Due to the competition of new drug research and clinical requirement, speeding up drug development and marketing requires faster and more flexible clinical trial design that meets the ethical requirements. Different adaptive designs have emerged in clinical trials of different stages and purposes, for trial efficiency improvement. Adaptive design is more widely used in the field of oncology. Compared with traditional design, adaptive design is more complicated and requires higher level of methodology from researchers. Therefore, implementing adaptive design requires careful consideration and adequate preparation. This paper aims to summarize the design of adaptive methods used in different trial stages so as to provide reference for clinical research designers and implementers.
In recent years, investment in new drug development in China has surged; however, it faces challenges such as difficulties in efficacy validation, high failure rates, and lengthy, costly clinical trials. The traditional model is insufficient to address these issues, necessitating innovation. Adaptive designs (AD), particularly sequential multiple assignment randomized trials (SMART), have emerged as a flexible and efficient new pathway for drug development. This study focused on the two-stage design of SMART, analyzed its principles, and contrasted it with randomized controlled trials, group sequential designs, and crossover designs. The advantages of SMART were highlighted in terms of its precision in evaluating treatment strategies, minimizing sample wastage, and enhancing the exploration of complex treatment pathways. Through case analyses, we demonstrated that SMART significantly improved clinical trial efficiency and the quality of treatment decisions, representing an innovative solution to the challenges of new drug development. This study aims to provide strategic references for clinical researchers and promote the adoption of adaptive designs in China, thereby facilitating the efficient advancement of new drug development.