ObjectiveTo introduce the current study of the metastatic mode and operation methods in advanced gallbladder carcinoma. MethodsThe literatures about metastatic mode and operation methods of advanced gallbladder carcinoma in recent 5 years were reviewed.ResultsLymph node and hepatic invasion were the main mode of advanced gallbladder carcinoma. The Japanese Society of Biliary Surgery （JSBS） classification to gallbladder carcinoma was more reasonable than the UICC classification. The survival rate after radical resection was higher than that after cholecytectomy in patients with T2n1-2M0. In the patients that tumor extended adjacent organs but the lymph node metastatic localized within n2, extended radical resection provided a survival advantage. If the patients’ tumor was not resectable or who had lymph node metastasis beyond n3, the benefit of extended radical resection seemed limited.ConclusionIn the carefully selected patients, extended radical resection will improve the prognosis of advanced gallbladder carcinoma.
Objective To evaluate the long-term efficacy of extended and standard surgery for carcinoma of head of pancreas by using meta-analysis. Methods Related articls （1990-2012） were searched in Pubmed， WOS， Embase， WanFang， SinoMed， and CNKI. Study on quality of these literatures were evaluated by using the Jadad score. The patients with pancreatic head carcinoma underwent extended radical resection and standard radical resection were classified to treatment group and control group， respectively. The mortality， morbidity， and survival rates of 1-， 3-， and 5-year after operation in the two groups were evaluated by using meta-analysis. Results A total of 11 studies fitted the selection crit-eria， including 744 patients. Among them 357 cases were in standard radical resection group and 387 cases in the extended radical resection group. The results of meta-analysis showed that： ①The morbidity after operation did not significantly differed between the extended radical resection group and standard radical resection group （OR=1.360， 95% CI=0.990-1.870， P=0.050）. ②The mortality of the two groups did not significantly differed （OR=0.870， 95% CI=0.430-1.760，P=0.700）. ③There were no significant differences in survival rates of 1-， 3-， and 5-year between the two groups （OR=0.880， 95% CI=0.450-1.720， P=0.710；OR=0.940， 95% CI=0.590-1.480，P=0.710；OR=1.000， 95% CI=0.600-1.67， P=1.000）. Conclusion Compared with standard radical resection， extended radical resection can not improve the survival rates of 1-， 3-， and 5-year after operation， and can’t reduce the mortality and morbidity after operation