Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of Etanercept for Ankylosing spondylitis. Methods We searched The Cochrane Library (Issue 4. 2008), MEDLINE (1966 to September 2008), EMBASE (1974 to September 2008), CBM (1978 to 2008), CNKI (1994 to 2008), VIP (1989 to 2008), and Wanfang (1999 to 2008). The quality of included studies was critically evaluated. Data analyses were performed with The Cochrane Collaboration’s RevMan 5.0 software. Results Seven randomized controlled trials with total of 949 patients met the included criteria. The metaanalysis showed the effective rate of ASAS 20 or ASAS 50 receiving Etanercept was significantly higher than in patients receiving placebo, while no significant differences were noted between the Etanercept and placebo group in other indices. There was no statistical significance among different dosages. Patient Injection-site reaction rate for Etanercept was higher than that for placebo. No significant differences were observed in other adverse effects. Conclusions Etanercept is safe and effective for patients with Ankylosing spondylitis, however, some trials included in the review were of poor quality, so we needed the multi-center, large-scale randomized controlled trials of higher quality and the same course of treatment to confirm this.
ObjectiveTo compare the cost-effectiveness of etanercept combined with methotrexate to methotrexate plus placebo in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and to provide references for clinical practice.MethodsDecision tree model was developed to estimate the cost-effectiveness from the perspective of the health care system by TreeAge Pro 2016 software. The cost-effectiveness of the two treatments were compared by incremental analysis, and the robustness of the results were analyzed by sensitivity analysis.ResultsThe cost of etanercept combined methotrexate group in one year duration was ¥212 692, the effective rate (ACR50) was 66.4%; the cost of methotrexate combined with placebo group in one year duration was ¥572, the effective rate (ACR50) was 40.6%. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of two groups was ¥818 000/person, and the sensitivity analysis showed that the results were robust.ConclusionEtanercept combined methotrexate is significant more effective than methotrexat. But the cost of etanercept combined methotrexate is too high to afford and is not economical compared to methotrexate.