ObjectiveTo study the imaging manifestation and clinicopathologic characteristics of rectal stromal tumors. MethodsThe CT and MRI data of 8 patients with pathology proved rectal stromal tumors were retrospectively analyzed, and the correlation between the imaging features and pathological results were analyzed. ResultsAll of 8 cases were malignant. One case was submucosal. It showed irregular thickening of the rectal wall with a diameter of about 2.6 cm, and small ulcers with low-risk could be seen. Three cases were intramural with diameters of about 0.7－10.0 cm. Small lesion located in rectum, and the larger lesions showed internal and external growth across the rectal wall and the main part of the mass was outside the rectum. They were heterogeneous enhancement. One case accompanied with adenocarcinoma. One case was extremely low-risk, two cases were high-risk. Four cases were subserous. The diameter was about 4.2－16.5 cm. CT showed round or lobular, well-circumscribed, exophytic, hypervascular, and heterogeneous masses with cystic necrosis and hemorrhage. They displaced rectum occasionally. Lymphadenopathy in the left groin was developed in one case. Two cases were highrisk, two cases were intermediated-risk. No cases developed intestinal obstruction. Results of immunohistochemistry: CD117 was positive in 7 cases, CD34 positive in five cases, CD117 and CD34 positive in four cases, CD117 negative but CD34 positive in one case, CD117 positive but CD34 negative in three cases. Five cases were followed up, among whom 3 cases recurred. ConclusionsRectal stromal tumor is rare. Imaging appearances of rectal stromal tumors are specific. Its final diagnosis depends on immunohistochemistry examination. It has generally higher degree of malignancy and the prognosis is relatively poor.
ObjectiveTo explore the value of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). MethodWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 110 patients with surgical pathology confirmed GISTs between January 2008 and December 2013. All the patients underwent routine ultrasound examination. Thirty-two patients accepted oral contrast enhanced bowel ultrasonography, and 5 patients underwent trans-rectal ultrasound (TRUS). ResultsA total of 107 cases were detected out of the 110 cases of GISTs by ultrasonography, and the other three cases were missed. Among the 107 cases, 104 were shown to be masses, and 3 had thick gastric or intestinal walls. Among the 104 masses, hypo-echoic lesions were found in 73, heterogeneous lesions were found in 25, and hyper-echoic lesions were found in 6; 30 cases of tumor were less than 5 cm in diameter, 54 were between 5 cm to 10 cm in diameter, and 20 were longer than 10 cm in diameter (including 5 were longer than 20 cm in diameter). In the 107 cases, 12 were found to have liver metastasis, 4 were detected to have abdominal lymph node enlargement, and 3 had ascites. Surgery and pathological results showed that among the 110 cases of gastrointestinal stromal tumors, 91 developed from the stomach and intestine and the other 19 were extra-gastrointestinal stromal tumors; 72 were at high risk, 21medium risk, and 17 low risk. ConclusionsThe detection rate of GISTs by ultrasonography is high, but the quantitative and qualitative diagnosis ability should be raised.