west china medical publishers
Keyword
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Keyword "Epworth sleepiness scale" 2 results
  • Meta-analysis of continuous positive airway pressure for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome patients in subjective outcomes of sleepiness behavior and mood status

    Objective To evaluate the subjective outcomes of sleepiness behavior and mood status applying continuous positive airway pressure(CPAP) in adults of elderly and middle-aged with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome(OSAS). Methods Nine randomized controlled trails comparing nocturnal CPAP with inactive control appliances in adults with OSAS with the use of computerized search in related medical databases(MEDLINE,EMBASE,CBMdisk,etc) were included.The quality of literature was reviewed,and all data were extracted by two reviewers independently.Meta analysis was conducted used RevMan 4.2 software.Results 9 RCT involving 665 patients of elderly and middle-aged met the inclusion criteria.Meta analysis indicated that the score of Epworth sleepiness scale(ESS) and general health questionnaire-28(GHQ-28) declined significantly after CPAP treatment on effectiveness with WMD(random) -2.94,95 %CI -4.68 to -1.20,or WMD(fixed) -2.26,95 %CI -3.79 to -0.72,Plt;0.01.Nevertheless,hospital anxiety and depression scale(HADS) was not significantly different between CPAP and control with WMD(random) -0.89,95%CI -1.98 to 0.20,Pgt;0.05.Conclusion Current clinical evidence suggested that CPAP was effective in improving day-time subjective outcomes of sleepiness behavior and general mental health status in OSAS patients of elderly and middle-aged,although evidence of improving emotion disorder of anxiety and depression was not confirmed.

    Release date:2016-09-14 11:57 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Application Value of Epworth Sleepiness Scale in the Screening of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Hypopnea Syndrome

    Objective To evaluate the value of Epworth sleepiness scale ( ESS) in evaluating the severity of obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome ( OSAHS) . Methods A total of 340 cases with suspected OSAHS were enrolled. The ESS scores and polysomnography ( PSG) monitoring data were analyzed. According to the PSG monitoring results the patients were classified into non-OSAHS, mild, moderate and severe OSAHS groups. The average ESS scores and the ratio of patients whose ESS score was ≥9 were compared among the four groups. The diagnostic value of ESS score was evaluated by ROC curve. The correlation of ESS scores with age, apnea hypopnea index ( AHI) , the lowest SpO2( LSpO2 ) and microarousal index was analyzed. Results The ESS scores had an ascending tendency as the severity of OSAHS was increased but only in the severe OSAHS cases the difference was significant statistically compared with the other three groups ( P lt; 0. 05) . The mean ESS scores in the four groups were 9. 96 ± 4. 81,10. 21 ±5. 48, 11. 48 ±5. 28 and 13. 52 ±5. 84, respectively. There was no statistical significance while comparing the ratio of patients whose ESS scores were ≥9 among the four groups. The analysis of ROC curve showed the area under the ROC curve ( AUC) was lesser( 0. 601) and a best cutoff could not be obtained. When ESS score ≥9 was made as the cutoff in screening OSAHS patients the sensitivity was 70. 0% and the misdiagnosis rate was 63. 21% . The ESS scores had positive correlation with the apnea hypopnea index ( AHI)( r =0. 240, P lt; 0. 01) and negative correlation with LSpO2 ( r = - 0. 198, P lt;0. 01) . The ESSscores had no correlation with age or the microarousal index ( P gt; 0. 05) . Conclusions The ESS score has some significance in screening severe OSAHS patients but can not exactly reflect the severity of OSAHS patients among Chinese population, suggesting ESS score has limited value in the evaluation of OSAHS severity. The ESS score ≥9 as a cutoff is not a reliable parameter to estimate the severity of OSAHS. A more effective scoring system need to be established for better screening of OSAHS patients.

    Release date:2016-09-14 11:24 Export PDF Favorites Scan
1 pages Previous 1 Next

Format

Content