Objective To explore the osteogenic potential of cervical intervertebral disc fibroblasts in vitro, to investigate the regulatory factors of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2(rhBMP-2) and tumor necrosis factor α(TNF-α) on osteogenic phenotype of fibroblasts and to discuss the condition that facilitates osteogenesis of fibroblasts. Methods Theannulus fibroblasts cell lines of experiment goats were established in vitro and the biologicspecificity was found. According to different medias, 4 groups were included in this experiment: control group, TNF-α group ( 50 U/ml TNF-α), rhBMP-2 group (0.1 μg/ml rhBMP-2) and TNF-α+rhBMP-2 group (50 U/ml TNF-α+0.1 μg/ml rhBMP-2). Thefibroblasts were incubated in the media for about 3 weeks,and then the markers for osteogenic features were investigated by biochemistry, histochemistry observations. Results rhBMP-2 and TNF-α had no effect on the proliferation of fibroblasts from the experiment goats. rhBMP-2 or TNF-α could stimulate fibroblasts to secrete alkaline phosphatase and collagen type Ⅰ. The combined use of rhBMP-2 and TNF-α or the single use of rhBMP-2 could make fibroblasts to secrete osteocalin and the morphological changes of the fibroblasts were very obvious. Histochemical study of the nodules with specific new bone labeler(Alizarin red S) revealed positive reaction, denoting that the nodules produced by the fibroblasts werebone tissues. There was statistically significant difference(Plt;0.05) inALP activity between 3 experimental groups and control group and in secretion of osteocalcin between rhBMP-2 group, TNF-α+rhBMP-2 group and control group. Conclusion The results point out clearly that rhBMP-2 can induce theosteogenic potential of annulus fibroblasts in vitro.
Objective To investigate the ability to repair goat tibia defect with marrow stromal stem cells (MSCs) and bio-derived bone, and the feasibility of the compounds as bone substitute material. Methods MSCs were cultured with the bioderived bone in vitro, and the 20 mm tibia defect of goat was made and fixedwith plate. Eighteen goats were divided into experimental group, control group and blankgroup. The defects were not filled with anything in blank group, with tissue engineering bone in experimental group and bio-derived bone in control group. Therepair capability was assessed by physical, X-ray and bone mineral density examinations8,12,16, and 24 weeks after operation. Results In experimental group, the defects were partially repaired 8 weeks, and completely repaired12 and 16 weeks; there was significant difference in bone density between experimental group and control group (P＜0.05) 8,12 and 16 weeks, but no significant difference 24 weeks. The defects of blank group were not repaired 24weeks. Conclusion The tissue engineering bone can efficiently repair bone defect, and its repair capability is better than that of bio-derived bone alone both in quantity and quality of boneformation.