Objective To evaluate the effect of Otago exercise program (OEP) on fear of falling in central hemiplegia patients in communities. Methods We collected the clinical data of 61 central hemiplegia patients in the Department of Neurology of Pangang General Hospital from January to June 2014. They were randomly divided into treatment group (n=30) and control group (n=31) after discharge. The treatment group had OEP, while the control group had not. After 20 weeks of follow-up, we evaluated fall self-efficacy, balance and mobility of patients in the two groups. Results The OEP adherence rate was 73.3% for the treatment group. In the treatment group, modified fall efficacy scale (MFES) score and Berg balance scale (BBS) score were significantly higher than those before intervention (P<0.05); time up and go test (TUGT) score was significantly lower than that before intervention (P<0.05). In the control group, MFES score, BBS score and TUGT score were not significantly changed (P>0.05). After intervention, MFES score and BBS score of the treatment group were significantly higher than those of the control group (P<0.05), but TUGT score was not significantly different (P>0.05). Conclusion OEP for central hemiplegia patients after discharge can reduce fall self-efficacy and increase balance ability of the patients.
ObjectiveThis study aimed to systematically review the quality of psychometric properties and methodological quality of the Chinese versions of fear of falling assessment tools for the elderly, providing evidence-based guidance for medical staff in selecting high-quality assessment tools. MethodsWe systematically searched CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP, CBM, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases for studies related to the evaluation of psychometric properties and methodological quality of fear of falling assessment tools for the elderly. The search spanned from the inception of the databases to January 19, 2024. Two researchers independently screened literature and extracted data using the consensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement instruments. The COSMIN risk of bias checklist and quality criteria were employed to evaluate instrument measurement characteristics and formulate final recommendations. ResultsFifteen studies involving 11 Chinese versions of fear of falling assessment tools for the elderly were included. None of the studies reported measurement error, cross-cultural validity, or responsiveness. Due to insufficient or uncertain content validity and low or below-quality evidence, all 11 tools received a recommendation of level B. ConclusionAmong the 11 instruments, the Chinese version of IFES demonstrates the most balanced measurement characteristics, along with good reliability and validity. However, further verification of other measurement characteristics of this instrument is warranted.