Objective To determine the efficacy of forced expiratory volume in six seconds( FEV6 ) as an alternative for forced vital capacity( FVC) in the diagnosis for mild-moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease( COPD) .Methods A total of 402 mild-moderate COPD and 217 non-COPD patients’ spirometric examinations were retrospectively analyzed. The correlation between FEV6 and FVC, FEV1 /FVC and FEV1 /FEV6 was evaluated by the Spearman test. Considering FEV1 /FVC lt;70% as being the ‘golden standard’ for airway obstruction, a ROC curve was used to determine the best cut-off point for the FEV1 /FEV6 ratio in the diagnosis for COPD. Results The Spearman correlation test revealed the FEV1 and FEV6 , FEV1 /FEV6 and FEV1 /FVC ratios were highly correlated ( r = 0. 992, 0. 980, respectively, P = 0. 000) . Using FEV1 /FEV6 lt; 70% as the diagnosis standard, 12. 69% of the 402 patients could not be diagnosed as COPD. The FEV1 /FVC ratio of these patients was very close to 70% . The best cut-off point for the FEV1 /FEV6 ratio in the diagnosis of mild-moderate COPD was 72% while the sensitivity and specificity were 94. 7% and 92. 2% , respectively. Conclusions There is a b correlation between FEV1 /FVC and FEV1 /FEV6 . The FEV6 can be a valid alternative for FVC in the diagnosis for mild-moderate COPD, although it may result in false negative. The best cut-off point for the FEV1 /FEV6 ratio is 72% .
Objective To evaluate if the difference between slow vital capacity ( VC) and forced vital capacity ( FVC) could be used to predict severity of airflow limitation in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ( COPD) . Methods VC and FVC were measured in 200 patients with COPD [ 159 males;mean FEV1 , ( 49.31 ±15.75) % of predicted] and 114 healthy controls [ 64 males; mean FEV1 , ( 99.67 ±13.62) % of predicted] . Results The difference between VC and FVC ( VC - FVC) , which showed a negative correlation with FEV1 of predicted ( r=- 0.412, Plt;0.001) , was significantly larger in the COPD patients than that in the controls [ ( 145.40 ±157.50) mL vs. ( 21. 10 ±61. 30) mL, Plt; 0. 001] . The FVC/VC ratio was significantly lower in the COPD patients than that in the controls [ ( 93. 61 ± 7. 10) % vs. ( 99.27 ±2.24) % , P lt; 0.001] , and was positively correlated with FEV1 of predicted in the COPD patients ( r =0.517, P lt;0.001) . There was significant difference in VC - FVC in the COPD patients with FEV1≥50% of predicted ( 5 patients in GOLD level 1 and 74 patients in GOLD level 2) and those patients with FEV1 lt;50% of predicted ( 106 patients in GOLD level 3 and 15 patients in GOLD level 4) [ ( 78.23 ±108.26) mL vs. ( 189.26 ±169.21) mL, P =0.003] . Conclusion The difference between VC and FVC and the FVC/VC ratio, which are more easily obtained from spirometric test, are able to detect severity of airflow limitation in patients with stable COPD.