ObjectiveTo analyze the benefits of lung transplantation in the treatment of interstitial lung disease (ILD) and investigate its prognostic factors.MethodsThe clinical data of patients diagnosed with ILD and meet the lung transplantation criteria were retrospectively analyzed from January 2012 to December 2017 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University. A total of 111 patients, 88 males and 23 females, aged (58.3±11.4) years old, were divided into lung transplantation group and non-lung transplantation group. Clinical data and prognosis of the two groups were compared and the factors affecting the prognosis of lung transplantation were analyzed with relevant literatures. Results There were 56 patients in lung transplantation group and 55 patients in non-lung transplantation group. The mainly underlying disease of both groups were idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). There was no significant difference in age, body mass index, arterial partial pressure of oxygen, percentage of forced vital capacity in the estimated value, percentage of diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide in the estimated value, six-minute walk distance between the two groups (P>0.05). The pulmonary arterial hypertension and arterial partial pressure of carbondioxide were higher in lung transplantation group than non-transplantation group (P<0.05). The 1-year survival rate in the lung transplantation group was significantly higher than that in the non-lung transplantation group: 77.4% vs. 32.7% (P<0.01). COX regression analysis showed that preoperative ventilator dependence, serum creatinine, bilirubin, pulmonary artery pressure, and procedures (single lung vs. double lung) had no significant effect on the prognosis of lung transplantation; age and preoperative diabetes mellitus were risk factors for the prognosis of lung transplantation.ConclusionsLung transplantation can significantly improve the prognosis of patients with ILD who are refractory to medicine therapy. IPF patients should be advised to consider lung transplantation as soon as possible. Age and preoperative diabetes mellitus are risk factors for the prognosis of lung transplantation.
Resection is crucial for treating non-small cell lung cancer. Routine follow-up after surgery is an effective method for early detection and treatment of tumor recurrence and metastasis or the second primary tumor, which can improve the quality of life of patients and their prognosis. This consensus aims to provide a reference for colleagues responsible for postoperative follow-up of non-small cell lung cancer patients in China, and further improve the standardization of lung cancer diagnosis and treatment.
ObjectiveTo investigate the short-term therapeutic effect of neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy in the locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. MethodsThe clinical data of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant treatment in Gaozhou People's Hospital from August 2019 to October 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the different treatments, the patients were divided into two groups: a neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy group (NIC group) and a neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy group (NC group). The baseline data, incidence of adverse events during treatment, perioperative indicators, postoperative pathological remission rate and incidence of postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. ResultsTotally 33 patients were enrolled, including 15 males and 18 females, with an average age of 62.37±7.99 years. There were 17 patients in the NIC group and 16 patients in the NC group. In the NIC group, the carcinoma was mainly located in the middle and lower esophagus, with 5 paitents in stage Ⅱ, 9 patients in stage Ⅲ, and 3 patients in stage Ⅳa. In the NC group, the carcinoma was mainly located in the upper-middle esophagus, with 1 patient in stage Ⅱ and 15 patients in stage Ⅲ. During the neoadjuvant treatment, there was no significant difference in the occurrence of bone marrow suppression or gastrointestinal reactions between the two groups (P>0.05). There were 4 immune-related rashes in the NIC group and 1 esophageal perforation in the NC group. Fourteen (82.35%) patients in the NIC group and 12 (75.00%) patients in the NC group completed the operation on schedule. The postoperative ICU stay time and chest tube indwelling time in the NIC group were shorter than those in the NC group (P<0.05). There were 5 patients of complete remission in the NIC group, and 6 patients in the NC group. There was no significant difference in the pathological regression grade or residual tumor cells between the two groups (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of anastomotic fistula, thoracic gastric fistula, bronchial mediastinal fistula, abdominal distension, pulmonary infection, stroke, or hoarseness during the perioperative period between the two groups of patients who completed the operation (P>0.05). In the NC group, 2 patients died during the perioperative period because of thoracic gastric fistula complicated by severe infection. ConclusionNeoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy dose not significantly increase the occurrence of adverse events and shows a good rate of pathological remission, which indicates that the neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy is a safe, feasible and potential new treatment model.
ObjectiveTo compare the 5-year survival rates between two different follow-up patterns of postoperative stage Ⅰ-ⅢA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.MethodsPathological stage Ⅰ-ⅢA NSCLC 11 958 patients who underwent surgical resection and received follow-up within 6 months after initial diagnosis through telephone follow-up system were included in nine hospitals from July 2014 to July 2020. The patients were divided into two groups including a proactive follow-up group (n=3 825) and a passive follow-up group (n=8133) according to the way of following-up. There were 6 939 males and 5 019 females aged 59.8±9.5 years. The Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression model were used.ResultsThe median follow-up frequency was 8.0 times in the proactive follow-up group and 7.0 times in the passive follow-up group. The median call duration was 3.77 minutes in the proactive follow-up group and 3.58 minutes in the passive follow-up group. The 5-year survival rate was 81.8% and 74.2% (HR=0.60, 95CI 0.53-0.67, P<0.001) in the proactive follow-up group and the passive follow-up group, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that follow-up pattern, age, gender and operation mode were independent prognostic factors, and the results were consistent in all subgroups stratified by clinical stages.ConclusionThe proactive follow-up leads to better overall survival for resected stage Ⅰ-ⅢA NSCLC patients, especially in the stage ⅢA.