west china medical publishers
Keyword
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Keyword "Gd-EOB-DTPA" 2 results
  • Diagnostic Value of Gadoxetic Acid Disodium (Gd-EOB-DTPA) for the Detection of Liver Metastases: A Meta-analysis

    ObjectiveTo systematically review the diagnostic value of gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) for liver metastases. MethodsWe searched databases including CNKI, CBM, VIP, WanFang Data, PubMed, EMbase and The Cochrane Library from January 2011 to December 2014 to collect diagnostic tests about Gd-EOB-DTPA for liver metastases. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of included studies by using the QUADAS-2 (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2) tool. Then, meta-analysis was performed by using Stata 12.0 software. ResultsA total of 15 studies from seven countries were included, involving 2 040 nodules from 701 patients. The results of meta-analysis showed that, the pooled sensitivity (Sen), specificity (Spe), positive likelihood ratio (+LR), negative likelihood ratio (-LR) and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of Gd-EOB-DTPA for liver metastases were 0.92 (95%CI 0.89 to 0.95), 0.94 (95%CI 0.89 to 0.97), 14.51 (95%CI 8.01 to 26.28), 0.08 (95%CI 0.06 to 0.12), and 177.98 (95%CI 89.50 to 353.94), respectively. The area under curve (AUC) of SROC was 0.97 (95%CI 0.95 to 0.98). The results of subgroup analysis showed that Gd-EOB-DTPA had better Sen in nodules >10 mm than the nodules ≤10 mm in diameter (>10 mm: pooled Sen=0.97, 95%CI 0.94 to 0.99; ≤10 mm: pooled Sen=0.75, 95%CI 0.65 to 0.85; P<0.001); The 3.0T MR had better Sen in diagnosing liver metastases compared with 1.5T MR (3.0T: pooled Sen=0.95, 95%CI 0.92 to 0.97; 1.5T: pooled Sen=0.90, 95%CI 0.87 to 0.94; P<0.001). ConclusionGdEOB-DTPA is of value for the detection of liver metastases. In particular, it is of high sensitivity for the detection of nodules larger than 10 mm, and for the cases using 3.0T high-field MR system. Due to limited quantity and quality of the included studies, more high-quality studies are required to verify the above conclusion.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Differential diagnostic efficacy of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for dysplastic nodules and hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis

    ObjectiveTo systematically review the overall diagnostic efficacy of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI in differentiating dysplastic nodules (DNs) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), exploring whether the hepatobiliary phase can effectively improve diagnostic accuracy. MethodsThe PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang Data, and CBM databases were searched from January 1998 to March 2023 to identify original studies on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI for the differential diagnosis of DNs and HCC. Two investigators independently performed literature screening, extraction of data features and quality assessment. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata 17.0 and Meta-disc1.4 software. ResultsA total of 14 papers were included in this meta-analysis, including 375 DNs and 653 HCC. The results of meta-analysis showed that, in the multiparametric diagnostic sequence, the pooled Sen, Spe, PLR, NLR and AUC were 0.95 (95%CI 0.87 to 0.98), 0.95 (95%CI 0.91 to 0.97), 18.57 (95%CI 9.64 to 35.78), 0.06 (95%CI 0.02 to 0.14) and 0.98 (95%CI 0.97 to 0.99), respectively. ConclusionGd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI has a good differential diagnostic value for DNs and HCC. Hepatobiliary phase imaging also greatly compensates for the diagnostic deficiency of dynamic enhancement with low sensitivity for early HCC.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
1 pages Previous 1 Next

Format

Content