ObjectiveTo use failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) to check and improve the risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 nucleic acid detection, and explore the application effect of FMEA in the emergency inspection items.MethodsFMEA was used to sort out the whole process of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 nucleic acid detection from January 30 to February 21, 2020. By establishing the theme, setting up a team, analyzing the failure mode and potential influencing factors. Then calculate the risk priority number (RPN), formulate preventive measures and implement continuous improvement according to the analysis results.ResultsA total of 2 138 cases were included. After improvement, the number of potential failure modes has been reduced by 2 (17 vs.19); the value of total RPN decreased (3 527.49 vs. 1 858.28). There was significant difference in average RPN before and after improvement [(185.66±74.34) vs. (97.80±37.97); t=6.128, P<0.001].ConclusionsIn the early stage of emergency inspection items, using FMEA can systematically check the risk factors in the process, develop improvement measures. It also can effectively reduce the risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 nucleic acid detection in hospital.
Objective To explore the clinical effect of failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) combined with PDCA cycle management model in the prevention and control of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) in intensive care unit (ICU), and provide evidences for drawing up improvement measures in healthcare-associated MDRO infections in ICU. Methods In January 2020, a risk assessment team was established in the Department of Critical Care Medicine, the First People’s Hospital of Longquanyi District of Chengdu, to analyze the possible risk points of MDRO infections in ICU from then on. FMEA was used to assess risks, and the failure modes with high risk priority numbers were selected to evaluate the high-risk points of MDRO infections. The causes of the high-risk points were analyzed, and improvement measures were formulated to control the risks through PDCA cycle management model. The incidence of healthcare-associated MDRO infections in ICU, improvement of high-risk events, and satisfaction of doctors and nurses after the implementation of intervention measures (from January 2020 to June 2021) were retrospectively collected and compared with those before the implementation of intervention measures (from January 2018 to December 2019). Results Six high-risk factors were screened out, namely single measures of isolation, unqualified cleaning and disinfection of bed units, irrational use of antimicrobial agents, weak consciousness of isolation among newcomers of ICU, weak awareness of pathogen inspection, and untimely disinfection. The incidence of healthcare-associated MDRO infections was 2.71% (49/1800) before intervention and 1.71% (31/1808) after intervention, and the difference between the two periods was statistically significant (χ2=4.224, P=0.040). The pathogen submission rate was 56.67% (1020/1800) before intervention and 61.23% (1107/1808) after intervention, and the difference between the two periods was statistically significant (χ2=7.755, P=0.005). The satisfaction rate of doctors and nurses was 75.0% (30/40) before intervention and 95.0% (38/40) after intervention, and the difference between the two periods was statistically significant (χ2=6.275, P=0.012). Conclusions FMEA can effectively find out the weak points in the prevention and treatment of MDRO infections in ICU, while PDCA model can effectively formulate improvement measures for the weak points and control the risks. The combined application of the two modes provides a scientific and effective guarantee for the rational prevention and treatment of MDRO infections in ICU patients.
Objective To explore the process of using failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) to optimize the management of specimens from relatives of patients and analyze its effects. Methods The data of the specimens tested by the family members of hospital patients between October 2019 and June 2020 in the Children’s Hospital of Fudan University were collected. The data between October 2019 and March 2020 were taken as the pre-FMEA group, and the data between April 2020 and June 2020 were taken as the FMEA group. We used FMEA method to evaluate the risk points in the management of specimens from relatives of patients, analyzed the reasons to propose improvement measures, and compared the effect of optimizing the management of specimens from relatives of patients before and after the implementation of FMEA. Results A total of 12 117 specimens from relatives of patients were included, including 6 132 cases in the pre-FMEA group and 5 985 cases in the FMEA group. A total of 13 potential failure modes were found, including 3 high risk, 3 medium risk and 7 low risk. After the implementation of FMEA, the 3 high risk failure modes, 1 medium risk failure modes “inspection type application error” and 1 low risk failure modes “diagnosis error” were lower than that pre-FMEA (P<0.05). The interview results showed that the job satisfaction and work risk awareness of relevant medical staff were improved after the implementation of FMEA. Conclusions The use of FMEA to optimize the management process of patient family specimens accurately captures the risk points. After the implementation of the improvement, the potential risk of the process is reduced, possible errors are prevented, work efficiency and job satisfaction are improved, and it can be used as a reference for hospital managers.
Objective To explore the application value of failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) in the risk management of unplanned extubation after esophageal cancer surgery. Methods A total of 1 140 patients who underwent esophageal cancer surgery in our department from January 2015 to May 2017 were selected as a control group, including 948 males and 192 females with an average age of 64.45±4.53 years. FMEA was used to analyze the risk management process of unplanned extubation. The potential risk factors in each process were found by calculating the risk priority number (RPN) value, and the improvement plan was formulated for the key process with RPN>125 points. Then 1 117 patients who underwent esophageal cancer surgery from June 2017 to December 2019 were selected as a trial group, including 972 males and 145 females with an average age of 64.60±5.22 years, and the FMEA risk management mode was applied.Results The corrective measures were taken to optimize the high-risk process, and the RPN values of 9 high-risk processes were reduced to below 125 points after using FMEA risk management mode. The rate of unplanned extubation in the trial group was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion The application of FMEA in the risk management of unplanned extubation after esophageal cancer surgery can reduce the rate of unplanned extubation, improve the quality of nursing, and ensure the safety of patients.