of meta-analyses showed that compared with enoxaparin, rivaroxaban reduced the end risk of the primary efficacy to 60% (RR=0.40, 95%CI 0.28 to 0.57, Plt;0.000 01) and reduced the end risk of the main secondary efficacy to 71% (RR=0.29, 95%CI 0.15 to 0.56, Plt;0.000 01), and the end risk of other efficacy to 56% (RR=0.44, 95%CI 0.29 to 0.66, Plt;0.000 01). During the treatment, rivaroxaban and enoxaparin displayed similarity in terms of the incidence of serious bleeding events (RR=1.16, 95%CI 0.68 to 1.999, P=0.59) and the secondary safety endpoint. Conclusion Rivaroxaban is effective in preventing deep venous thrombosis after major orthopedic operation and can significantly reduce the risk of postoperative deep vein thrombosis.
ObjectiveTo compare the effect on blood loss after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) between rivaroxaban and enoxaparin. MethodsA retrospective analysis was made on the clinical data of 107 patients (121 knees) with osteoarthritis undergoing primary TKA between January 2010 and October 2012. According to different perioperative anticoagulants, the patients were divided into the rivaroxaban group (51 cases, 57 knees) and the enoxaparin group (56 cases, 64 knees). There was no significant difference in gender, age, height, weight, body mass index, osteoarthritis classification, and disease duration between 2 groups (P>0.05). The total blood loss, hidden blood loss, dominant blood loss, and the percentage of hidden blood loss were compared between 2 groups. The bleeding events were recorded within 35 days after operation. ResultsThe dominant blood loss of enoxaparin group was significantly higher than that of rivaroxaban group (t=3.025, P=0.003), but the percentage of hidden blood loss of enoxaparin group was significantly lower than that of rivaroxaban group (t=4.361, P=0.000); no significant difference was found in the total blood loss and hidden blood loss between 2 groups (P>0.05). The incidence of bleeding event in rivaroxaban group (15.69%; including 1 case of incision bleeding, 4 cases of melena, and 3 cases of haematuria) was significantly higher than that in enoxaparin group (3.57%; including 1 case of haematuria and 1 case of melena) (χ2=4.624, P=0.032). ConclusionRivaroxaban does not increase the risk of hidden blood loss for TKA when compared with enoxaparin, but enoxaparin can increase the risk of dominant blood.
ObjectiveTo compare the cost-effectiveness of warfarin and enoxaparin overlapping treatment for the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) or pulmonary embolism (PE) in patients with nephrotic syndrome (NS). MethodsA decision tree model was constructed. The efficacy data applied in our decision tree were from clinical data, and the cost data was based on the hospitalization cost of 103 patients with nephrotic syndrome in Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital from 2013 to 2014, State Development and Reform Commission pricing and literature report. The one-way sensitivity analyses was conducted to analyze the stability of test. ResultsIn base case, the cost and cost-effective ratio of warfarin and enoxaparin overlapped treatment for 3 days were 10305.49 yuan and 31607.15, respectively. While those overlapped treatment for 4 days were 8849.36 yuan and 20896.46, overlapped treatment for 5 days and above were 9494.29 yuan and 21659.95, respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 4 days versus 5 days and above was 5600.96. The cost-effective ratio of 4 days was lower but the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of it was higher. The sensitivity analysis showed the test result was stable. ConclusionCost-effectiveness analysis shows that warfarin and enoxaparin overlapping treatment for 4 days in patients with nephrotic syndrome has cost-effective advantage. Due to the limited sample size of our study, the above conclusion should be proved by more large-scale high-quality clinical studies.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants (Apixaban, Rivaroxaban, or Dabigatran) after joint replacement.MethodsCNKI, WanFang Data, VIP, CBM, PubMed, EMbase and The Cochrane Library databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on new oral anticoagulants after joint replacement from inception to October, 2019. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed risk of bias of included studies, and then meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 13 RCTs were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that compared to Enoxaparin, the new oral anticoagulant significantly reduced the incidence of asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (RR=0.60, 95%CI 0.46 to 0.78, P<0.000 1) and symptomatic DVT (RR=0.40, 95%CI 0.28 to 0.58, P<0.000 1), while the incidence of symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE) during treatment (RR=0.91, 95%CI 0.59 to 1.39, P=0.65) and mortality (RR=1.00, 95%CI 0.40 to 1.76, P=0.99) were not reduced. Major bleeding (RR=1.05, 95%CI 0.81 to 1.35, P=0.72) and clinically relevant non-major bleeding events (RR=0.99, 95%CI 0.73 to 1.33, P=0.94) with new oral anticoagulants were not statistically different from Enoxaparin.ConclusionsCurrent evidence shows that new oral anticoagulants can effectively reduce the incidence of DVT in patients after joint replacement without increasing the risk of adverse events such as bleeding. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are required to verify the above conclusions.