ObjectiveTo provide theoretical and technological support for further study of liver metabolism and disease by comparing the advantages and disadvantages of various artificial liver models (biological). MethodsLiteratures were searched and compared to summarize the requirement for liver donor, isolation, and culture of hepatocyte. ResultsIn the separation method of hepatocyte, mechanical separation method had no requirement for liver donor, and was easy to acquire hepatocyte, while the acquired hepatocyte would be destructed severely, and the survival rate was low. On the other hand, the restriction of the digestion of the hepatocytes to the liver cell samples was unlimited, while the key of the enzyme digestion method was to regulate the balance between enzyme concentration and digestion time, which was limited to function researches of hepatocyte, and research about the responds of hepatocyte against outside, and other few researches. Perfusion digestion method had been widely applied for animal test. The Ca2+, collagenase and perfusion rate, pH value, buffer, and intubation method all play vital roles. During the cultivation, we needed to choose different methods according to several experiments, and add different additives in the appropriate medium. Different biological reactors had different advantages, disadvantages, and applicable conditions. ConclusionsThe donor selection is based on various experimental purposes to harvest hepatocytes from different sources. Whether on the separation process or on the cultivation process, according to the specific circumstances, such as the concentration, perfusion time, and the choice of different kinds of culture medium, we can choose different kinds of bioreactors, but all kinds of methods are still remained with multiple insufficiencies, which require more researchers to improve.
ObjectiveTo summarize the procedure of transumbilical single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) with conventional laparoscopic instruments for different tumor diameter and different site of gastric stromal tumor. MethodThe clinical data, intraoperative procedure, and postoperative recovery of 34 patients with gastric stromal tumor from December 2009 to February 2014 in this hospital were analyzed retrospectively. ResultsThe transumbilical SILS was performed successfully in all the 34 patients.Among these patients, the wedge resection of stomach was perfor-med in 27 patients, distal subtotal gastrectomy was performed in 6 patients, distal subtotal gastrectomy complicated with multivisceral resection was performed in 1 patient.The pathology confirmed that the diameter of tumors was from 0.6 cm to 10.0 cm (average 3.4 cm).The resection margins were tumor free.The risk assessment showed that tumors with extremely low risk were in 9 cases, low risk were in 17 cases, intermediate risk were in 6 cases, high risk were in 2 cases.During surgery, 9 tumors were located on the fundus of stomach, 6 tumors on the gastric greater curvature, 7 tumors on the gastric lesser curvature, 2 tumors on the anterior and posterior wall of the stomach respectively, 3 tumors on the cardia below, 4 tumors on the gastric antrum, tumor invaded the surrounding organs in 1 case.There was no conversion to open or conventional laparoscopic surgery.no intraoperative or postoperative complications were experi-enced in all the patients except one was postoperative intraperitoneal bleeding and one was incision infection.All the patients were followed for an average of 25 months (range 3-49 months), there was no evident recurrence of disease. ConclusionsThe transumbilical SILS for gastric stromal tumor is a feasible and safe technique when performed by an experienced laparoscopic surgeon.The suitable procedure of SILS should be selected for gastric stromal tumor according their different size and location.