ObjectivesTo provide methodology support for the tracking assessment of specific resolution execution through evidence-based construction of tracking assessment index system for resolution execution of WHO essential medicine accessibility resolution, so as to further promote and improve the establishment of national essential medicine policies, and offer a methodology reference to survey and assess the resolution executions in other public health fields.MethodsA multi-disciplinary team was set up to preliminarily construct the index system by means of earlier system assessment index through index screening based on Delphi method. The weight of each index was determined by analytic hierarchy process.ResultsAfter two rounds of expert consultation, the index system available for resolution execution measures and results of WHO essential medicine accessibility were established, including 9 indexes of resolution execution measures. Meanwhile, the execution results of index contained 4 first class indexes, 13 second class indexes and 36 third class indexes. Each of the indexes obtained its own weight according to degree of importance.ConclusionsIn this study, the assessment index for resolution execution of essential medicine accessibility is established, however, the empirical research is still required to further verify the scientificity as well as feasibility of this index system.
ObjectivesTo initially construct a scientific, reasonable and precision medicine technology value judgment framework suitable for China’s national conditions based on expert consultation method, so as to provide scientific value judgment system support for China's medical insurance decision-making.MethodsThe preliminary evaluation indicator system for precision medicine technology value was established by using literature analysis and expert consultation method, and the direct weighting method was used to determine the indicators weight.ResultsAfter two rounds of expert consultation, an indicator system suitable for the value judgment of precision medicine technology in China was constructed, including 5 primary indicators (health needs, health effects, economics, innovation and suitability) and 14 secondary indicators. Each indicator was weighted according to importance.ConclusionsA set of precision medicine value judgment indicator system suitable for China has been initially established, which lays a certain foundation for further measurement research of the indicator system and provides a scientific basis for medical insurance decision-making.
ObjectivesTo use the Delphi method to preliminarily perfect the comprehensive evaluation index system which had been initially constructed by systematic review processes of diabetes food for special medical purposes (FSMP).MethodsThree rounds of expert consultation by Delphi method were compared to define indices held in the evidence-based comprehensive evaluation index system of diabetes FSMP and ways to distinguish effects.ResultsThe preliminary perfect index system after 3 rounds of expert consultation contained 4 primary directory indicators, 15 secondary directory indicators, and 20 tertiary indicators. Among them, the end index which could directly be used for evaluation contained a total of 27 indicators.ConclusionsThe index system is categorized into 4 segments of parameters, which are medical, nutritional, safety and other indices, which has addressed the problem posed by CFDA documents on how to scientifically validate the medical effect and safety of FSMP. It provides great significance to assess and supervise FSMP prior to and after it goes to public, assess characteristics and advantages of MNT, and improves nutrition economy and its social benefits.
Objective To construct an index system for the rational use of foods for special medical purposes (FSMP) by medical institutions. Methods Based on the literature review and the survey of 300 medical institutions, we developed a questionnaire for expert consultation and conducted two rounds of expert consultation using Delphi method and consensus meeting method to determine the final index system for the rational use of FSMP in medical institutions. Results After two rounds of expert consultation and expert consensus conference meetings, it was finally determined that medical institutions should reasonably use the FSMP comprehensive evaluation index system, including 3 first-level catalog indicators, 17 second-level catalog indicators, and 13 third-level catalog indicators. Conclusion This index system can help promote the rationalization and standardization of FSMP clinical application in medical institutions in China and improve the quality of clinical nutrition care.