ObjectiveTo evaluate the feasibility to use ultrasonic cardiac output monitoring (USCOM) for patients after coronary artery bypass grafting. MethodsClinical data of 32 patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region between April and June 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 17 male and 15 female patients with their age of 46-76 (63.2±7.6) years. USCOM and pulmonary artery catheterization (PAC) were used to measure cardiac output (CO) synchronously,and the results were compared between USCOM and PAC. ResultsSixty-four pairs of data were collected from those 32 patients. No adverse event was observed with either USCOM or PAC. Mean CO was 4.27±0.92 L/min with USCOM and 4.49±0.75 L/min with PAC respectively,which were not statistically different (P=0.12) but significantly correlated (r=0.84,P<0.001). ConclusionThere is close correlation between USCOM and PAC for CO measurement. USCOM can not only measure CO accurately,but also has the advantages of being noninvasive,easy to perform and low cost.
ObjectiveTo investigate the influence of 6% hydroxyethyl starch (HES, 130/0.4)on blood coagulation of patients after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (opCAB)by thromboelastography (TEG). MethodsOne hundred patients undergoing elective opCAB in Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, General Hospital of Shenyang Military Area Command between May and July 2013 were enrolled in this study. All the patients were randomly divided into 2 groups using random number table method with 50 patients in each group. In the experimental group (G1 group), there were 27 males and 23 females with their age of 64.9±4.4 years, who received intravenous 6% HES (130/0.4)20 ml/kg in 4 hours postoperatively. In the control group (G2 group), there were 31 males and 19 females with their age of 63.1±5.8 years, who received intravenous lactated ringers 20 ml/kg in 4 hours postoperatively. After postoperative ICU admission, full blood count, coagulation tests and TEG were examined. Chest and mediastinal drainage was recorded at 6 hours and 24 hours postoperatively. ResultsThere was no statistical difference in chest and mediastinal drainage 24 hours postoperatively between the 2 groups (591.7±171.7 ml vs. 542.4±174.0 ml, P > 0.05). None of the patients received reexploration for bleeding. There was no statistical difference in hemoglobin, hematocrit, platelet count or traditional coagulation index between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). TEG showed no significant change in coagulation time after intravenous fluid infusion in either group. Reaction time was slightly extended in both groups, but there was no statistical difference in reaction time between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). Maximum amplitude (MA)of G1 group was significantly decreased after intravenous fluid infusion (55.9±10.0 mm vs. 62.8±7.9 mm, P < 0.05), but still within the normal range. There was no significant change in MA after intravenous fluid infusion in G2 group. ConclusionIntravenous infusion of 6% HES (130/0.4)20 ml/kg can reduce platelet function and clot strength, but does not significantly increase postoperative chest or mediastinal drainage, or the incidence of postoperative reexploration for bleeding. It's safe to administer 6% HES (130/0.4)for patients after OPCAB.
ObjectiveTo investigate acute physiologic and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ(APACHE Ⅱ) score system for severity evaluation and prognosis prediction of patients undergoing cardiac surgery. MethodsA total of 3 566 patients who were admitted in ICU after cardiac surgery in the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery of General Hospital of Shenyang Military between December 1, 2011 and August 31, 2013 were enrolled in this study. There were 1 873 males and 1 693 females with their average age of 45.8±23.7 years (range, 10 days to 82 years). All the patients were evaluated with APACHE Ⅱ and expected mortality was calculated. Receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curve was drawn to compare expected and actual mortality and evaluate predictive value of APACHE Ⅱ. ResultsA total of 3 373 patients survived the operation, and 193 patients died postoperatively with the mortality of 5.41%. The area under the ROC curve was 0.917 (P=0.000) with 95% confidence interval of[0.885,0.949]. The cut-off point of APACHE Ⅱ was 15.50, with a sensitivity of 80.3%,a specificity of 95.6%,an accuracy rate of 79.5%,a positive predictive value of 86.9%,and a negative predictive value of 93.1%. Expected and actual mortality increased with increasing APACHE Ⅱ,which were both positively correlated. ConclusionAPACHE Ⅱ score system can be used to evaluate severity and predict prognosis of patients undergoing cardiac surgery, which provides reference for rational utilization of ICU resource.