ObjectiveTo investigate the risk factors and prevention strategies of postoperative delirium in Stanford B aortic dissection. MethodsClinical data of the patients diagnosed with Stanford B aortic dissection and undergoing endovascular aortic repair from January 2020 to August 2021 in our department were retrospectively collected. Patients were divided into a non-delirium group and a delirium group according to the presence of postoperative delirium. The risk factors for postoperative delirium after Stanford type B aortic dissection and the protective effect of dexmedetomidine on delirium were analyzed. ResultsA total of 659 patients with Stanford type B aortic dissection were enrolled, including 540 males and 119 females with a median age of 58.00 (41.00, 75.00) years. There were 450 patients in the non-delirium group, and 209 patients in the delirium group. There was no statistical difference in gender, body mass index, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, smoking and drinking history, cholesterol triglyceride level, or creatinine glomerular filtration rate (P＞0.05). Age was an independent risk factor for postoperative delirium in Stanford type B aortic dissection (OR=1.392, 95%CI 1.008-1.923, P=0.044). Moreover, whether dexmedetomidine was used or not had no effect on the duration of postoperative delirium (χ2=4.662, P=0.588). Conclusion Age is an independent risk factor for postoperative delirium in patients with Stanford type B aortic dissection. The incidence of postoperative delirium in young patients is lower than that in the patients with middle and elderly age, and it may be of reference value to prevent postoperative delirium. Dexmedetomidine has no significant effect on controlling the duration of postoperative delirium.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) on the hospital mortality of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) by using cumulative meta-analysis. MethodsThe PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, WanFang Data, CNKI, and VIP databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) related to the objective from inception to June 30, 2022. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. A cumulative meta-analysis was then performed by using StataSE 12.0 software. ResultsA total of 9 RCTs involving 533 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that APRV could reduce the hospital mortality of patients with ARDS (RR=0.70, 95%CI 0.54 to 0.91, P<0.01) compared with traditional mechanical ventilation. ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that APRV can reduce the hospital mortality of patients with ARDS. Due to the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
ObjectivesTo investigate the effect of prone position ventilation (PPV) on patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).MethodsPatients with ARDS who received PPV treatment in the this hospital were enrolled from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017. The changes in heart rate, respiratory mechanics and blood gas index before and after PPV in patients, the inhaled oxygen concentration (FiO2), oxygenation index (PaO2/FiO2), pressure sore and other related complications were observed and compared in patients before and after PPV.ResultsA total of 28 patients with ARDS were registered, including 21 males and 7 females. Fourteen patients were complicated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and 20 were dead in 28 days. After PPV, the peak pressure and plateau pressure decreased significantly, PaO2 and SaO2 increased significantly, system compliance improved considerably but PaCO2 did not change. There was no significant difference in the changes of heart reat, respiratory rate, minute volume, tidal volume and positive end-expiratory pressure between before and after PPV. FiO2 decreased significantly, PaO2/FiO2 increased significantly, and pressure sore increased significantly on day 1 post-PPV in comparison to pre-PPV and on day 7 post-PPV in comparison to day 1 post-PPV. A total of 13 unplanned extubation occurred during the entire PPV procedure, 9 of them were gastric tube slipping, 2 were urethral catheter slipping, 1 was tracheal tube slipping, and 1 was deep venous catheter slipping. There were 17 cases of artificial airway obstruction, 7 cases of hypotension, 3 cases of arrhythmia, and 4 cases of keratitis. In the subgroup analysis, the age of the patients complicated with COPD was significantly higher, but there was no difference in additional baseline data and the survival rate.ConclusionPPV can significantly improve the patient's respiratory status, especially oxygenation and respiratory mechanics, but PPV can increase the incidence of complications such as pressure sore, and PPV does not improve the prognosis.
ObjectiveTo design a ventilator humidifier that can ensure water level and infuse fluid automatically, and evaluate its application effect in patients with mechanical ventilation.MethodsThirty-eight patients who received mechanical ventilation in ICU from March to June in 2019 were included. According to the order of admission, they were divided into a study group with 18 patients and a control group with 20 patients. Different ventilator humidifiers were used. The study group used self-designed ventilator humidifier, and the control group used the MR370 humidifier. The cases of sputum viscosity with Ⅲ degree after 48 hours’ mechanical ventilation, the times of fluid infusion and the total amount of fluid infusion were compared. The times of pouring out condensate water and the total amount of pouring out condensate water in 24 hours were also compared.ResultsThe times of infusing liquid in the study group in 24 hours was less than that in the control group (3.3±0.5 vs. 11.2±1.7, P<0.01), but the other indicators were not statistically significant between the two groups (all P>0.05).ConclusionsThe self-designed ventilator humidifier can be used for patients with mechanical ventilation, which can keep the water level at the water line all the time and is beneficial to humidification treatment. It can reduce the times of fluid infusion and nurses' workload.