ObjectiveTo understand the current research status of conservative mastectomy with breast reconstruction for breast cancer, so as to provide a reference for surgeons and patients with breast cancer to choose surgical method. MethodThe recently domestic and foreign literature on the research of conservative mastectomy with breast reconstruction for breast cancer was reviewed and summarized. ResultsAt present, conservative mastectomy mainly included nipple sparing mastectomy, skin sparing mastectomy, and skin reduction mastectomy. All three surgical methods were safe and effective in the treatment of breast cancer, and the complications could be controlled. When combined with breast reconstruction, the better cosmetic effect could be obtained, and the postoperative satisfaction and quality of life of patients were markedly improved. ConclusionsAfter comprehensively preoperative evaluation for patients with breast cancer, conservative mastectomy provides a treatment choice for them. After conservative mastectomy, individualized reconstruction scheme is formulated according to size and sagging degree of breast, as well as individual expectations of patients, which can obtain a higher quality of life while treating diseases for patients with breast cancer.
ObjectiveTo summarize the progress of the researches about nano-carbon tattoo in targeted lymph node dissection of breast cancer. MethodThe relevant studies on the application of nano-carbon tattoo to target lymph nodes in the breast cancer at home and abroad were searched and the feasibility and shortcomings of this method were summarized. ResultFrom the studies reported, the nano-carbon tattoo method had a high detection rate (64.0%–100%) and coincidence rate (55.0%–100%), as well as a lower false negative rate (0.0%–9.1%) in the labeling of breast cancer targeted lymph nodes. ConclusionsThe nano-carbon tattoo method is a useful, simple, and safe in the labeling of targeted lymph nodes in breast cancer. But the specific implementation scheme of this method, such as the optimal labeling dosage, the number of labeled lymph nodes, and the improvement of patients’ quality of life are still unclear, which still needs more large-scale prospective research to verify.