Objective To provide evidence for the establishment and improvement of public health system in China by comparing national public health emergency system of some representative countries.Methods The principle and method of evidence-based science were applied to search and evaluate data from the official websites of China, United States, United Kingdom, Australia and Singapore. The performance of each country’s public health emergency response system in SARS prevention and control, as well as their organization structure and mechanism were compared. The existing problems and corresponding countermeasures were then put forward. Results Public health system showed the best performance was in US, UK and Australia. The responding mechanism of Singapore was highly admired by WHO. The organization structure of China was similar to that of developed countries, but its performance was far lagged behind because of insufficient financial support, poor management and inefficient operational mechanism. Conclusions The public health emergency response system in China needs to be reformed by giving priority to mechanism reinforcement. Different models should be taken into account regarding different regional situations in China.
The majority of problems are comprehensive and complex in the modern society, which leads to the increasing contradictions in the specialization and comprehensiveness of knowledge. Interdisciplinary cooperation is one approach to improve the effectiveness and transferability. The primary principle of evidence-based medicine is its scientific and transparent procedures. It combines the patient’s preferences with clinical experience and the best evidence. Meanwhile, evidence-based medicine is focused on how to transfer research outcomes into practice and the re-evaluation of the result of practice in order to striving for perfections. Combining this practical pattern of evidence-based medicine with other disciplines can have a significant improvement on scientific methods and thinking patterns, and become an effective way to improve the quality of scientific research and promote the transformation.
Nursing is one of the disciplines that has been influenced and inspired by the evidence-based medical thinking model during early times. In the past 20 years, evidence-based nursing has developed rapidly and vigorously in the field of international nursing and has become an inevitable trend of future nursing practice. Evidence-based nursing education, research and practice have been simultaneously promoted, and construction of the platform has gradually improved, forming a systematic evidence-based nursing science system and enriching the connotation of evidence-based science.
The increasing deteriorative trend of doctor-patient relationship (DPR) have destroyed patient safety, doctor safety and social stability in China. DPR is a complicated social problem related to multidisciplinary and multi-factor interactions. A series of researches providing different views on how to improve DPR in China have been published in recently years. Evidence-based medicine (EBM) aims to deal with massive information by producing, synthesizing and disseminating evidence from complex interventions. We tried to explore the trait of DPR by EBM methods. We provided evidence on research trends, topics and methods by systematic database retrieval, classification by screening, and quality assessment. Through dissection, attribution, and visualization of interactions and relationships between factors, we provided an evidence-supported framework for improvement of DPR. We identified gaps, defects or deficiencies in existing research, and promoted further research. We continued to follow up the research and faced a challenge: Reflection and frustration in the process of establishing the quality evaluation system of qualitative research. We found that the study of complex humanities and social sciences by reference to evidence-based methodology might be: providing a structured, panoramic perspective for complex social problems on " de-fragmentation”, providing a framework for social governance through classification and hierarchy, and calling for a more tolerant attitude and more comprehensive application of methodologies.
Evidence-based medicine (EBM) provides a reliable evidence decision-making model for the medical field. The concepts and methods of EBM are gradually extended to other disciplines. At present, the paradigm of evidence-based science (EBS) is formally proposed, which is not only based on a methodological cooperation between different disciplines, but also a deeper potential driving force in optimizing the operation process of knowledge. The advantages of EBS helps promote its extension to other disciplines through standardization concepts and systematic methods, through which the common theories and supporting organization of EBS are formed. Under the guideline of EBS, the evidence-based concepts and methods will play a supportive role in scientific development.
Science is a system of knowledge that reflects the essential connections and laws of the objective world. Classification of disciplines is a subsystem of science, which involves the development of human cognition which evolved from the scientific category to the department of higher education, and then formation of a complex management system. Nowadays with the rapid development of science and technology which triggering numerous complex social problems, an increasing trend of scientific integration calls for multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary research and education. In the 1990s, evidence-based medicine was emerged in the self-doubting of medical science, and extended to other fields of medicine, health policy and social sciences, forming an interdisciplinary evidence-based science system. Evidence-based science is an embodiment of scientific integration, and also the carrier and mechanism of cross-disciplinary convergence. It attempts to break through barriers of disciplines and management, and promotes interdisciplinary research, during which it has encountered many difficulties due to limitations of traditional disciplines. Evidence-based science does not provide an intrusion or transformation of thinking paradigm into other disciplines, but rather an equal dialogue to promote broader discipline collaboration and a new round of self-improvement, so as to constantly explore novel methods and theories to solve emerging problems, achieve continuous improvement, and pursue excellence.
Regulatory science of medical devices serves the scientific research and regulatory activities for supervision of medical devices. Principles of science and transparency and conduction of evidence-based study, which is advocated in Evidence-based science(EBS), also apply to regulatory science of medical devices, including using evidence-based scientific tools and methods to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness, as well as quality, efficacy and cost-effectiveness of total life cycle of medical products, target customers, and scope. EBS provides both new methods and tools for regulatory science for medical devices, and provides a new basis for further scientific regulatory decisions.
The essence of ensuring universal nutritional health lies in achieving a balance between the growing demand for nutritional health and the supply of adequate and balanced nutritional services. This paper learns and draws on the ideological theory and methodological support of evidence-based science, optimizing practices, reevaluations, monitoring risks, producing evidence and cultivating talents so as to enable the interdisciplines of evidence-based nutrition and develop in a localized way and gain optimal timeliness, quantity and quality.