ObjectiveTo set up the evaluation form for classroom teaching quality in nursing humanities concern education, in order to conduct the evaluation on nursing teachers in their teaching of humanistic concern in their nursing class teaching. MethodsWe applied the Delphi approach to consult 16 nursing experts to screen the evaluation indicators combining with the method of dispersion degree. Analytic hierarchy process was carried out to determine the indicator weight to establish the evaluation form. Then we used the form to investigate a small sample of 37 nursing teachers. According to the test results, we checked the reliability and validity of the evaluation form. ResultsThe evaluation form was finally determined. It consisted of five level-1 indicators as well as 23 level-2 indicators. The results of Cranach's α showed that the internal consistency reliability and sensitivity of the evaluation form were very high. The results of Spearman correlation analysis showed that the construction of the evaluation form was quite reasonable. The results of factor analysis showed that the discriminant validity of the evaluation form was quite good. ConclusionThe evaluation form is true, credible and reasonably built. It may be used for self-assessment by the teachers, mutual evaluation as well as evaluation of teachers by leaders or experts for the assessment of humanistic teaching in nursing classes.
ObjectiveNew Rural Cooperative Medical Systems (NCMS) has been constructed as a financial protection for rural population commencing 2003. With the development of NCMS, there were quite a few management models existing across the nation. In order to assess the management alternatives, we try to explore how to set up a set of indicators to analysis management effect of different management models. MethodsBy literature review, we sorted all qualitative indicators into 8 types. Delphi and Multi-Attribute utility theories were applied to construct the appraisal indicators, including shaping first and second level indicators and assigning the weights for each type of indicators. ResultsWe managed to identify the indicator system which was comprised of 4 types of first level indicators, aiming at claim, manament process, transparency and supervision on accredited hospitals. Besides, there were 9 sub-indicators. ConclusionThe evaluation indicators are constructed for future assessment on management effect of rural health insurance.